From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
To: edumazet@google.com, dsahern@kernel.org, matttbe@kernel.org,
martineau@kernel.org, geliang@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, rostedt@goodmis.org,
mhiramat@kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
atenart@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org
Cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kerneljasonxing@gmail.com,
Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v8 1/7] net: introduce rstreason to detect why the RST is sent
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 15:21:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240423072137.65168-2-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240423072137.65168-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Add a new standalone file for the easy future extension to support
both active reset and passive reset in the TCP/DCCP/MPTCP protocols.
This patch only does the preparations for reset reason mechanism,
nothing else changes.
The reset reasons are divided into three parts:
1) reuse drop reasons for passive reset in TCP
2) our own independent reasons which aren't relying on other reasons at all
3) reuse MP_TCPRST option for MPTCP
The benefits of a standalone reset reason are listed here:
1) it can cover more than one case, such as reset reasons in MPTCP,
active reset reasons.
2) people can easily/fastly understand and maintain this mechanism.
3) we get unified format of output with prefix stripped.
4) more new reset reasons are on the way
...
I will implement the basic codes of active/passive reset reason in
those three protocols, which are not complete for this moment. For
passive reset part in TCP, I only introduce the NO_SOCKET common case
which could be set as an example.
After this series applied, it will have the ability to open a new
gate to let other people contribute more reasons into it :)
Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
---
include/net/rstreason.h | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 106 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 include/net/rstreason.h
diff --git a/include/net/rstreason.h b/include/net/rstreason.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..bc53b5a24505
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/net/rstreason.h
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
+
+#ifndef _LINUX_RSTREASON_H
+#define _LINUX_RSTREASON_H
+#include <net/dropreason-core.h>
+#include <uapi/linux/mptcp.h>
+
+#define DEFINE_RST_REASON(FN, FNe) \
+ FN(NOT_SPECIFIED) \
+ FN(NO_SOCKET) \
+ FN(MPTCP_RST_EUNSPEC) \
+ FN(MPTCP_RST_EMPTCP) \
+ FN(MPTCP_RST_ERESOURCE) \
+ FN(MPTCP_RST_EPROHIBIT) \
+ FN(MPTCP_RST_EWQ2BIG) \
+ FN(MPTCP_RST_EBADPERF) \
+ FN(MPTCP_RST_EMIDDLEBOX) \
+ FN(ERROR) \
+ FNe(MAX)
+
+/**
+ * enum sk_rst_reason - the reasons of socket reset
+ *
+ * The reasons of sk reset, which are used in DCCP/TCP/MPTCP protocols.
+ *
+ * There are three parts in order:
+ * 1) skb drop reasons: relying on drop reasons for such as passive reset
+ * 2) independent reset reasons: such as active reset reasons
+ * 3) reset reasons in MPTCP: only for MPTCP use
+ */
+enum sk_rst_reason {
+ /* Refer to include/net/dropreason-core.h
+ * Rely on skb drop reasons because it indicates exactly why RST
+ * could happen.
+ */
+ /** @SK_RST_REASON_NOT_SPECIFIED: reset reason is not specified */
+ SK_RST_REASON_NOT_SPECIFIED,
+ /** @SK_RST_REASON_NO_SOCKET: no valid socket that can be used */
+ SK_RST_REASON_NO_SOCKET,
+
+ /* Copy from include/uapi/linux/mptcp.h.
+ * These reset fields will not be changed since they adhere to
+ * RFC 8684. So do not touch them. I'm going to list each definition
+ * of them respectively.
+ */
+ /**
+ * @SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EUNSPEC: Unspecified error.
+ * This is the default error; it implies that the subflow is no
+ * longer available. The presence of this option shows that the
+ * RST was generated by an MPTCP-aware device.
+ */
+ SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EUNSPEC,
+ /**
+ * @SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EMPTCP: MPTCP-specific error.
+ * An error has been detected in the processing of MPTCP options.
+ * This is the usual reason code to return in the cases where a RST
+ * is being sent to close a subflow because of an invalid response.
+ */
+ SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EMPTCP,
+ /**
+ * @SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_ERESOURCE: Lack of resources.
+ * This code indicates that the sending host does not have enough
+ * resources to support the terminated subflow.
+ */
+ SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_ERESOURCE,
+ /**
+ * @SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EPROHIBIT: Administratively prohibited.
+ * This code indicates that the requested subflow is prohibited by
+ * the policies of the sending host.
+ */
+ SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EPROHIBIT,
+ /**
+ * @SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EWQ2BIG: Too much outstanding data.
+ * This code indicates that there is an excessive amount of data
+ * that needs to be transmitted over the terminated subflow while
+ * having already been acknowledged over one or more other subflows.
+ * This may occur if a path has been unavailable for a short period
+ * and it is more efficient to reset and start again than it is to
+ * retransmit the queued data.
+ */
+ SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EWQ2BIG,
+ /**
+ * @SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EBADPERF: Unacceptable performance.
+ * This code indicates that the performance of this subflow was
+ * too low compared to the other subflows of this Multipath TCP
+ * connection.
+ */
+ SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EBADPERF,
+ /**
+ * @SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EMIDDLEBOX: Middlebox interference.
+ * Middlebox interference has been detected over this subflow,
+ * making MPTCP signaling invalid. For example, this may be sent
+ * if the checksum does not validate.
+ */
+ SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EMIDDLEBOX,
+
+ /** @SK_RST_REASON_ERROR: unexpected error happens */
+ SK_RST_REASON_ERROR,
+
+ /**
+ * @SK_RST_REASON_MAX: Maximum of socket reset reasons.
+ * It shouldn't be used as a real 'reason'.
+ */
+ SK_RST_REASON_MAX,
+};
+#endif
--
2.37.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-23 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-23 7:21 [PATCH net-next v8 0/7] Implement reset reason mechanism to detect Jason Xing
2024-04-23 7:21 ` Jason Xing [this message]
2024-04-23 9:59 ` [PATCH net-next v8 1/7] net: introduce rstreason to detect why the RST is sent Matthieu Baerts
2024-04-23 7:21 ` [PATCH net-next v8 2/7] rstreason: prepare for passive reset Jason Xing
2024-04-23 10:00 ` Matthieu Baerts
2024-04-23 7:21 ` [PATCH net-next v8 3/7] rstreason: prepare for active reset Jason Xing
2024-04-23 10:00 ` Matthieu Baerts
2024-04-23 7:21 ` [PATCH net-next v8 4/7] tcp: support rstreason for passive reset Jason Xing
2024-04-23 7:21 ` [PATCH net-next v8 5/7] mptcp: " Jason Xing
2024-04-23 10:02 ` Matthieu Baerts
2024-04-23 10:57 ` Jason Xing
2024-04-23 7:21 ` [PATCH net-next v8 6/7] mptcp: introducing a helper into active reset logic Jason Xing
2024-04-23 10:02 ` Matthieu Baerts
2024-04-23 7:21 ` [PATCH net-next v8 7/7] rstreason: make it work in trace world Jason Xing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240423072137.65168-2-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--to=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=atenart@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=geliang@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martineau@kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).