From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6625C678DC for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 11:04:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S244743AbjHRLDf (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Aug 2023 07:03:35 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44852 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243727AbjHRLDE (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Aug 2023 07:03:04 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 073DF2722; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 04:03:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9770C65ECE; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 11:03:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 96FAEC433C7; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 11:03:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1692356583; bh=klz9FaS+VfT+r6P08TExqYfZdZ0wrHKtfW1SQSee8Zg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=X8yohGEj0M58n8ht4tan10WU/GZKIcNyFWXtdyb66JsN/mPzKP22TIbOGB9qC/IKi +hWcR4OQ6HMIAmPOVFiFtx09LjX9gA114p406POq2Oy06WUNi4VbgqnIcqkj596U+p 6hvy2WSHIvO2HnejFk6P55JI4ir6tUwHwk/5OjxBD0bAQ+ov0wtKl92cTXfk0VR0oq oGPJYGdYOYz15E0tUr88L5hWMeE/ooMXjeCb5sYrmwkK51EuM7h5KQCHqOf51FUyqY sZFMWk2c/SCkl8BKWwctwZmMb5heabLkbAPAByPAlkk6SqennR/enQ8Aj1VNUuYhed 1oxfUgPch9RZA== Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 20:02:58 +0900 From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Chuang Wang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tracing/eprobe: Iterate trace_eprobe directly Message-Id: <20230818200258.7f318bab352508c54ed53e83@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20230816160850.48fa95b6@gandalf.local.home> References: <20230811081239.246365-1-nashuiliang@gmail.com> <20230811154523.61e67cc3@gandalf.local.home> <20230812142019.06cb38b56287b0f068e8164f@kernel.org> <20230816160850.48fa95b6@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 16:08:50 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Sat, 12 Aug 2023 14:20:19 +0900 > Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote: > > > > At a minimum, let's call it: > > > > > > for_each_trace_point_eprobe() > > > > OK, what about "for_each_trace_eprobe_on()"? I would like to clarify > > > > - what type is returned > > - not all trace_eprobes, but only on the trace_probe. > > > > Thank you, > > for_each_trace_eprobe_tp() or for_each_trace_tp_eprobe() ? for_each_trace_eprobe_tp() is OK for me. Thanks! > > As it only works for a trace_probe. > > -- Steve -- Masami Hiramatsu (Google)