From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Cc: martin.lau@linux.dev, kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, sinquersw@gmail.com, kuifeng@meta.com,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rethook: Remove warning messages printed for finding return address of a frame.
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 09:22:28 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240409092228.c8dbe901a0143f580346756b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240408175140.60223-1-thinker.li@gmail.com>
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 10:51:40 -0700
Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com> wrote:
> The function rethook_find_ret_addr() prints a warning message and returns 0
> when the target task is running and is not the "current" task in order to
> prevent the incorrect return address, although it still may return an
> incorrect address.
>
> However, the warning message turns into noise when BPF profiling programs
> call bpf_get_task_stack() on running tasks in a firm with a large number of
> hosts.
>
> The callers should be aware and willing to take the risk of receiving an
> incorrect return address from a task that is currently running other than
> the "current" one. A warning is not needed here as the callers are intent
> on it.
>
OK, looks good to me. Let me pick it to probes/for-next. Thanks!
> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
>
> ---
> Changes from v1:
>
> - Rephrased the commit log.
>
> - Removed the confusing last part of the first paragraph.
>
> - Removed "frequently" from the 2nd paragraph, replaced by "a firm with
> a large number of hosts".
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240401191621.758056-1-thinker.li@gmail.com/
> ---
> kernel/trace/rethook.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/rethook.c b/kernel/trace/rethook.c
> index fa03094e9e69..4297a132a7ae 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/rethook.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/rethook.c
> @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ unsigned long rethook_find_ret_addr(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long frame
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!cur))
> return 0;
>
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(tsk != current && task_is_running(tsk)))
> + if (tsk != current && task_is_running(tsk))
> return 0;
>
> do {
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-09 0:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-08 17:51 [PATCH v2] rethook: Remove warning messages printed for finding return address of a frame Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-09 0:22 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240409092228.c8dbe901a0143f580346756b@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
--cc=thinker.li@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).