* [PATCH] uprobe: Do not use UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as static initializer
@ 2024-06-18 19:43 Jiri Olsa
2024-06-20 19:00 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-27 16:02 ` [PATCH] LoongArch: uprobes: make UPROBE_SWBP_INSN/UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN constant Oleg Nesterov
0 siblings, 2 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2024-06-18 19:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu, Andrii Nakryiko
Cc: Oleg Nesterov, Nathan Chancellor, linux-kernel,
linux-trace-kernel, bpf
Nathan reported compilation fail for loongarch arch:
kernel/events/uprobes.c: In function 'arch_uprobe_trampoline':
arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h:12:33: error: initializer element is not constant
12 | #define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/events/uprobes.c:1479:39: note: in expansion of macro 'UPROBE_SWBP_INSN'
1479 | static uprobe_opcode_t insn = UPROBE_SWBP_INSN;
Loongarch defines UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as function call, so we can't
use it to initialize static variable.
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Fixes: ff474a78cef5 ("uprobe: Add uretprobe syscall to speed up return probe")
Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 2816e65729ac..6986bd993702 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -1476,8 +1476,9 @@ static int xol_add_vma(struct mm_struct *mm, struct xol_area *area)
void * __weak arch_uprobe_trampoline(unsigned long *psize)
{
- static uprobe_opcode_t insn = UPROBE_SWBP_INSN;
+ static uprobe_opcode_t insn;
+ insn = insn ?: UPROBE_SWBP_INSN;
*psize = UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE;
return &insn;
}
--
2.45.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] uprobe: Do not use UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as static initializer
2024-06-18 19:43 [PATCH] uprobe: Do not use UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as static initializer Jiri Olsa
@ 2024-06-20 19:00 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-20 19:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-27 16:02 ` [PATCH] LoongArch: uprobes: make UPROBE_SWBP_INSN/UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN constant Oleg Nesterov
1 sibling, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2024-06-20 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiri Olsa
Cc: Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu, Andrii Nakryiko, Oleg Nesterov,
Nathan Chancellor, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, bpf
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 12:43 PM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Nathan reported compilation fail for loongarch arch:
>
> kernel/events/uprobes.c: In function 'arch_uprobe_trampoline':
> arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h:12:33: error: initializer element is not constant
> 12 | #define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> kernel/events/uprobes.c:1479:39: note: in expansion of macro 'UPROBE_SWBP_INSN'
> 1479 | static uprobe_opcode_t insn = UPROBE_SWBP_INSN;
>
> Loongarch defines UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as function call, so we can't
> use it to initialize static variable.
>
> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> Fixes: ff474a78cef5 ("uprobe: Add uretprobe syscall to speed up return probe")
> Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> ---
> kernel/events/uprobes.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
Can we instead ask loongarch folks to rewrite it to be a constant?
Having this as a function call is both an inconvenience and potential
performance problem (a minor one, but still). I would imagine it's not
hard to hard-code an instruction as a constant here.
> diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> index 2816e65729ac..6986bd993702 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> @@ -1476,8 +1476,9 @@ static int xol_add_vma(struct mm_struct *mm, struct xol_area *area)
>
> void * __weak arch_uprobe_trampoline(unsigned long *psize)
> {
> - static uprobe_opcode_t insn = UPROBE_SWBP_INSN;
> + static uprobe_opcode_t insn;
>
> + insn = insn ?: UPROBE_SWBP_INSN;
> *psize = UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE;
> return &insn;
> }
> --
> 2.45.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] uprobe: Do not use UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as static initializer
2024-06-20 19:00 ` Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2024-06-20 19:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-20 21:30 ` Andrii Nakryiko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2024-06-20 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrii Nakryiko
Cc: Jiri Olsa, Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu, Andrii Nakryiko,
Nathan Chancellor, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, bpf
On 06/20, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>
> Can we instead ask loongarch folks to rewrite it to be a constant?
> Having this as a function call is both an inconvenience and potential
> performance problem (a minor one, but still). I would imagine it's not
> hard to hard-code an instruction as a constant here.
I was going to ask the same question when I saw the bug report ;)
The same for other users of larch_insn_gen_break().
But I can't understand what does it do, it calls emit_break() and
git grep -w emit_break finds nothing.
Oleg.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] uprobe: Do not use UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as static initializer
2024-06-20 19:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
@ 2024-06-20 21:30 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-21 12:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2024-06-20 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Jiri Olsa, Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu, Andrii Nakryiko,
Nathan Chancellor, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, bpf
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 12:40 PM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 06/20, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> >
> > Can we instead ask loongarch folks to rewrite it to be a constant?
> > Having this as a function call is both an inconvenience and potential
> > performance problem (a minor one, but still). I would imagine it's not
> > hard to hard-code an instruction as a constant here.
>
> I was going to ask the same question when I saw the bug report ;)
> The same for other users of larch_insn_gen_break().
>
> But I can't understand what does it do, it calls emit_break() and
> git grep -w emit_break finds nothing.
>
It's DEF_EMIT_REG0I15_FORMAT(break, break_op) in
arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h
A bunch of macro magic, but in the end it produces some constant
value, of course.
> Oleg.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] uprobe: Do not use UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as static initializer
2024-06-20 21:30 ` Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2024-06-21 12:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-21 13:17 ` Jiri Olsa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2024-06-21 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrii Nakryiko
Cc: Jiri Olsa, Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu, Andrii Nakryiko,
Nathan Chancellor, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, bpf
On 06/20, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 12:40 PM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > But I can't understand what does it do, it calls emit_break() and
> > git grep -w emit_break finds nothing.
> >
>
> It's DEF_EMIT_REG0I15_FORMAT(break, break_op) in
> arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h
>
> A bunch of macro magic, but in the end it produces some constant
> value, of course.
I see, thanks!
Then perhaps something like below?
Oleg.
--- x/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h
+++ x/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ typedef u32 uprobe_opcode_t;
#define MAX_UINSN_BYTES 8
#define UPROBE_XOL_SLOT_BYTES MAX_UINSN_BYTES
-#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP)
+#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN (uprobe_opcode_t)(BRK_UPROBE_BP | (break_op << 15))
#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE LOONGARCH_INSN_SIZE
#define UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP)
--- x/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c
+++ x/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c
@@ -7,6 +7,13 @@
#define UPROBE_TRAP_NR UINT_MAX
+static __init int __ck_insn(void)
+{
+ BUG_ON(UPROBE_SWBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP));
+ return 0;
+}
+late_initcall(__ck_insn);
+
int arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe,
struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
{
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] uprobe: Do not use UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as static initializer
2024-06-21 12:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
@ 2024-06-21 13:17 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-06-27 13:44 ` Jiri Olsa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2024-06-21 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleg Nesterov, Huacai Chen, WANG Xuerui
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko, Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu,
Andrii Nakryiko, Nathan Chancellor, linux-kernel,
linux-trace-kernel, bpf, loongarch
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 02:01:50PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 06/20, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 12:40 PM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > But I can't understand what does it do, it calls emit_break() and
> > > git grep -w emit_break finds nothing.
> > >
> >
> > It's DEF_EMIT_REG0I15_FORMAT(break, break_op) in
> > arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h
> >
> > A bunch of macro magic, but in the end it produces some constant
> > value, of course.
>
> I see, thanks!
>
> Then perhaps something like below?
lgtm, added loong arch list/folks
for context:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240614174822.GA1185149@thelio-3990X/
thanks,
jirka
>
> Oleg.
