* [PATCH v3] vmscan: add trace events for lru_gen [not found] <CGME20230924142129epcas1p4ae9161f7c20ea16408ccc8296f81104a@epcas1p4.samsung.com> @ 2023-09-24 14:23 ` Jaewon Kim 2023-09-25 21:36 ` SeongJae Park 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Jaewon Kim @ 2023-09-24 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: rostedt, tjmercier, yuzhao, kaleshsingh, akpm, vbabka, hannes Cc: linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, linux-mm, jaewon31.kim, Jaewon Kim As the legacy lru provides, the lru_gen needs some trace events for debugging. This commit introduces 2 trace events. trace_mm_vmscan_lru_gen_scan trace_mm_vmscan_lru_gen_evict Each event is similar to the following legacy events. trace_mm_vmscan_lru_isolate, trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_[in]active Here's an example mm_vmscan_lru_gen_scan: isolate_mode=0 classzone=1 order=9 nr_requested=4096 nr_scanned=431 nr_skipped=0 nr_taken=55 lru=anon mm_vmscan_lru_gen_evict: nid=0 nr_reclaimed=42 nr_dirty=0 nr_writeback=0 nr_congested=0 nr_immediate=0 nr_activate_anon=13 nr_activate_file=0 nr_ref_keep=0 nr_unmap_fail=0 priority=2 flags=RECLAIM_WB_ANON|RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC mm_vmscan_lru_gen_scan: isolate_mode=0 classzone=1 order=9 nr_requested=4096 nr_scanned=66 nr_skipped=0 nr_taken=64 lru=file mm_vmscan_lru_gen_evict: nid=0 nr_reclaimed=62 nr_dirty=0 nr_writeback=0 nr_congested=0 nr_immediate=0 nr_activate_anon=0 nr_activate_file=2 nr_ref_keep=0 nr_unmap_fail=0 priority=2 flags=RECLAIM_WB_FILE|RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Reviewed-by: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@google.com> --- v3: change printk format v2: use condition and make it aligned v1: introduce trace events --- include/trace/events/mmflags.h | 5 ++ include/trace/events/vmscan.h | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ mm/vmscan.c | 17 ++++-- 3 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/trace/events/mmflags.h b/include/trace/events/mmflags.h index 1478b9dd05fa..44e9b38f83e7 100644 --- a/include/trace/events/mmflags.h +++ b/include/trace/events/mmflags.h @@ -274,6 +274,10 @@ IF_HAVE_VM_SOFTDIRTY(VM_SOFTDIRTY, "softdirty" ) \ EM (LRU_ACTIVE_FILE, "active_file") \ EMe(LRU_UNEVICTABLE, "unevictable") +#define LRU_GEN_NAMES \ + EM (LRU_GEN_ANON, "anon") \ + EMe(LRU_GEN_FILE, "file") + /* * First define the enums in the above macros to be exported to userspace * via TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(). @@ -288,6 +292,7 @@ COMPACTION_PRIORITY /* COMPACTION_FEEDBACK are defines not enums. Not needed here. */ ZONE_TYPE LRU_NAMES +LRU_GEN_NAMES /* * Now redefine the EM() and EMe() macros to map the enums to the strings diff --git a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h index d2123dd960d5..12eee5558016 100644 --- a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h +++ b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h @@ -327,6 +327,57 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate, __print_symbolic(__entry->lru, LRU_NAMES)) ); +TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION(mm_vmscan_lru_gen_scan, + TP_PROTO(int highest_zoneidx, + int order, + unsigned long nr_requested, + unsigned long nr_scanned, + unsigned long nr_skipped, + unsigned long nr_taken, + isolate_mode_t isolate_mode, + int lru), + + TP_ARGS(highest_zoneidx, order, nr_requested, nr_scanned, nr_skipped, nr_taken, isolate_mode, lru), + + TP_CONDITION(nr_scanned), + + TP_STRUCT__entry( + __field(int, highest_zoneidx) + __field(int, order) + __field(unsigned long, nr_requested) + __field(unsigned long, nr_scanned) + __field(unsigned long, nr_skipped) + __field(unsigned long, nr_taken) + __field(unsigned int, isolate_mode) + __field(int, lru) + ), + + TP_fast_assign( + __entry->highest_zoneidx = highest_zoneidx; + __entry->order = order; + __entry->nr_requested = nr_requested; + __entry->nr_scanned = nr_scanned; + __entry->nr_skipped = nr_skipped; + __entry->nr_taken = nr_taken; + __entry->isolate_mode = (__force unsigned int)isolate_mode; + __entry->lru = lru; + ), + + /* + * classzone is previous name of the highest_zoneidx. + * Reason not to change it is the ABI requirement of the tracepoint. + */ + TP_printk("isolate_mode=%u classzone=%d order=%d nr_requested=%lu nr_scanned=%lu nr_skipped=%lu nr_taken=%lu lru=%s", + __entry->isolate_mode, + __entry->highest_zoneidx, + __entry->order, + __entry->nr_requested, + __entry->nr_scanned, + __entry->nr_skipped, + __entry->nr_taken, + __print_symbolic(__entry->lru, LRU_GEN_NAMES)) +); + TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_write_folio, TP_PROTO(struct folio *folio), @@ -437,6 +488,53 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active, show_reclaim_flags(__entry->reclaim_flags)) ); +TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_gen_evict, + + TP_PROTO(int nid, unsigned long nr_reclaimed, + struct reclaim_stat *stat, int priority, int file), + + TP_ARGS(nid, nr_reclaimed, stat, priority, file), + + TP_STRUCT__entry( + __field(unsigned long, nr_reclaimed) + __field(unsigned long, nr_dirty) + __field(unsigned long, nr_writeback) + __field(unsigned long, nr_congested) + __field(unsigned long, nr_immediate) + __field(unsigned int, nr_activate0) + __field(unsigned int, nr_activate1) + __field(unsigned long, nr_ref_keep) + __field(unsigned long, nr_unmap_fail) + __field(int, nid) + __field(int, priority) + __field(int, reclaim_flags) + ), + + TP_fast_assign( + __entry->nid = nid; + __entry->nr_reclaimed = nr_reclaimed; + __entry->nr_dirty = stat->nr_dirty; + __entry->nr_writeback = stat->nr_writeback; + __entry->nr_congested = stat->nr_congested; + __entry->nr_immediate = stat->nr_immediate; + __entry->nr_activate0 = stat->nr_activate[0]; + __entry->nr_activate1 = stat->nr_activate[1]; + __entry->nr_ref_keep = stat->nr_ref_keep; + __entry->nr_unmap_fail = stat->nr_unmap_fail; + __entry->priority = priority; + __entry->reclaim_flags = trace_reclaim_flags(file); + ), + + TP_printk("nid=%d nr_reclaimed=%lu nr_dirty=%lu nr_writeback=%lu nr_congested=%lu nr_immediate=%lu nr_activate_anon=%u nr_activate_file=%u nr_ref_keep=%lu nr_unmap_fail=%lu priority=%d flags=%s", + __entry->nid, __entry->nr_reclaimed, + __entry->nr_dirty, __entry->nr_writeback, + __entry->nr_congested, __entry->nr_immediate, + __entry->nr_activate0, __entry->nr_activate1, + __entry->nr_ref_keep, __entry->nr_unmap_fail, + __entry->priority, + show_reclaim_flags(__entry->reclaim_flags)) +); + TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_node_reclaim_begin, TP_PROTO(int nid, int order, gfp_t gfp_flags), diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 6f13394b112e..f453a0f8ceef 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -5005,6 +5005,7 @@ static int scan_folios(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, int sorted = 0; int scanned = 0; int isolated = 0; + int skipped = 0; int remaining = MAX_LRU_BATCH; struct lru_gen_folio *lrugen = &lruvec->lrugen; struct mem_cgroup *memcg = lruvec_memcg(lruvec); @@ -5018,7 +5019,7 @@ static int scan_folios(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, for (i = MAX_NR_ZONES; i > 0; i--) { LIST_HEAD(moved); - int skipped = 0; + int skipped_zone = 0; int zone = (sc->reclaim_idx + i) % MAX_NR_ZONES; struct list_head *head = &lrugen->folios[gen][type][zone]; @@ -5040,16 +5041,17 @@ static int scan_folios(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, isolated += delta; } else { list_move(&folio->lru, &moved); - skipped += delta; + skipped_zone += delta; } - if (!--remaining || max(isolated, skipped) >= MIN_LRU_BATCH) + if (!--remaining || max(isolated, skipped_zone) >= MIN_LRU_BATCH) break; } - if (skipped) { + if (skipped_zone) { list_splice(&moved, head); - __count_zid_vm_events(PGSCAN_SKIP, zone, skipped); + __count_zid_vm_events(PGSCAN_SKIP, zone, skipped_zone); + skipped += skipped_zone; } if (!remaining || isolated >= MIN_LRU_BATCH) @@ -5065,6 +5067,9 @@ static int scan_folios(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, __count_memcg_events(memcg, PGREFILL, sorted); __count_vm_events(PGSCAN_ANON + type, isolated); + trace_mm_vmscan_lru_gen_scan(sc->reclaim_idx, sc->order, MAX_LRU_BATCH, + scanned, skipped, isolated, + sc->may_unmap ? 0 : ISOLATE_UNMAPPED, type); /* * There might not be eligible folios due to reclaim_idx. Check the * remaining to prevent livelock if it's not making progress. @@ -5194,6 +5199,8 @@ static int evict_folios(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, int swap retry: reclaimed = shrink_folio_list(&list, pgdat, sc, &stat, false); sc->nr_reclaimed += reclaimed; + trace_mm_vmscan_lru_gen_evict(pgdat->node_id, reclaimed, &stat, + sc->priority, type); list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(folio, next, &list, lru) { if (!folio_evictable(folio)) { -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] vmscan: add trace events for lru_gen 2023-09-24 14:23 ` [PATCH v3] vmscan: add trace events for lru_gen Jaewon Kim @ 2023-09-25 21:36 ` SeongJae Park 2023-09-26 2:11 ` 김재원 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: SeongJae Park @ 2023-09-25 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jaewon Kim Cc: rostedt, tjmercier, yuzhao, kaleshsingh, akpm, vbabka, hannes, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, linux-mm, jaewon31.kim Hello, On Sun, 24 Sep 2023 23:23:43 +0900 Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com> wrote: > As the legacy lru provides, the lru_gen needs some trace events for > debugging. > > This commit introduces 2 trace events. > trace_mm_vmscan_lru_gen_scan > trace_mm_vmscan_lru_gen_evict > > Each event is similar to the following legacy events. > trace_mm_vmscan_lru_isolate, > trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_[in]active > > Here's an example > mm_vmscan_lru_gen_scan: isolate_mode=0 classzone=1 order=9 nr_requested=4096 nr_scanned=431 nr_skipped=0 nr_taken=55 lru=anon > mm_vmscan_lru_gen_evict: nid=0 nr_reclaimed=42 nr_dirty=0 nr_writeback=0 nr_congested=0 nr_immediate=0 nr_activate_anon=13 nr_activate_file=0 nr_ref_keep=0 nr_unmap_fail=0 priority=2 flags=RECLAIM_WB_ANON|RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC > mm_vmscan_lru_gen_scan: isolate_mode=0 classzone=1 order=9 nr_requested=4096 nr_scanned=66 nr_skipped=0 nr_taken=64 lru=file > mm_vmscan_lru_gen_evict: nid=0 nr_reclaimed=62 nr_dirty=0 nr_writeback=0 nr_congested=0 nr_immediate=0 nr_activate_anon=0 nr_activate_file=2 nr_ref_keep=0 nr_unmap_fail=0 priority=2 flags=RECLAIM_WB_FILE|RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC > > Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com> > Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> > Reviewed-by: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@google.com> > --- > v3: change printk format > v2: use condition and make it aligned > v1: introduce trace events > --- > include/trace/events/mmflags.h | 5 ++ > include/trace/events/vmscan.h | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > mm/vmscan.c | 17 ++++-- > 3 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/trace/events/mmflags.h b/include/trace/events/mmflags.h > index 1478b9dd05fa..44e9b38f83e7 100644 > --- a/include/trace/events/mmflags.h > +++ b/include/trace/events/mmflags.h > @@ -274,6 +274,10 @@ IF_HAVE_VM_SOFTDIRTY(VM_SOFTDIRTY, "softdirty" ) \ > EM (LRU_ACTIVE_FILE, "active_file") \ > EMe(LRU_UNEVICTABLE, "unevictable") > > +#define LRU_GEN_NAMES \ > + EM (LRU_GEN_ANON, "anon") \ > + EMe(LRU_GEN_FILE, "file") > + I found this patchset makes build fails when !CONFIG_LRU_GEN, like below: In file included from /linux/include/trace/trace_events.h:27, from /linux/include/trace/define_trace.h:102, from /linux/include/trace/events/oom.h:195, from /linux/mm/oom_kill.c:53: /linux/include/trace/events/mmflags.h:278:7: error: ‘LRU_GEN_ANON’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘LRU_GEN_PGOFF’? 278 | EM (LRU_GEN_ANON, "anon") \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ Maybe some config checks are needed? Thanks, SJ [...] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v3] vmscan: add trace events for lru_gen 2023-09-25 21:36 ` SeongJae Park @ 2023-09-26 2:11 ` 김재원 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: 김재원 @ 2023-09-26 2:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: SeongJae Park Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, tjmercier@google.com, yuzhao@google.com, kaleshsingh@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, vbabka@suse.cz, hannes@cmpxchg.