From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Cc: regressions@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [regression] tracing: kmemleak warning in allocate_cmdlines_buffer()
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 09:46:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240214094617.1e6ec684@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r0hfnr9r.fsf@kernel.org>
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 14:50:56 +0200
Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
> I upgraded our ath11k test setup to v6.8-rc4 and noticed a new kmemleak
> warning in the log:
Thanks for the report.
>
> unreferenced object 0xffff8881010c8000 (size 32760):
> comm "swapper", pid 0, jiffies 4294667296
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
> ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
> backtrace (crc ae6ec1b9):
> [<ffffffff86722405>] kmemleak_alloc+0x45/0x80
> [<ffffffff8414028d>] __kmalloc_large_node+0x10d/0x190
> [<ffffffff84146ab1>] __kmalloc+0x3b1/0x4c0
> [<ffffffff83ed7103>] allocate_cmdlines_buffer+0x113/0x230
> [<ffffffff88649c34>] tracer_alloc_buffers.isra.0+0x124/0x460
> [<ffffffff8864a174>] early_trace_init+0x14/0xa0
> [<ffffffff885dd5ae>] start_kernel+0x12e/0x3c0
> [<ffffffff885f5758>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x18/0x30
> [<ffffffff885f582b>] x86_64_start_kernel+0x7b/0x80
> [<ffffffff83a001c3>] secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0x15e/0x16b
>
> I don't see this warning in v6.8-rc3 and also reverting commit
> 44dc5c41b5b1 ("tracing: Fix wasted memory in saved_cmdlines logic")
> makes the warning go away. Let me know if you need more info or help
> with testing, I see the warning every time so it's easy to reproduce.
>
Hmm, I changed the code a bit and I wonder if this is a false positive?
Instead of allocating the structure via kmalloc() I now use it as part of a
page.
That is, the old code had:
s = kmalloc(sizeof(*s), GFP_KERNEL);
s->saved_cmdlines = kmalloc_array(TASK_COMM_LEN, val, GFP_KERNEL);
Where as the new code has:
orig_size = sizeof(*s) + val * TASK_COMM_LEN;
order = get_order(orig_size);
size = 1 << (order + PAGE_SHIFT);
page = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, order);
if (!page)
return NULL;
s = page_address(page);
memset(s, 0, sizeof(*s));
s->saved_cmdlines = kmalloc_array(TASK_COMM_LEN, val, GFP_KERNEL);
Does kmemleak handle structures that are assigned to alloc_pages()
allocations? I don't think it does.
I think we need to inform kmemleak about this. Does the following patch fix
this for you?
-- Steve
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c b/kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c
index e4fbcc3bede5..de4182224ea2 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
#include <linux/kallsyms.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include <linux/ftrace.h>
+#include <linux/kmemleak.h>
#include <trace/events/sched.h>
#include "trace.h"
@@ -190,6 +191,7 @@ static void free_saved_cmdlines_buffer(struct saved_cmdlines_buffer *s)
int order = get_order(sizeof(*s) + s->cmdline_num * TASK_COMM_LEN);
kfree(s->map_cmdline_to_pid);
+ kmemleak_free(s);
free_pages((unsigned long)s, order);
}
@@ -210,6 +212,7 @@ static struct saved_cmdlines_buffer *allocate_cmdlines_buffer(unsigned int val)
s = page_address(page);
memset(s, 0, sizeof(*s));
+ kmemleak_alloc(s, size, 1, GFP_KERNEL);
/* Round up to actual allocation */
val = (size - sizeof(*s)) / TASK_COMM_LEN;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-14 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-14 12:50 [regression] tracing: kmemleak warning in allocate_cmdlines_buffer() Kalle Valo
2024-02-14 14:46 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2024-02-14 15:30 ` Kalle Valo
2024-02-14 15:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-02-14 16:22 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240214094617.1e6ec684@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox