From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320FDC25B5E for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 20:09:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S244033AbjHPUJX (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Aug 2023 16:09:23 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48720 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234641AbjHPUIt (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Aug 2023 16:08:49 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67B25CD; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 13:08:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06A6766BD8; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 20:08:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D20E0C433C8; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 20:08:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 16:08:50 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" Cc: Chuang Wang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tracing/eprobe: Iterate trace_eprobe directly Message-ID: <20230816160850.48fa95b6@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20230812142019.06cb38b56287b0f068e8164f@kernel.org> References: <20230811081239.246365-1-nashuiliang@gmail.com> <20230811154523.61e67cc3@gandalf.local.home> <20230812142019.06cb38b56287b0f068e8164f@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 12 Aug 2023 14:20:19 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote: > > At a minimum, let's call it: > > > > for_each_trace_point_eprobe() > > OK, what about "for_each_trace_eprobe_on()"? I would like to clarify > > - what type is returned > - not all trace_eprobes, but only on the trace_probe. > > Thank you, for_each_trace_eprobe_tp() or for_each_trace_tp_eprobe() ? As it only works for a trace_probe. -- Steve