Re: [PATCH v2 11/27] ftrace: Allow subops filtering to be modified

[Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>]

On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 11:37:23 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Sat, 01 Jun 2024 23:37:55 -0400
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> 
> [...]
> >  
> > +static int ftrace_hash_move_and_update_subops(struct ftrace_ops *subops,
> > +					      struct ftrace_hash **orig_subhash,
> > +					      struct ftrace_hash *hash,
> > +					      int enable)
> > +{
> > +	struct ftrace_ops *ops = subops->managed;
> > +	struct ftrace_hash **orig_hash;
> > +	struct ftrace_hash *save_hash;
> > +	struct ftrace_hash *new_hash;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	/* Manager ops can not be subops (yet) */
> > +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ops || ops->flags & FTRACE_OPS_FL_SUBOP))
> > +		return -EINVAL;  
> 
> This does return if ops->flags & FTRACE_OPS_FL_SUBOP, but --> (1)

Yes, because what is passed in is "subops" and "ops" is subops->managed.

> 
> > +
> > +	/* Move the new hash over to the subops hash */
> > +	save_hash = *orig_subhash;
> > +	*orig_subhash = __ftrace_hash_move(hash);
> > +	if (!*orig_subhash) {
> > +		*orig_subhash = save_hash;
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* Create a new_hash to hold the ops new functions */
> > +	if (enable) {
> > +		orig_hash = &ops->func_hash->filter_hash;
> > +		new_hash = append_hashes(ops);
> > +	} else {
> > +		orig_hash = &ops->func_hash->notrace_hash;
> > +		new_hash = intersect_hashes(ops);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* Move the hash over to the new hash */
> > +	ret = ftrace_hash_move_and_update_ops(ops, orig_hash, new_hash, enable);  
> 
> This also a bit wired to me. maybe we need simple version like
> 
> `__ftrace_hash_move_and_update_ops()`
> 
> And call it from ftrace_hash_move_and_update_ops() and here?

We could do that. I almost did due to other issues but I reworked the code
where I didn't need to.

> 
> > +
> > +	free_ftrace_hash(new_hash);
> > +
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		/* Put back the original hash */
> > +		free_ftrace_hash_rcu(*orig_subhash);
> > +		*orig_subhash = save_hash;
> > +	} else {
> > +		free_ftrace_hash_rcu(save_hash);
> > +	}
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +
> >  static u64		ftrace_update_time;
> >  unsigned long		ftrace_update_tot_cnt;
> >  unsigned long		ftrace_number_of_pages;
> > @@ -4770,8 +4823,33 @@ static int ftrace_hash_move_and_update_ops(struct ftrace_ops *ops,
> >  {
> >  	struct ftrace_ops_hash old_hash_ops;
> >  	struct ftrace_hash *old_hash;
> > +	struct ftrace_ops *op;
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> > +	if (ops->flags & FTRACE_OPS_FL_SUBOP)
> > +		return ftrace_hash_move_and_update_subops(ops, orig_hash, hash, enable);  
> 
> (1) This calls ftrace_hash_move_and_update_subops() if ops->flags & FTRACE_OPS_FL_SUBOP ?

Yes, because ops turns into subops, and the ops above it is its manager ops.

-- Steve