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, jaewon31.kim@gmail.com >Hello, > >On Sun, 24 Sep 2023 23:23:43 +0900 Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com> wrote: > >> As the legacy lru provides, the lru_gen needs some trace events for >> debugging. >> >> This commit introduces 2 trace events. >> trace_mm_vmscan_lru_gen_scan >> trace_mm_vmscan_lru_gen_evict >> >> Each event is similar to the following legacy events. >> trace_mm_vmscan_lru_isolate, >> trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_[in]active >> >> Here's an example >> mm_vmscan_lru_gen_scan: isolate_mode=0 classzone=1 order=9 nr_requested=4096 nr_scanned=431 nr_skipped=0 nr_taken=55 lru=anon >> mm_vmscan_lru_gen_evict: nid=0 nr_reclaimed=42 nr_dirty=0 nr_writeback=0 nr_congested=0 nr_immediate=0 nr_activate_anon=13 nr_activate_file=0 nr_ref_keep=0 nr_unmap_fail=0 priority=2 flags=RECLAIM_WB_ANON|RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC >> mm_vmscan_lru_gen_scan: isolate_mode=0 classzone=1 order=9 nr_requested=4096 nr_scanned=66 nr_skipped=0 nr_taken=64 lru=file >> mm_vmscan_lru_gen_evict: nid=0 nr_reclaimed=62 nr_dirty=0 nr_writeback=0 nr_congested=0 nr_immediate=0 nr_activate_anon=0 nr_activate_file=2 nr_ref_keep=0 nr_unmap_fail=0 priority=2 flags=RECLAIM_WB_FILE|RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC >> >> Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com> >> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> >> Reviewed-by: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@google.com> >> --- >> v3: change printk format >> v2: use condition and make it aligned >> v1: introduce trace events >> --- >> include/trace/events/mmflags.h | 5 ++ >> include/trace/events/vmscan.h | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> mm/vmscan.c | 17 ++++-- >> 3 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/trace/events/mmflags.h b/include/trace/events/mmflags.h >> index 1478b9dd05fa..44e9b38f83e7 100644 >> --- a/include/trace/events/mmflags.h >> +++ b/include/trace/events/mmflags.h >> @@ -274,6 +274,10 @@ IF_HAVE_VM_SOFTDIRTY(VM_SOFTDIRTY, "softdirty" ) \ >> EM (LRU_ACTIVE_FILE, "active_file") \ >> EMe(LRU_UNEVICTABLE, "unevictable") >> >> +#define LRU_GEN_NAMES \ >> + EM (LRU_GEN_ANON, "anon") \ >> + EMe(LRU_GEN_FILE, "file") >> + > >I found this patchset makes build fails when !CONFIG_LRU_GEN, like below: > > In file included from /linux/include/trace/trace_events.h:27, > from /linux/include/trace/define_trace.h:102, > from /linux/include/trace/events/oom.h:195, > from /linux/mm/oom_kill.c:53: > /linux/include/trace/events/mmflags.h:278:7: error: ‘LRU_GEN_ANON’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘LRU_GEN_PGOFF’? > 278 | EM (LRU_GEN_ANON, "anon") \ > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ > >Maybe some config checks are needed? Sorry and thank you for your comment. I think I need to wrap with CONFIG_LRU_GEN Adding #ifdef CONFIG_LRU_GEN even to vmscan.c seems not nice though. Additionally I had to remove isolate_mode to be compatible with mm, vmscan: remove ISOLATE_UNMAPPED https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20230914131637.12204-4-vbabka@suse.cz/ Here's what I changed on top of this v3 patch. I'm trying to find a way not to use ifdef CONFIG_LRU_GEN in vmscan.c --- a/include/trace/events/mmflags.h +++ b/include/trace/events/mmflags.h @@ -274,9 +274,11 @@ IF_HAVE_VM_SOFTDIRTY(VM_SOFTDIRTY, "softdirty" ) \ EM (LRU_ACTIVE_FILE, "active_file") \ EMe(LRU_UNEVICTABLE, "unevictable") +#ifdef CONFIG_LRU_GEN #define LRU_GEN_NAMES \ EM (LRU_GEN_ANON, "anon") \ EMe(LRU_GEN_FILE, "file") +#endif /* * First define the enums in the above macros to be exported to userspace @@ -292,7 +294,9 @@ COMPACTION_PRIORITY /* COMPACTION_FEEDBACK are defines not enums. Not needed here. */ ZONE_TYPE LRU_NAMES +#ifdef CONFIG_LRU_GEN LRU_GEN_NAMES +#endif /* * Now redefine the EM() and EMe() macros to map the enums to the strings diff --git a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h index