From: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian1@huawei.com>
To: <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <zhengyejian1@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] kprobes: Fix possible use-after-free issue on kprobe registration
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 09:58:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240410015802.265220-1-zhengyejian1@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240407035904.2556645-1-zhengyejian1@huawei.com>
When unloading a module, its state is changing MODULE_STATE_LIVE ->
MODULE_STATE_GOING -> MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED. Each change will take
a time. `is_module_text_address()` and `__module_text_address()`
works with MODULE_STATE_LIVE and MODULE_STATE_GOING.
If we use `is_module_text_address()` and `__module_text_address()`
separately, there is a chance that the first one is succeeded but the
next one is failed because module->state becomes MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED
between those operations.
In `check_kprobe_address_safe()`, if the second `__module_text_address()`
is failed, that is ignored because it expected a kernel_text address.
But it may have failed simply because module->state has been changed
to MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED. In this case, arm_kprobe() will try to modify
non-exist module text address (use-after-free).
To fix this problem, we should not use separated `is_module_text_address()`
and `__module_text_address()`, but use only `__module_text_address()`
once and do `try_module_get(module)` which is only available with
MODULE_STATE_LIVE.
Signed-off-by: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian1@huawei.com>
---
kernel/kprobes.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
v3:
- Update commit messages as suggested by Masami.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240409224922.5f192e8ace5f7a90937bfa69@kernel.org/
- Also change to a more appropriate title.
v2:
- Update commit messages and comments as suggested by Masami.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240408115038.b0c85767bf1f249eccc32fff@kernel.org/
- Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240408083403.3302274-1-zhengyejian1@huawei.com/
v1:
- Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240407035904.2556645-1-zhengyejian1@huawei.com/
diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
index 9d9095e81792..65adc815fc6e 100644
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -1567,10 +1567,17 @@ static int check_kprobe_address_safe(struct kprobe *p,
jump_label_lock();
preempt_disable();
- /* Ensure it is not in reserved area nor out of text */
- if (!(core_kernel_text((unsigned long) p->addr) ||
- is_module_text_address((unsigned long) p->addr)) ||
- in_gate_area_no_mm((unsigned long) p->addr) ||
+ /* Ensure the address is in a text area, and find a module if exists. */
+ *probed_mod = NULL;
+ if (!core_kernel_text((unsigned long) p->addr)) {
+ *probed_mod = __module_text_address((unsigned long) p->addr);
+ if (!(*probed_mod)) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ }
+ /* Ensure it is not in reserved area. */
+ if (in_gate_area_no_mm((unsigned long) p->addr) ||
within_kprobe_blacklist((unsigned long) p->addr) ||
jump_label_text_reserved(p->addr, p->addr) ||
static_call_text_reserved(p->addr, p->addr) ||
@@ -1580,8 +1587,7 @@ static int check_kprobe_address_safe(struct kprobe *p,
goto out;
}
- /* Check if 'p' is probing a module. */
- *probed_mod = __module_text_address((unsigned long) p->addr);
+ /* Get module refcount and reject __init functions for loaded modules. */
if (*probed_mod) {
/*
* We must hold a refcount of the probed module while updating
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-10 1:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-07 3:59 [PATCH] kprobes: Fix possible warn in __arm_kprobe_ftrace() Zheng Yejian
2024-04-08 2:50 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-08 3:29 ` Zheng Yejian
2024-04-08 8:34 ` [PATCH v2] kprobes: Avoid " Zheng Yejian
2024-04-08 12:41 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-09 6:20 ` Zheng Yejian
2024-04-09 13:49 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-10 1:44 ` Zheng Yejian
2024-04-10 1:58 ` Zheng Yejian [this message]
2024-04-10 14:03 ` [PATCH v3] kprobes: Fix possible use-after-free issue on kprobe registration Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240410015802.265220-1-zhengyejian1@huawei.com \
--to=zhengyejian1@huawei.com \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).