From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: sunliming <sunliming@kylinos.cn>
Cc: mhiramat@kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Beau Belgrave <beaub@linux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] racing/user_events: Prevent same address and bit per process
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 10:32:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230522103224.032ec78f@rorschach.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230519081035.228891-1-sunliming@kylinos.cn>
Is the subject a Freudian slip?
Added Beau. I need to add him to the maintainers file for user events ;-)
On Fri, 19 May 2023 16:10:35 +0800
sunliming <sunliming@kylinos.cn> wrote:
> User processes register name_args for events. If the same name are registered
> multiple times in the same process, it can cause undefined behavior. Because
> the same name may be used for a diffrent event. If this event has the same
> format as the original event, it is impossible to distinguish the trace output
> of these two events. If the event has a different format from the original event,
> the trace output of the new event is incorrect.
>
> Return EADDRINUSE back to the user process if the same event has being registered
> in the same process.
I'll let Beau ack this or not.
-- Steve
>
> Signed-off-by: sunliming <sunliming@kylinos.cn>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c
> index b1ecd7677642..4ef6bdb5c07c 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c
> @@ -1996,7 +1996,7 @@ static int user_events_ref_add(struct user_event_file_info *info,
>
> for (i = 0; i < count; ++i)
> if (refs->events[i] == user)
> - return i;
> + return -EADDRINUSE;
> }
>
> size = struct_size(refs, events, count + 1);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-22 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-19 8:10 [PATCH] racing/user_events: Prevent same address and bit per process sunliming
2023-05-22 14:32 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230522103224.032ec78f@rorschach.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=beaub@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=sunliming@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox