linux-trace-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Trace Kernel <linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ajay Kaher <akaher@vmware.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eventfs: Process deletion of dentry more thoroughly
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2023 00:16:59 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231101001659.1456b3d4@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231101022553.GE1957730@ZenIV>

On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 02:25:53 +0000
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 02:47:03PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > 
> > Looking at how dentry is removed via the tracefs system, I found that
> > eventfs does not do everything that it did under tracefs. The tracefs
> > removal of a dentry calls simple_recursive_removal() that does a lot more
> > than a simple d_invalidate().  
> 
> Umm...  Is there any reason not to use simple_recursive_removal() there?

Hmm, I may be able to (I'm still a newbie with understanding of the vfs).

I did it this way thinking that a dentry may exist in the children but not
at a higher level, but I don't think that can be the case. This creates
dentries and inodes dynamically when they are referenced. The eventfs_inode
maps to each directory (the files of a directory are created from the
information from the eventfs_inode).

My thought process for doing it this way was if a child created a dentry
but the parent did not. But I don't think that can happen, right? So all I
may need to do is to check if the ei->dentry exists for the ei that is
being deleted, and after marking it and all its children as "freed", I can
then call simple_recursive_removal() on the top ei->dentry if it exists, as
that will guarantee to get all the dentries of any of the children that
exist. Right?

-- Steve

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-01  4:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-31 18:47 [PATCH] eventfs: Process deletion of dentry more thoroughly Steven Rostedt
2023-11-01  2:25 ` Al Viro
2023-11-01  4:16   ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2023-11-01 14:55     ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231101001659.1456b3d4@gandalf.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=akaher@vmware.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).