From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA47EB64D9 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 09:53:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229957AbjGFJxp (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jul 2023 05:53:45 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49364 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229509AbjGFJxo (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jul 2023 05:53:44 -0400 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com (esa.microchip.iphmx.com [68.232.153.233]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB0A21727; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 02:53:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1688637222; x=1720173222; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=ZCTwEarZVfz6L7OhWE+2PAwDTd9f66HzYjjis2h0zro=; b=PDPcd0/3q66VUwgiJpg8IwwrmnFQLHhT66LQ8mmxoGQIz2F57G1MfRjZ T6l0B6hc/xDxLPLikoeYNH2KXhCCzeixxPqVxqYTwNmvcPCpyZpAAQ7Wq T+qNDcMTnhzhgICUswGDbA/4Cd2MBT5MZZfTRJw3/jKOMUt1R+dq/CWqL wvdCs5a99+EaQoWeS6LQcm9k9FIO+HC9EBmonP7zYb32qg8ZEjXdYBabw PklGGB9Ou75+9CaJJayp2lLJeOhJjsiTh3Rg0jbfvwNJ2NmYkavvDopi7 PSVJUW32ziD7HSYM9AZmSkkCdCitY9P0xY7CyYMoKlHyaTnmJLmI62aVW A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,185,1684825200"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="221603502" X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN Received: from unknown (HELO email.microchip.com) ([170.129.1.10]) by esa3.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 06 Jul 2023 02:53:40 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.87.72) by chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.87.72) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.21; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 02:53:37 -0700 Received: from wendy (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.21 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 02:53:35 -0700 Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 10:53:05 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: Song Shuai CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH V11 0/5] riscv: Optimize function trace Message-ID: <20230706-crumpet-chemist-84b1dce8b155@wendy> References: <20230627111612.761164-1-suagrfillet@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TsUbL/pzvtHwGmhl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org --TsUbL/pzvtHwGmhl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 05:35:49PM +0800, Song Shuai wrote: > Ping... A context-less ping is not very helpful - what are you looking for here? More reviews? For example, someone to look at 5/5? > =E5=9C=A8 2023/6/27 19:16, Song Shuai =E5=86=99=E9=81=93: If it's application you want, you sent the patch only last week - which was during the merge window, making it unlikely to be applied. Either way, please try to explain what it is that you are looking for when you do a ping! Cheers, Conor. --TsUbL/pzvtHwGmhl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZKaPAQAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0u7zAP4m9nHeOnzNDjd07uvtTYVoMTRG9PlPI7TMsYAWdsPwBgD+Ijw30cnV0FLL OmYhxUULMKySX5DeeB8VLFHiJXnLcg8= =9Z22 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TsUbL/pzvtHwGmhl--