From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DE3114D443; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 18:32:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706898761; cv=none; b=ZbToZplM9PofaUuZEzS2ahLsiSbHvDY3cqhjEnqQnmUsgtvd/kTjb0cYes4XfsTSs7b++iw9IZZXePX6DRGTbnh4R6TzV5BT179hfrcG2htjx++kyWzg/PQz7itasC/T0rJCxiTdUw5fm0O55SESsnt3Ag19U5fCUEuRZZ0XaZE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706898761; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LXnUA9uLDfsc51JXxSgjMp6dsTQZv+8fYhk4eTTjY8M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=WKaiUj4tnDm65a0ZMFjHY90iDG7kghCgQehWXctXRW44DShwRadtTwRuVFc73aBmse7Y8R6EiP5qhDkhT7k2U41GcvrSTTcHjMHykioEsD2G2AunzWLIyfT7M0gbGZp8SYWINldtdyzS07Qy8tBSgRMSqZWKqr7j13dsRRRsXHE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=qbr10d3m; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="qbr10d3m" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C4321C433C7; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 18:32:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1706898761; bh=LXnUA9uLDfsc51JXxSgjMp6dsTQZv+8fYhk4eTTjY8M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=qbr10d3mY2jGaUrsflP5eunrMqgkEefU3XzrTPLE6FaUw3DSk75plfuPm4qnvPkjJ ogZ7YvZaoOkrrI+zsMpfNLazFVwAyAPWzHdq6yEblCy3Yt8IG0WjYFBBZKryCO0Iuv yNWqlZ5KRaxmuOkGTjDPQVaTaVzRsdLIyia3TIOpVr3l+hWrgSaYgaeO+do6kncBHf CDVRL0jQ/uxlnZ6vey5fQPvYgaQoGdoXmuRW89I0e4l4wNw+PCeM5p6Y8vdt2V9evu l/Cg+zSm8gdRzq2j1Wu481ixBqDQ7G7mc+Q+/S7ThcNKf98TkEcmSe+6mpeMjUiglx QoZkCcgzLBF3g== Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 10:32:39 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Tobias Waldekranz Cc: davem@davemloft.net, jiri@resnulli.us, ivecera@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, roopa@nvidia.com, razor@blackwall.org, bridge@lists.linux.dev, rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/5] net: switchdev: Tracepoints Message-ID: <20240202103239.05f224c1@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <8734ubtjqa.fsf@waldekranz.com> References: <20240130201937.1897766-1-tobias@waldekranz.com> <20240201204459.60fea698@kernel.org> <8734ubtjqa.fsf@waldekranz.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 02 Feb 2024 08:21:01 +0100 Tobias Waldekranz wrote: > My idea now is to get the fix accepted, wait for the next merge of net > back to net-next, then fixup this series so that it does not reintroduce > the MDB sync issue. I already have a version of the fix that applies on > top of this series, so I'll just work it in to the switchdev refactor > steps in the next version. > > Is there a better way to go about this? No no, that's perfect! This set was still active in patchwork yesterday, tho, so we could have applied it by mistake.. If you realize there's a conflict it's worth sending a comment to the already-posted net-next series notifying maintainers of the situation.