linux-trace-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Ze Gao <zegao2021@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>, Ze Gao <zegao@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] fprobe: make fprobe_kprobe_handler recursion free
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 01:03:11 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230517010311.f46db3f78b11cf9d92193527@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD8CoPDFp2_+D6nykj6mu_Pr57iN+8jO-kgA_FRrcxD8C7YU+Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 16 May 2023 17:47:52 +0800
Ze Gao <zegao2021@gmail.com> wrote:

> Precisely, these that are called within kprobe_busy_{begin, end},
> which the previous patch does not resolve.

Note that kprobe_busy_{begin,end} don't need to use notrace version
because kprobe itself prohibits probing on preempt_count_{add,sub}.

Thank you,

> I will refine the commit message to make it clear.
> 
> FYI, details can checked out here:
>     Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20230516132516.c902edcf21028874a74fb868@kernel.org/
> 
> Regards,
> Ze
> 
> On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 5:18 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 03:18:28PM +0800, Ze Gao wrote:
> > > Current implementation calls kprobe related functions before doing
> > > ftrace recursion check in fprobe_kprobe_handler, which opens door
> > > to kernel crash due to stack recursion if preempt_count_{add, sub}
> > > is traceable.
> >
> > Which preempt_count*() are you referring to? The ones you just made
> > _notrace in the previous patch?


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-16 16:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-16  7:18 [PATCH v2 0/4] Make fprobe + rethook immune to recursion Ze Gao
2023-05-16  7:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] rethook: use preempt_{disable, enable}_notrace in rethook_trampoline_handler Ze Gao
2023-05-16  7:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] fprobe: make fprobe_kprobe_handler recursion free Ze Gao
2023-05-16  9:15   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-16  9:35     ` Ze Gao
2023-05-16  9:18   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-16  9:47     ` Ze Gao
2023-05-16  9:51       ` Ze Gao
2023-05-16 16:03       ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2023-05-17  1:54         ` Ze Gao
2023-05-17  2:54           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-05-17  3:10             ` Ze Gao
2023-05-17  3:25               ` Steven Rostedt
2023-05-17  3:51                 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-05-17  4:51                 ` Ze Gao
2023-05-16  7:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] fprobe: add recursion detection in fprobe_exit_handler Ze Gao
2023-05-16  7:18 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] rehook, fprobe: do not trace rethook related functions Ze Gao
2023-05-16 14:20   ` Steven Rostedt
2023-05-17  2:00     ` Ze Gao
2023-05-16 16:05   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-05-16 21:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Make fprobe + rethook immune to recursion Jiri Olsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230517010311.f46db3f78b11cf9d92193527@kernel.org \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    --cc=zegao2021@gmail.com \
    --cc=zegao@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).