linux-trace-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	samitolvanen@google.com, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/retpoline,kprobes: Avoid treating rethunk as an indirect jump
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 00:25:07 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230710002507.dae543b98d1cc1f950a165bd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9dabd1fc-7445-a305-6632-04f64e012648@suse.com>

On Sat, 8 Jul 2023 16:18:29 +0200
Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com> wrote:

> On 7/6/23 13:34, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 06:00:14PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> >> On Thu, 6 Jul 2023 09:17:05 +0200
> >> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 09:47:23AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>>> If I understand correctly, all indirect jump will be replaced with JMP_NOSPEC.
> >>>>>> If you read the insn_jump_into_range, I onlu jecks the jump code, not call.
> >>>>>> So the functions only have indirect call still allow optprobe.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> With the introduction of kCFI JMP_NOSPEC is no longer an equivalent to a
> >>>>> C indirect jump.
> >>>>
> >>>> If I understand correctly, kCFI is enabled by CFI_CLANG, and clang is not
> >>>> using jump-tables by default, so we can focus on gcc. In that case
> >>>> current check still work, correct?
> >>>
> >>> IIRC clang can use jump tables, but like GCC needs RETPOLINE=n and
> >>> IBT=n, so effectively nobody has them.
> >>
> >> So if it requires RETPOLINE=n, current __indirect_thunk_start/end checking
> >> is not required, right? (that code is embraced with "#ifdef CONFIG_RETPOLINE")
> > 
> > Correct.
> 
> Thank you both for the explanation.
> 
> If I understand correctly, it means this second patch can be dropped and
> I can instead replace it with a removal of the mentioned check. That
> will also void the main motivation for the first patch but that one
> should be still at least useful to make the LTO_CLANG=y build lay out
> the code in the same way as with other configurations.

Yes, something like removing __indirect_thunk_start/end check and 
disabling insn_is_indirect_jump() when defined(CONFIG_RETPOLINE) ||
 defined(CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT).

kCFI case is also handled later but another series.

Thank you,

> 
> I will post an updated series with these changes.
> 
> -- Petr
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-09 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-05  8:15 [PATCH 0/2] x86/retpoline,kprobes: Fix the [__indirect_thunk_start, ..end] range Petr Pavlu
2023-07-05  8:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/retpoline,kprobes: Fix position of thunk sections with CONFIG_LTO_CLANG Petr Pavlu
2023-07-05  8:52   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-05  8:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/retpoline,kprobes: Avoid treating rethunk as an indirect jump Petr Pavlu
2023-07-05  8:58   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-05 14:20     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-07-05 14:50       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-06  0:47         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-07-06  7:17           ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-06  9:00             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-07-06 11:34               ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-07 14:39                 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-07-08 14:18                 ` Petr Pavlu
2023-07-09 15:25                   ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2023-07-05  9:02   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-05 14:40   ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230710002507.dae543b98d1cc1f950a165bd@kernel.org \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=petr.pavlu@suse.com \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).