>
>
> --- x/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h
> +++ x/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ typedef u32 uprobe_opcode_t;
> #define MAX_UINSN_BYTES 8
> #define UPROBE_XOL_SLOT_BYTES MAX_UINSN_BYTES
>
> -#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP)
> +#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN (uprobe_opcode_t)(BRK_UPROBE_BP | (break_op << 15))
> #define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE LOONGARCH_INSN_SIZE
>
> #define UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP)
> --- x/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c
> +++ x/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,13 @@
>
> #define UPROBE_TRAP_NR UINT_MAX
>
> +static __init int __ck_insn(void)
> +{
> + BUG_ON(UPROBE_SWBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP));
> + return 0;
> +}
> +late_initcall(__ck_insn);
> +
> int arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe,
> struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
> {
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] uprobe: Do not use UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as static initializer
2024-06-21 13:17 ` Jiri Olsa
@ 2024-06-27 13:44 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-06-27 14:20 ` Masami Hiramatsu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2024-06-27 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiri Olsa
Cc: Oleg Nesterov, Huacai Chen, WANG Xuerui, Andrii Nakryiko,
Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu, Andrii Nakryiko,
Nathan Chancellor, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, bpf,
loongarch
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 03:17:58PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 02:01:50PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 06/20, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 12:40 PM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > But I can't understand what does it do, it calls emit_break() and
> > > > git grep -w emit_break finds nothing.
> > > >
> > >
> > > It's DEF_EMIT_REG0I15_FORMAT(break, break_op) in
> > > arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h
> > >
> > > A bunch of macro magic, but in the end it produces some constant
> > > value, of course.
> >
> > I see, thanks!
> >
> > Then perhaps something like below?
>
> lgtm, added loong arch list/folks
ping
Oleg, do you want to send formal patch?
thanks,
jirka
>
> for context:
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240614174822.GA1185149@thelio-3990X/
>
> thanks,
> jirka
>
> >
> > Oleg.
> >
> >
> > --- x/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h
> > +++ x/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h
> > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ typedef u32 uprobe_opcode_t;
> > #define MAX_UINSN_BYTES 8
> > #define UPROBE_XOL_SLOT_BYTES MAX_UINSN_BYTES
> >
> > -#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP)
> > +#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN (uprobe_opcode_t)(BRK_UPROBE_BP | (break_op << 15))
> > #define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE LOONGARCH_INSN_SIZE
> >
> > #define UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP)
> > --- x/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c
> > +++ x/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c
> > @@ -7,6 +7,13 @@
> >
> > #define UPROBE_TRAP_NR UINT_MAX
> >
> > +static __init int __ck_insn(void)
> > +{
> > + BUG_ON(UPROBE_SWBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP));
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +late_initcall(__ck_insn);
> > +
> > int arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe,
> > struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
> > {
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] uprobe: Do not use UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as static initializer
2024-06-27 13:44 ` Jiri Olsa
@ 2024-06-27 14:20 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-06-27 15:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Masami Hiramatsu @ 2024-06-27 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiri Olsa
Cc: Oleg Nesterov, Huacai Chen, WANG Xuerui, Andrii Nakryiko,
Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu, Andrii Nakryiko,
Nathan Chancellor, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, bpf,
loongarch
On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 15:44:16 +0200
Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 03:17:58PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 02:01:50PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > On 06/20, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 12:40 PM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > But I can't understand what does it do, it calls emit_break() and
> > > > > git grep -w emit_break finds nothing.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > It's DEF_EMIT_REG0I15_FORMAT(break, break_op) in
> > > > arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h
> > > >
> > > > A bunch of macro magic, but in the end it produces some constant
> > > > value, of course.
> > >
> > > I see, thanks!
> > >
> > > Then perhaps something like below?
> >
> > lgtm, added loong arch list/folks
>
> ping
>
> Oleg, do you want to send formal patch?
>
> thanks,
> jirka
Yes, can you send v2 patch?
Thank you,
>
> >
> > for context:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240614174822.GA1185149@thelio-3990X/
> >
> > thanks,
> > jirka
> >
> > >
> > > Oleg.
