From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ftrace: make extra rcu_is_watching() validation check optional
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 07:49:41 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240410074941.7182e5b8ce2113227709c7fc@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240403220328.455786-1-andrii@kernel.org>
On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 15:03:27 -0700
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> wrote:
> Introduce CONFIG_FTRACE_VALIDATE_RCU_IS_WATCHING config option to
> control whether ftrace low-level code performs additional
> rcu_is_watching()-based validation logic in an attempt to catch noinstr
> violations.
>
> This check is expected to never be true and is mostly useful for
> low-level validation of ftrace subsystem invariants. For most users it
> should probably be kept disabled to eliminate unnecessary runtime
> overhead.
>
> This improves BPF multi-kretprobe (relying on ftrace and rethook
> infrastructure) runtime throughput by 2%, according to BPF benchmarks ([0]).
>
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzauQ2WKMjZdc9s0rBWa01BYbgwHN6aNDXQSHYia47pQ-w@mail.gmail.com/
>
This looks good to me :)
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Thank you,
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> ---
> include/linux/trace_recursion.h | 2 +-
> kernel/trace/Kconfig | 13 +++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/trace_recursion.h b/include/linux/trace_recursion.h
> index d48cd92d2364..24ea8ac049b4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/trace_recursion.h
> +++ b/include/linux/trace_recursion.h
> @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ extern void ftrace_record_recursion(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip);
> # define do_ftrace_record_recursion(ip, pip) do { } while (0)
> #endif
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANTS_NO_INSTR
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FTRACE_VALIDATE_RCU_IS_WATCHING
> # define trace_warn_on_no_rcu(ip) \
> ({ \
> bool __ret = !rcu_is_watching(); \
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/Kconfig b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> index 61c541c36596..7aebd1b8f93e 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> @@ -974,6 +974,19 @@ config FTRACE_RECORD_RECURSION_SIZE
> This file can be reset, but the limit can not change in
> size at runtime.
>
> +config FTRACE_VALIDATE_RCU_IS_WATCHING
> + bool "Validate RCU is on during ftrace execution"
> + depends on FUNCTION_TRACER
> + depends on ARCH_WANTS_NO_INSTR
> + help
> + All callbacks that attach to the function tracing have some sort of
> + protection against recursion. This option is only to verify that
> + ftrace (and other users of ftrace_test_recursion_trylock()) are not
> + called outside of RCU, as if they are, it can cause a race. But it
> + also has a noticeable overhead when enabled.
> +
> + If unsure, say N
> +
> config RING_BUFFER_RECORD_RECURSION
> bool "Record functions that recurse in the ring buffer"
> depends on FTRACE_RECORD_RECURSION
> --
> 2.43.0
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-09 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-03 22:03 [PATCH v3 1/2] ftrace: make extra rcu_is_watching() validation check optional Andrii Nakryiko
2024-04-03 22:03 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] rethook: honor CONFIG_FTRACE_VALIDATE_RCU_IS_WATCHING in rethook_try_get() Andrii Nakryiko
2024-04-09 22:48 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-18 18:41 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-04-09 22:49 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240410074941.7182e5b8ce2113227709c7fc@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).