From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51ECDEB64D8 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 03:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229593AbjFVDbq (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jun 2023 23:31:46 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52234 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229513AbjFVDbp (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jun 2023 23:31:45 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 206EE1A4; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 20:31:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AAE761735; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 03:31:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 13E1DC433C0; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 03:31:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1687404701; bh=WBmd0nq3sx1Y1vI60yLf61g1XYsV04DTZ0OhzpLUGBA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=qKpiAZdZxPraq1RHCCL2jgP4YMW8kD2nFTP6eBOg6qczrJnu9ZGo/6DDbPxBeDNVY TaEwXKKO2PSwiHanFWf48B0ZTZvbh58cGgfPY37mVnHWMmGSMtmWy2YjFnLV/r5BfS PDY0A84VD1Cqhib3Ux1c+imtQkS40Z8CGN4+HvzG9q6iz3G9VNq5uWjXw234FqTLZT BdkMdjZUBX7/Q2lhWxiyfDaY2oogiVdU1zdJ/jARqLAaQJ+3/fYNILN798xC6rWmbM M2u49QkBp9ekoyCGigaqRW7jCPn1uoDzvESuzSeLg3cGNFH7IermGnIOQxG6kZooGP bWOwX+R1fud7Q== Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 12:31:37 +0900 From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) To: Ajay Kaher Cc: Steven Rostedt , "mhiramat@kernel.org" , "shuah@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org" , Ching-lin Yu , Nadav Amit , "srivatsa@csail.mit.edu" , Alexey Makhalov , Vasavi Sirnapalli , Tapas Kundu , "er.ajay.kaher@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] tracing: introducing eventfs Message-Id: <20230622123137.4b74a306c9032de70cd99c51@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <1C7D95B2-3DF0-43AB-8F8B-7D3F7AE7FC0D@vmware.com> References: <1685610013-33478-1-git-send-email-akaher@vmware.com> <34E6364B-2B3D-4597-8143-1EEA645B6CDD@vmware.com> <20230620110227.6a944a19@gandalf.local.home> <1C7D95B2-3DF0-43AB-8F8B-7D3F7AE7FC0D@vmware.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.8.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 11:42:24 +0000 Ajay Kaher wrote: > > > > On 20-Jun-2023, at 8:32 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > !! External Email > > > > On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 05:38:25 +0000 > > Ajay Kaher wrote: > > > >> # of passed: 65 > >> # of failed: 3 > > > > Unrelated to your patches, but have you checked why these fail? Do you have > > the latest tests running on the latest kernel? > > > > Failed test got passed after enabling /proc/kallsyms, using: > echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/kptr_restrict Oh, interesting. It should be 'unresolved' (skipped) if that happens. [23] event filter function - test event filtering on functions [FAIL] [60] Kprobe events - probe points [FAIL] [106] (instance) event filter function - test event filtering on functions [FAIL] OK, let me see. Thanks for reporting! > Following is the report of ftracetest on Linux v6.4.0-rc7 (with/without eventfs): > # of passed: 68 > # of failed: 0 > # of unresolved: 6 > # of untested: 0 > # of unsupported: 45 > # of xfailed: 0 > # of undefined(test bug): 0 > > If lockdep is enabled getting same warning as reported by 'kernel test robot' for v3 09/10: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/1686640004-47546-1-git-send-email-akaher@vmware.com/ > > >> # of unresolved: 6 > >> # of untested: 0 > >> # of unsupported: 44 > >> # of xfailed: 0 > >> # of undefined(test bug): 0 > >> > >> These results are same with/without eventfs. > > > > I'm hoping to look at these patches this week. > > Yes, please. Thanks. > > -Ajay > -- Masami Hiramatsu (Google)