> > >
> > >
> > > --- x/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h
> > > +++ x/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h
> > > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ typedef u32 uprobe_opcode_t;
> > > #define MAX_UINSN_BYTES 8
> > > #define UPROBE_XOL_SLOT_BYTES MAX_UINSN_BYTES
> > >
> > > -#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP)
> > > +#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN (uprobe_opcode_t)(BRK_UPROBE_BP | (break_op << 15))
> > > #define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE LOONGARCH_INSN_SIZE
> > >
> > > #define UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP)
> > > --- x/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c
> > > +++ x/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c
> > > @@ -7,6 +7,13 @@
> > >
> > > #define UPROBE_TRAP_NR UINT_MAX
> > >
> > > +static __init int __ck_insn(void)
> > > +{
> > > + BUG_ON(UPROBE_SWBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP));
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +late_initcall(__ck_insn);
> > > +
> > > int arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe,
> > > struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
> > > {
> > >
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] uprobe: Do not use UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as static initializer
2024-06-27 14:20 ` Masami Hiramatsu
@ 2024-06-27 15:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2024-06-27 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Masami Hiramatsu
Cc: Jiri Olsa, Huacai Chen, WANG Xuerui, Andrii Nakryiko,
Steven Rostedt, Andrii Nakryiko, Nathan Chancellor, linux-kernel,
linux-trace-kernel, bpf, loongarch
On 06/27, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 15:44:16 +0200
> Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Oleg, do you want to send formal patch?
> >
> > thanks,
> > jirka
>
> Yes, can you send v2 patch?
I was waiting for the comments from loongarch maintainers...
OK, will do today, but the patch won't be even compile tested.
Oleg.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] LoongArch: uprobes: make UPROBE_SWBP_INSN/UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN constant
2024-06-18 19:43 [PATCH] uprobe: Do not use UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as static initializer Jiri Olsa
2024-06-20 19:00 ` Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2024-06-27 16:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-27 16:51 ` Andrii Nakryiko
1 sibling, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2024-06-27 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tiezhu Yang, Jiri Olsa, Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko, Nathan Chancellor, linux-kernel,
linux-trace-kernel, bpf, Huacai Chen, WANG Xuerui, loongarch
LoongArch defines UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as a function call and this breaks
arch_uprobe_trampoline() which uses it to initialize a static variable.
Fixes: ff474a78cef5 ("uprobe: Add uretprobe syscall to speed up return probe")
Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240614174822.GA1185149@thelio-3990X/
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h | 6 ++++--
arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c | 8 ++++++++
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h
index c8f59983f702..18221eb9a8b0 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h
+++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h
@@ -6,13 +6,15 @@
typedef u32 uprobe_opcode_t;
+#define __emit_break(imm) (uprobe_opcode_t)((imm) | (break_op << 15))
+
#define MAX_UINSN_BYTES 8
#define UPROBE_XOL_SLOT_BYTES MAX_UINSN_BYTES
-#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP)
+#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN __emit_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP)
#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE LOONGARCH_INSN_SIZE
-#define UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP)
+#define UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN __emit_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP)
struct arch_uprobe {
unsigned long resume_era;
diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c
index 87abc7137b73..90462d94c28f 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c
+++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c
@@ -7,6 +7,14 @@
#define UPROBE_TRAP_NR UINT_MAX
+static __init int check_emit_break(void)
+{
+ BUG_ON(UPROBE_SWBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP));
+ BUG_ON(UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP));
+ return 0;
+}
+arch_initcall(check_emit_break);
+
int arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe,
struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
{
--
2.25.1.362.g51ebf55
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: uprobes: make UPROBE_SWBP_INSN/UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN constant
2024-06-27 16:02 ` [PATCH] LoongArch: uprobes: make UPROBE_SWBP_INSN/UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN constant Oleg Nesterov
@ 2024-06-27 16:51 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-27 17:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2024-06-27 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Tiezhu Yang, Jiri Olsa, Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu,
Andrii Nakryiko, Nathan Chancellor, linux-kernel,
linux-trace-kernel, bpf, Huacai Chen, WANG Xuerui, loongarch
On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 9:04 AM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> LoongArch defines UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as a function call and this breaks
> arch_uprobe_trampoline() which uses it to initialize a static variable.
>
> Fixes: ff474a78cef5 ("uprobe: Add uretprobe syscall to speed up return probe")
> Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240614174822.GA1185149@thelio-3990X/
> Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h | 6 ++++--
> arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c | 8 ++++++++
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
LGTM.
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h
> index c8f59983f702..18221eb9a8b0 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h
> @@ -6,13 +6,15 @@
>
> typedef u32 uprobe_opcode_t;
>
> +#define __emit_break(imm) (uprobe_opcode_t)((imm) | (break_op << 15))
> +
> #define MAX_UINSN_BYTES 8
> #define UPROBE_XOL_SLOT_BYTES MAX_UINSN_BYTES
>
> -#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP)
> +#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN __emit_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP)
> #define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE LOONGARCH_INSN_SIZE
>
> -#define UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP)
> +#define UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN __emit_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP)
>
this looks correct (but based on pure code inspection)
> struct arch_uprobe {
> unsigned long resume_era;
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c
> index 87abc7137b73..90462d94c28f 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,14 @@
>
> #define UPROBE_TRAP_NR UINT_MAX
>
> +static __init int check_emit_break(void)
> +{
> + BUG_ON(UPROBE_SWBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP));
> + BUG_ON(UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP));
> + return 0;
> +}
> +arch_initcall(check_emit_break);
> +
I wouldn't even bother with this, but whatever.
> int arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe,
> struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
> {
> --
> 2.25.1.362.g51ebf55
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: uprobes: make UPROBE_SWBP_INSN/UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN constant
2024-06-27 16:51 ` Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2024-06-27 17:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-28 4:30 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-06-29 12:48 ` Tiezhu Yang
0 siblings, 2 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2024-06-27 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrii Nakryiko
Cc: Tiezhu Yang, Jiri Olsa, Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu,
Andrii Nakryiko, Nathan Chancellor, linux-kernel,
linux-trace-kernel, bpf, Huacai Chen, WANG Xuerui, loongarch
On 06/27, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>
> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Thanks!
> > --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c
> > +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c
> > @@ -7,6 +7,14 @@
> >
> > #define UPROBE_TRAP_NR UINT_MAX
> >
> > +static __init int check_emit_break(void)
> > +{
> > + BUG_ON(UPROBE_SWBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP));
> > + BUG_ON(UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP));
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +arch_initcall(check_emit_break);
> > +
>
> I wouldn't even bother with this, but whatever.
Agreed, this looks a bit ugly. I did this only because I can not test
this (hopefully trivial) patch and the maintainers didn't reply.
If LoongArch boots at least once with this change, this run-time check
can be removed.
And just in case... I didn't dare to make a more "generic" change, but
perhaps KPROBE_BP_INSN and KPROBE_SSTEPBP_INSN should be redefined the
same way for micro-optimization. In this case __emit_break() should be
probably moved into arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h.
Oleg.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: uprobes: make UPROBE_SWBP_INSN/UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN constant
2024-06-27 17:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
@ 2024-06-28 4:30 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-06-29 12:48 ` Tiezhu Yang
1 sibling, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Masami Hiramatsu @ 2024-06-28 4:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko, Tiezhu Yang, Jiri Olsa, Steven Rostedt,
Masami Hiramatsu, Andrii Nakryiko, Nathan Chancellor,
linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, bpf, Huacai Chen, WANG Xuerui,
loongarch
On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:38:06 +0200
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 06/27, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> >
> > Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
>
> Thanks!
>
> > > --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c
> > > +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c
> > > @@ -7,6 +7,14 @@
> > >
> > > #define UPROBE_TRAP_NR UINT_MAX
> > >
> > > +static __init int check_emit_break(void)
> > > +{
> > > + BUG_ON(UPROBE_SWBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP));
> > > + BUG_ON(UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP));
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +arch_initcall(check_emit_break);
> > > +
> >
> > I wouldn't even bother with this, but whatever.
>
> Agreed, this looks a bit ugly. I did this only because I can not test
> this (hopefully trivial) patch and the maintainers didn't reply.
>
> If LoongArch boots at least once with this change, this run-time check
> can be removed.
>
> And just in case... I didn't dare to make a more "generic" change, but
> perhaps KPROBE_BP_INSN and KPROBE_SSTEPBP_INSN should be redefined the
> same way for micro-optimization. In this case __emit_break() should be
> probably moved into arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h.
