linux-trace-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/9] bpf/btf: Add a function to search a member of a struct/union
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 23:07:38 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230802230738.2b22cef561feb5d498f22f49@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQLkVatr5BTScpuKaKAO+Cp=0KVxhqXwsjZoGhJPu3G4jA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 1 Aug 2023 19:22:01 -0700
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 5:44 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 1 Aug 2023 20:40:54 -0400
> > Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe we can add a ftrace_partial_regs(fregs) that returns a
> > > partially filled pt_regs, and the caller that uses this obviously knows
> > > its partial (as it's in the name). But this doesn't quite help out arm64
> > > because unlike x86, struct ftrace_regs does not contain an address
> > > compatibility with pt_regs fields. It would need to do a copy.
> > >
> > >  ftrace_partial_regs(fregs, &regs) ?
> >
> > Well, both would be pointers so you wouldn't need the "&", but it was
> > to stress that it would be copying one to the other.
> >
> >   void ftrace_partial_regs(const struct ftrace_regs *fregs, struct pt_regs regs);
> 
> Copy works, but why did you pick a different layout?

I think it is for minimize the stack consumption. pt_regs on arm64 will
consume 42*u64 = 336 bytes, on the other hand ftrace_regs will use
14*unsigned long = 112 bytes. And most of the registers in pt_regs are not
accessed usually. (as you may know RISC processors usually have many
registers - and x86 will be if we use APX in kernel. So pt_regs is big.)

> Why not to use pt_regs ? if save of flags is slow, just skip that part
> and whatever else that is slow. You don't even need to zero out
> unsaved fields. Just ask the caller to zero out pt_regs before hand.
> Most users have per-cpu pt_regs that is being reused.
> So there will be one zero-out in the beginning and every partial
> save of regs will be fast.
> Then there won't be any need for copy-converter from ftrace_regs to pt_regs.
> Maybe too much churn at this point. copy is fine.

If there is no nested call, yeah, per-cpu pt_regs will work.

Thank you,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-02 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-31  7:30 [PATCH v4 0/9] tracing: Improbe BTF support on probe events Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-07-31  7:30 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] tracing/probes: Support BTF argument on module functions Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-07-31  7:30 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] bpf/btf: tracing: Move finding func-proto API and getting func-param API to BTF Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-07-31  7:30 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] bpf/btf: Add a function to search a member of a struct/union Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-07-31 21:59   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-07-31 23:57     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-08-01  0:29       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-08-01 15:02         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-08-01 15:20           ` Steven Rostedt
2023-08-01 15:32             ` Steven Rostedt
2023-08-01 22:18               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-08-01 23:09                 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-08-01 23:44                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-08-02  0:21                   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-08-02  0:40                     ` Steven Rostedt
2023-08-02  0:44                       ` Steven Rostedt
2023-08-02  2:22                         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-08-02  2:32                           ` Steven Rostedt
2023-08-02 14:07                           ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2023-08-02 15:08                             ` Florent Revest
2023-08-02 13:56                       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-08-02 14:48                         ` Florent Revest
2023-08-02 15:47                         ` Florent Revest
2023-08-03  1:55                           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-08-02 18:24                         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-08-02 18:38                           ` Steven Rostedt
2023-08-02 19:48                             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-08-02 20:12                               ` Steven Rostedt
2023-08-02 21:28                                 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-08-02 14:44                   ` Florent Revest
2023-08-02 16:11                     ` Steven Rostedt
2023-08-03 15:42                     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-08-03 16:37                       ` Florent Revest
2023-08-07 20:48                       ` Jiri Olsa
2023-08-08 14:32                         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-08-01  1:15     ` Steven Rostedt
2023-08-01  2:24       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-08-01 13:35         ` Steven Rostedt
2023-08-01 15:18         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-08-01 22:21           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-08-01 23:17             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-07-31  7:30 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] tracing/probes: Support BTF based data structure field access Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-07-31  7:30 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] tracing/probes: Support BTF field access from $retval Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-07-31  7:31 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] tracing/probes: Add string type check with BTF Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-07-31  7:31 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] tracing/fprobe-event: Assume fprobe is a return event by $retval Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-07-31  7:31 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] selftests/ftrace: Add BTF fields access testcases Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-07-31  7:31 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] Documentation: tracing: Update fprobe event example with BTF field Masami Hiramatsu (Google)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230802230738.2b22cef561feb5d498f22f49@kernel.org \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=revest@chromium.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).