From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@kernel.org>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>,
Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>,
Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>,
David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>,
Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>,
Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>,
Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.com>,
Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@microsoft.com>,
Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, v9fs@lists.linux.dev,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
gfs2@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev,
linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 37/41] ocfs2: adapt to breakup of struct file_lock
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 05:43:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240125-flsplit-v2-37-7485322b62c7@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240125-flsplit-v2-0-7485322b62c7@kernel.org>
Most of the existing APIs have remained the same, but subsystems that
access file_lock fields directly need to reach into struct
file_lock_core now.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
---
fs/ocfs2/locks.c | 13 ++++++-------
fs/ocfs2/stack_user.c | 3 +--
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/locks.c b/fs/ocfs2/locks.c
index 8a9970dc852e..b86df9b59719 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/locks.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/locks.c
@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@
*/
#include <linux/fs.h>
-#define _NEED_FILE_LOCK_FIELD_MACROS
#include <linux/filelock.h>
#include <linux/fcntl.h>
@@ -28,7 +27,7 @@ static int ocfs2_do_flock(struct file *file, struct inode *inode,
struct ocfs2_file_private *fp = file->private_data;
struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres = &fp->fp_flock;
- if (fl->fl_type == F_WRLCK)
+ if (fl->fl_core.flc_type == F_WRLCK)
level = 1;
if (!IS_SETLKW(cmd))
trylock = 1;
@@ -54,8 +53,8 @@ static int ocfs2_do_flock(struct file *file, struct inode *inode,
*/
locks_init_lock(&request);
- request.fl_type = F_UNLCK;
- request.fl_flags = FL_FLOCK;
+ request.fl_core.flc_type = F_UNLCK;
+ request.fl_core.flc_flags = FL_FLOCK;
locks_lock_file_wait(file, &request);
ocfs2_file_unlock(file);
@@ -101,14 +100,14 @@ int ocfs2_flock(struct file *file, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl)
struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb);
- if (!(fl->fl_flags & FL_FLOCK))
+ if (!(fl->fl_core.flc_flags & FL_FLOCK))
return -ENOLCK;
if ((osb->s_mount_opt & OCFS2_MOUNT_LOCALFLOCKS) ||
ocfs2_mount_local(osb))
return locks_lock_file_wait(file, fl);
- if (fl->fl_type == F_UNLCK)
+ if (fl->fl_core.flc_type == F_UNLCK)
return ocfs2_do_funlock(file, cmd, fl);
else
return ocfs2_do_flock(file, inode, cmd, fl);
@@ -119,7 +118,7 @@ int ocfs2_lock(struct file *file, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl)
struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb);
- if (!(fl->fl_flags & FL_POSIX))
+ if (!(fl->fl_core.flc_flags & FL_POSIX))
return -ENOLCK;
return ocfs2_plock(osb->cconn, OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_blkno, file, cmd, fl);
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/stack_user.c b/fs/ocfs2/stack_user.c
index 460c882c5384..70fa466746d3 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/stack_user.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/stack_user.c
@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>
-#define _NEED_FILE_LOCK_FIELD_MACROS
#include <linux/filelock.h>
#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
@@ -745,7 +744,7 @@ static int user_plock(struct ocfs2_cluster_connection *conn,
return dlm_posix_cancel(conn->cc_lockspace, ino, file, fl);
else if (IS_GETLK(cmd))
return dlm_posix_get(conn->cc_lockspace, ino, file, fl);
- else if (fl->fl_type == F_UNLCK)
+ else if (fl->fl_core.flc_type == F_UNLCK)
return dlm_posix_unlock(conn->cc_lockspace, ino, file, fl);
else
return dlm_posix_lock(conn->cc_lockspace, ino, file, cmd, fl);
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-25 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-25 10:42 [PATCH v2 00/41] filelock: split struct file_lock into file_lock and file_lease structs Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 01/41] filelock: rename some fields in tracepoints Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 02/41] filelock: rename fl_pid variable in lock_get_status Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 03/41] dlm: rename fl_flags variable in dlm_posix_unlock Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 04/41] nfs: rename fl_flags variable in nfs4_proc_unlck Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 05/41] nfsd: rename fl_type and fl_flags variables in nfsd4_lock Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 06/41] lockd: rename fl_flags and fl_type variables in nlmclnt_lock Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 07/41] 9p: rename fl_type variable in v9fs_file_do_lock Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 08/41] afs: rename fl_type variable in afs_next_locker Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 09/41] filelock: drop the IS_* macros Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 10/41] filelock: split common fields into struct file_lock_core Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 11/41] filelock: add coccinelle scripts to move fields to " Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 12/41] filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 13/41] filelock: convert some internal functions to use file_lock_core instead Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 14/41] filelock: convert more internal functions to use file_lock_core Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 15/41] filelock: make posix_same_owner take file_lock_core pointers Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 16/41] filelock: convert posix_owner_key to take file_lock_core arg Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 17/41] filelock: make locks_{insert,delete}_global_locks " Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 18/41] filelock: convert locks_{insert,delete}_global_blocked Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 19/41] filelock: make __locks_delete_block and __locks_wake_up_blocks take file_lock_core Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 20/41] filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 21/41] filelock: convert fl_blocker to file_lock_core Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 22/41] filelock: clean up locks_delete_block internals Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 23/41] filelock: reorganize locks_delete_block and __locks_insert_block Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 24/41] filelock: make assign_type helper take a file_lock_core pointer Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 25/41] filelock: convert locks_wake_up_blocks to " Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 26/41] filelock: convert locks_insert_lock_ctx and locks_delete_lock_ctx Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 27/41] filelock: convert locks_translate_pid to take file_lock_core Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 28/41] filelock: convert seqfile handling to use file_lock_core Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 29/41] 9p: adapt to breakup of struct file_lock Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 30/41] afs: " Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 31/41] ceph: " Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 32/41] dlm: " Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 33/41] gfs2: " Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 34/41] lockd: " Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 35/41] nfs: " Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 36/41] nfsd: " Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 38/41] smb/client: " Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 39/41] smb/server: " Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 40/41] filelock: remove temporary compatability macros Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 41/41] filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 00/41] filelock: split struct file_lock into file_lock and file_lease structs Chuck Lever
2024-01-25 17:00 ` Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 22:34 ` NeilBrown
2024-01-25 23:58 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240125-flsplit-v2-37-7485322b62c7@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=aahringo@redhat.com \
--cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ericvh@kernel.org \
--cc=gfs2@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=kolga@netapp.com \
--cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
--cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
--cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
--cc=mark@fasheh.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pc@manguebit.com \
--cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=sfrench@samba.org \
--cc=sprasad@microsoft.com \
--cc=teigland@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
--cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
--cc=v9fs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xiubli@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).