e7230fa8bda1..ba99182d6558 100644 --- a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h +++ b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h @@ -323,6 +323,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate, __print_symbolic(__entry->lru, LRU_NAMES)) ); +#ifdef CONFIG_LRU_GEN TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION(mm_vmscan_lru_gen_scan, TP_PROTO(int highest_zoneidx, int order, @@ -330,10 +331,9 @@ TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION(mm_vmscan_lru_gen_scan, unsigned long nr_scanned, unsigned long nr_skipped, unsigned long nr_taken, - isolate_mode_t isolate_mode, int lru), - TP_ARGS(highest_zoneidx, order, nr_requested, nr_scanned, nr_skipped, nr_taken, isolate_mode, lru), + TP_ARGS(highest_zoneidx, order, nr_requested, nr_scanned, nr_skipped, nr_taken, lru), TP_CONDITION(nr_scanned), @@ -344,7 +344,6 @@ TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION(mm_vmscan_lru_gen_scan, __field(unsigned long, nr_scanned) __field(unsigned long, nr_skipped) __field(unsigned long, nr_taken) - __field(unsigned int, isolate_mode) __field(int, lru) ), @@ -355,7 +354,6 @@ TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION(mm_vmscan_lru_gen_scan, __entry->nr_scanned = nr_scanned; __entry->nr_skipped = nr_skipped; __entry->nr_taken = nr_taken; - __entry->isolate_mode = (__force unsigned int)isolate_mode; __entry->lru = lru; ), @@ -363,7 +361,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION(mm_vmscan_lru_gen_scan, * classzone is previous name of the highest_zoneidx. * Reason not to change it is the ABI requirement of the tracepoint. */ - TP_printk("isolate_mode=%u classzone=%d order=%d nr_requested=%lu nr_scanned=%lu nr_skipped=%lu nr_taken=%lu lru=%s", + TP_printk("classzone=%d order=%d nr_requested=%lu nr_scanned=%lu nr_skipped=%lu nr_taken=%lu lru=%s", __entry->isolate_mode, __entry->highest_zoneidx, __entry->order, @@ -373,6 +371,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION(mm_vmscan_lru_gen_scan, __entry->nr_taken, __print_symbolic(__entry->lru, LRU_GEN_NAMES)) ); +#endif TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_write_folio, @@ -484,6 +483,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active, show_reclaim_flags(__entry->reclaim_flags)) ); +#ifdef CONFIG_LRU_GEN TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_gen_evict, TP_PROTO(int nid, unsigned long nr_reclaimed, @@ -530,6 +530,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_gen_evict, __entry->priority, show_reclaim_flags(__entry->reclaim_flags)) ); +#endif TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_node_reclaim_begin, diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index dbfacf79b42c..d26e1d2610ca 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -4390,9 +4390,10 @@ static int scan_folios(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, __count_memcg_events(memcg, PGREFILL, sorted); __count_vm_events(PGSCAN_ANON + type, isolated); +#ifdef CONFIG_LRU_GEN trace_mm_vmscan_lru_gen_scan(sc->reclaim_idx, sc->order, MAX_LRU_BATCH, - scanned, skipped, isolated, - sc->may_unmap ? 0 : ISOLATE_UNMAPPED, type); + scanned, skipped, isolated, type); +#endif /* * There might not be eligible folios due to reclaim_idx. Check the * remaining to prevent livelock if it's not making progress. @@ -4522,8 +4523,10 @@ static int evict_folios(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, int swap retry: reclaimed = shrink_folio_list(&list, pgdat, sc, &stat, false); sc->nr_reclaimed += reclaimed; +#ifdef CONFIG_LRU_GEN trace_mm_vmscan_lru_gen_evict(pgdat->node_id, reclaimed, &stat, sc->priority, type); +#endif list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(folio, next, &list, lru) { if (!folio_evictable(folio)) { Thank you > > >Thanks, >SJ ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-09-26 2:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CGME20230924142129epcas1p4ae9161f7c20ea16408ccc8296f81104a@epcas1p4.samsung.com>
2023-09-24 14:23 ` [PATCH v3] vmscan: add trace events for lru_gen Jaewon Kim
2023-09-25 21:36 ` SeongJae Park
2023-09-26 2:11 ` 김재원
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox