From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 02/11] tracing/probes: Add fprobe events for tracing function entry and exit.
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 16:52:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230608165234.0c00c146@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <168432114441.1351929.4695419422051966931.stgit@mhiramat.roam.corp.google.com>
On Wed, 17 May 2023 19:59:04 +0900
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
> Add fprobe events for tracing function entry and exit instead of kprobe
> events. With this change, we can continue to trace function entry/exit
> even if the CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE is not available. Since
> CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE requires the CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS,
> it is not available if the architecture only supports
> CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS. And that means kprobe events can not
> probe function entry/exit effectively on such architecture.
> But this can be solved if the dynamic events supports fprobe events.
>
> The fprobe event is a new dynamic events which is only for the function
> (symbol) entry and exit. This event accepts non register fetch arguments
> so that user can trace the function arguments and return values.
>
> The fprobe events syntax is here;
>
> f[:[GRP/][EVENT]] FUNCTION [FETCHARGS]
> f[MAXACTIVE][:[GRP/][EVENT]] FUNCTION%return [FETCHARGS]
I finally got around to look at these (I know you already queued them), but
looking at the above, the "%return" is redundant.
>
> E.g.
>
> # echo 'f vfs_read $arg1' >> dynamic_events
> # echo 'f vfs_read%return $retval' >> dynamic_events
> # cat dynamic_events
> f:fprobes/vfs_read__entry vfs_read arg1=$arg1
> f:fprobes/vfs_read__exit vfs_read%return arg1=$retval
Can't we just have:
f:fprobes/vfs_read__entry vfs_read arg1=$arg1
f:fprobes/vfs_read__exit vfs_read arg1=$retval
Where if "$retval" is specified, it automatically becomes a return? If
anything else is specified, it errors out. That is, if $retval is
specified, it becomes a return probe, as a return probe can only have
$retval. If anything else is specified, it errors out if $retval is also
specified.
Now if it's a void function, and you just want to make it a return then we
can have your:
f:fprobes/vfs_read__exit vfs_read%return
Thoughts?
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-08 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-17 10:58 [PATCH v11 00/11] tracing: Add fprobe/tracepoint events Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-05-17 10:58 ` [PATCH v11 01/11] fprobe: Pass return address to the handlers Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-05-17 10:59 ` [PATCH v11 02/11] tracing/probes: Add fprobe events for tracing function entry and exit Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-06-08 20:52 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2023-07-07 14:17 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-05-17 10:59 ` [PATCH v11 03/11] selftests/ftrace: Add fprobe related testcases Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-05-17 10:59 ` [PATCH v11 04/11] tracing/probes: Add tracepoint support on fprobe_events Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-05-17 10:59 ` [PATCH v11 05/11] tracing/probes: Move event parameter fetching code to common parser Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-05-17 10:59 ` [PATCH v11 06/11] tracing/probes: Support function parameters if BTF is available Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-05-17 10:59 ` [PATCH v11 07/11] tracing/probes: Add $arg* meta argument for all function args Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-05-17 11:00 ` [PATCH v11 08/11] tracing/probes: Add BTF retval type support Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-05-17 11:00 ` [PATCH v11 09/11] selftests/ftrace: Add tracepoint probe test case Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-05-17 14:37 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-05-17 11:00 ` [PATCH v11 10/11] selftests/ftrace: Add BTF arguments test cases Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-05-17 11:00 ` [PATCH v11 11/11] Documentation: tracing/probes: Add fprobe event tracing document Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-05-17 13:05 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-05-17 14:39 ` Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230608165234.0c00c146@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=revest@chromium.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).