From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79EC48F44; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 02:22:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.7 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706235753; cv=none; b=jPsP80WK2Z+PqxvBv1SZqJWTPsA9FABz4u7ptYGp1xIE2NhwCLYoJAHkky8inUdJ28l/p1Bu20UTu9bNuoWR37EVWzSpXA8FBO4PaKQzXzQG542gFlBPueFWmtal5nTaB0Ybub38kiB+ik9Ir5h4FFRzdqy84rZ43X5T8t0TqLc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706235753; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2MTXUGWkSU7bPTzmjrQqIqpDoQjBk+IySgrbW3tQLzw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=m8Ztfb/2fmgnh+J0VHWuVQSmkqpYloTsNwDevKG+zbScCR4PdxOvgoqRYFPGPfkwkiR4Ayi6lkXNjZW9o89XbAy35y9uVl+dgyCNsSdMv2dZKlvVWYnD7BP9YB3rqWjQhvYKg8sW/KBT6eTS63v/m9W4M3/IKSiK6OHoQQgKvHw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=OLb1KxXB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.7 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="OLb1KxXB" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1706235751; x=1737771751; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=2MTXUGWkSU7bPTzmjrQqIqpDoQjBk+IySgrbW3tQLzw=; b=OLb1KxXBggrZ/0F2w2bvjvhhoOJ1bTcecXimAyk2gqd9VYoRwvb9VOKR UU1EY2EIRWRbe4hol2RexOLdluZfo8O93zP8hEKXWd6HDjwAk8XpGA78F aH2tW9CP9ETPvrjTWxPf4zvSAyvv0TKo7SCvufZW3BsBWIjMKOhfaWzR5 2isdIv+XTs4PdV7XcmaA7WJja6a24KFHeYOZikRFU5VZHdf+6NHGz6L8y XJb/zG32CvD4JuRelK/cY3wEovrF9lK1fapAuze4Lu+I5D151Dyq7j11S q/noZndyBfcsS0mKAKRlImsuYgM+VAQPay4oSuo6obmj4fvuF2uljpY/O g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10964"; a="23823712" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,216,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="23823712" Received: from fmviesa001.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.141]) by fmvoesa101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Jan 2024 18:22:30 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,216,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="28988191" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 370188f8dc87) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Jan 2024 18:22:28 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 370188f8dc87 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rTBrO-0000bC-1z; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 02:22:26 +0000 Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 10:21:48 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Vincent Donnefort , rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, kernel-team@android.com, Vincent Donnefort Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 3/6] tracing: Add snapshot refcount Message-ID: <202401261026.Cc8uBwxf-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240123110757.3657908-4-vdonnefort@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240123110757.3657908-4-vdonnefort@google.com> Hi Vincent, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on 4f1991a92cfe89096b2d1f5583a2e093bdd55c37] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Vincent-Donnefort/ring-buffer-Zero-ring-buffer-sub-buffers/20240123-191131 base: 4f1991a92cfe89096b2d1f5583a2e093bdd55c37 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240123110757.3657908-4-vdonnefort%40google.com patch subject: [PATCH v12 3/6] tracing: Add snapshot refcount config: i386-randconfig-012-20240126 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240126/202401261026.Cc8uBwxf-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240126/202401261026.Cc8uBwxf-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401261026.Cc8uBwxf-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): kernel/trace/trace.c: In function 'tracing_set_tracer': >> kernel/trace/trace.c:6645:9: error: 'struct tracer' has no member named 'use_max_tr' 6645 | if (t->use_max_tr) | ^~ >> kernel/trace/trace.c:6646:5: error: implicit declaration of function 'tracing_disarm_snapshot_locked'; did you mean 'tracing_disarm_snapshot'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 6646 | tracing_disarm_snapshot_locked(tr); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | tracing_disarm_snapshot cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +6645 kernel/trace/trace.c 6641 6642 if (t->init) { 6643 ret = tracer_init(t, tr); 6644 if (ret) { > 6645 if (t->use_max_tr) > 6646 tracing_disarm_snapshot_locked(tr); 6647 goto out; 6648 } 6649 } 6650 6651 tr->current_trace = t; 6652 tr->current_trace->enabled++; 6653 trace_branch_enable(tr); 6654 out: 6655 mutex_unlock(&trace_types_lock); 6656 6657 return ret; 6658 } 6659 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki