linux-trace-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-man@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@alien8.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	"Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 bpf-next 8/9] selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe shadow stack test
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 07:02:12 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240611070212.79cef453d0615e3af5af1fb0@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240523121149.575616-9-jolsa@kernel.org>

On Thu, 23 May 2024 14:11:48 +0200
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote:

> Adding uretprobe shadow stack test that runs all existing
> uretprobe tests with shadow stack enabled if it's available.
> 

According to the document and sample code, this looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

Thanks,

> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> ---
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 60 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
> index 3ef324c2db50..fda456401284 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,9 @@
>  #include <linux/compiler.h>
>  #include <linux/stringify.h>
>  #include <sys/wait.h>
> +#include <sys/syscall.h>
> +#include <sys/prctl.h>
> +#include <asm/prctl.h>
>  #include "uprobe_syscall.skel.h"
>  #include "uprobe_syscall_executed.skel.h"
>  
> @@ -297,6 +300,56 @@ static void test_uretprobe_syscall_call(void)
>  	close(go[1]);
>  	close(go[0]);
>  }
> +
> +/*
> + * Borrowed from tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_shadow_stack.c.
> + *
> + * For use in inline enablement of shadow stack.
> + *
> + * The program can't return from the point where shadow stack gets enabled
> + * because there will be no address on the shadow stack. So it can't use
> + * syscall() for enablement, since it is a function.
> + *
> + * Based on code from nolibc.h. Keep a copy here because this can't pull
> + * in all of nolibc.h.
> + */
> +#define ARCH_PRCTL(arg1, arg2)					\
> +({								\
> +	long _ret;						\
> +	register long _num  asm("eax") = __NR_arch_prctl;	\
> +	register long _arg1 asm("rdi") = (long)(arg1);		\
> +	register long _arg2 asm("rsi") = (long)(arg2);		\
> +								\
> +	asm volatile (						\
> +		"syscall\n"					\
> +		: "=a"(_ret)					\
> +		: "r"(_arg1), "r"(_arg2),			\
> +		  "0"(_num)					\
> +		: "rcx", "r11", "memory", "cc"			\
> +	);							\
> +	_ret;							\
> +})
> +
> +#ifndef ARCH_SHSTK_ENABLE
> +#define ARCH_SHSTK_ENABLE	0x5001
> +#define ARCH_SHSTK_DISABLE	0x5002
> +#define ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK	(1ULL <<  0)
> +#endif
> +
> +static void test_uretprobe_shadow_stack(void)
> +{
> +	if (ARCH_PRCTL(ARCH_SHSTK_ENABLE, ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK)) {
> +		test__skip();
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Run all of the uretprobe tests. */
> +	test_uretprobe_regs_equal();
> +	test_uretprobe_regs_change();
> +	test_uretprobe_syscall_call();
> +
> +	ARCH_PRCTL(ARCH_SHSTK_DISABLE, ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK);
> +}
>  #else
>  static void test_uretprobe_regs_equal(void)
>  {
> @@ -312,6 +365,11 @@ static void test_uretprobe_syscall_call(void)
>  {
>  	test__skip();
>  }
> +
> +static void test_uretprobe_shadow_stack(void)
> +{
> +	test__skip();
> +}
>  #endif
>  
>  void test_uprobe_syscall(void)
> @@ -322,4 +380,6 @@ void test_uprobe_syscall(void)
>  		test_uretprobe_regs_change();
>  	if (test__start_subtest("uretprobe_syscall_call"))
>  		test_uretprobe_syscall_call();
> +	if (test__start_subtest("uretprobe_shadow_stack"))
> +		test_uretprobe_shadow_stack();
>  }
> -- 
> 2.45.1
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-10 22:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-23 12:11 [PATCHv7 bpf-next 0/9] uprobe: uretprobe speed up Jiri Olsa
2024-05-23 12:11 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 1/9] x86/shstk: Make return uprobe work with shadow stack Jiri Olsa
2024-05-23 12:11 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 2/9] uprobe: Wire up uretprobe system call Jiri Olsa
2024-06-10 22:05   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-06-11  7:44     ` Jiri Olsa
2024-05-23 12:11 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 3/9] uprobe: Add uretprobe syscall to speed up return probe Jiri Olsa
2024-05-23 12:11 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 4/9] selftests/x86: Add return uprobe shadow stack test Jiri Olsa
2024-05-23 12:11 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 5/9] selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe syscall test for regs integrity Jiri Olsa
2024-05-23 12:11 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 6/9] selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe syscall test for regs changes Jiri Olsa
2024-05-23 12:11 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 7/9] selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe syscall call from user space test Jiri Olsa
2024-05-23 12:11 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 8/9] selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe shadow stack test Jiri Olsa
2024-06-10 22:02   ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2024-05-23 12:11 ` [PATCHv7 9/9] man2: Add uretprobe syscall page Jiri Olsa
2024-05-31 17:52 ` [PATCHv7 bpf-next 0/9] uprobe: uretprobe speed up Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-05 16:42   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-10 15:16     ` Steven Rostedt
2024-06-10 21:46     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-06-11  8:30       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-11 14:25         ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240611070212.79cef453d0615e3af5af1fb0@kernel.org \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=debug@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).