[RESEND][PATCH v2 2/3] cpufreq: schedutil: Refactor sugov_update_shared() internals

Lukasz Luba
2023-05-22T14:57:27Z

Remove the if section block. Use the simple check to bail out
and jump to the unlock at the end. That makes the code more readable
and ready for some future tracing.

Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
---
kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index e3211455b203..f462496e5c07 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -446,17 +446,19 @@ sugov_update_shared(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time, unsigned int flags)

ignore_dl_rate_limit(sg_cpu);

- if (sugov_should_update_freq(sg_policy, time)) {
- next_f = sugov_next_freq_shared(sg_cpu, time);
+ if (!sugov_should_update_freq(sg_policy, time))
+ goto unlock;

- if (!sugov_update_next_freq(sg_policy, time, next_f))
- goto unlock;
+ next_f = sugov_next_freq_shared(sg_cpu, time);
+
+ if (!sugov_update_next_freq(sg_policy, time, next_f))
+ goto unlock;
+
+ if (sg_policy->policy->fast_switch_enabled)
+ cpufreq_driver_fast_switch(sg_policy->policy, next_f);
+ else
+ sugov_deferred_update(sg_policy);

- if (sg_policy->policy->fast_switch_enabled)
- cpufreq_driver_fast_switch(sg_policy->policy, next_f);
- else
- sugov_deferred_update(sg_policy);
- }
unlock:
raw_spin_unlock(&sg_policy->update_lock);
}
--
2.25.1