That idea sounds good to me too. If it is good to loongarch maintainers,
(e.g. breakpoint instruction is stable), it is better to define in
asm/insn.h.
Thank you,
>
> Oleg.
>
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: uprobes: make UPROBE_SWBP_INSN/UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN constant
2024-06-27 17:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-28 4:30 ` Masami Hiramatsu
@ 2024-06-29 12:48 ` Tiezhu Yang
2024-06-29 13:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
1 sibling, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Tiezhu Yang @ 2024-06-29 12:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: oleg
Cc: andrii.nakryiko, andrii, bpf, chenhuacai, jolsa, kernel,
linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, loongarch, mhiramat, nathan,
rostedt, yangtiezhu
On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:38:06 +0200
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
...
> > > +arch_initcall(check_emit_break);
> > > +
> >
> > I wouldn't even bother with this, but whatever.
>
> Agreed, this looks a bit ugly. I did this only because I can not test
> this (hopefully trivial) patch and the maintainers didn't reply.
The LoongArch maintainer Huacai told me offline to reply this thread today.
> If LoongArch boots at least once with this change, this run-time check
> can be removed.
I will test it next Monday.
> And just in case... I didn't dare to make a more "generic" change, but
> perhaps KPROBE_BP_INSN and KPROBE_SSTEPBP_INSN should be redefined the
> same way for micro-optimization. In this case __emit_break() should be
> probably moved into arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h.
Yeah. I think so too.
Thanks,
Tiezhu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: uprobes: make UPROBE_SWBP_INSN/UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN constant
2024-06-29 12:48 ` Tiezhu Yang
@ 2024-06-29 13:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-29 13:48 ` Huacai Chen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2024-06-29 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tiezhu Yang
Cc: andrii.nakryiko, andrii, bpf, chenhuacai, jolsa, kernel,
linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, loongarch, mhiramat, nathan,
rostedt
On 06/29, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
>
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:38:06 +0200
> Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > > +arch_initcall(check_emit_break);
> > > > +
> > >
> > > I wouldn't even bother with this, but whatever.
> >
> > Agreed, this looks a bit ugly. I did this only because I can not test
> > this (hopefully trivial) patch and the maintainers didn't reply.
>
> The LoongArch maintainer Huacai told me offline to reply this thread today.
>
> > If LoongArch boots at least once with this change, this run-time check
> > can be removed.
>
> I will test it next Monday.
Thanks!
> > And just in case... I didn't dare to make a more "generic" change, but
> > perhaps KPROBE_BP_INSN and KPROBE_SSTEPBP_INSN should be redefined the
> > same way for micro-optimization. In this case __emit_break() should be
> > probably moved into arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h.
>
> Yeah. I think so too.
OK... should I send v2? Or another change which does this on top of this
patch? Or will you do it yourself?
>
> Thanks,
> Tiezhu
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: uprobes: make UPROBE_SWBP_INSN/UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN constant
2024-06-29 13:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
@ 2024-06-29 13:48 ` Huacai Chen
2024-06-29 15:03 ` [PATCH] LoongArch: make the users of larch_insn_gen_break() constant Oleg Nesterov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Huacai Chen @ 2024-06-29 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Tiezhu Yang, andrii.nakryiko, andrii, bpf, jolsa, kernel,
linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, loongarch, mhiramat, nathan,
rostedt
On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 9:40 PM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 06/29, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:38:06 +0200
> > Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > > > +arch_initcall(check_emit_break);
> > > > > +
> > > >
> > > > I wouldn't even bother with this, but whatever.
> > >
> > > Agreed, this looks a bit ugly. I did this only because I can not test
> > > this (hopefully trivial) patch and the maintainers didn't reply.
> >
> > The LoongArch maintainer Huacai told me offline to reply this thread today.
> >
> > > If LoongArch boots at least once with this change, this run-time check
> > > can be removed.
> >
> > I will test it next Monday.
>
> Thanks!
>
> > > And just in case... I didn't dare to make a more "generic" change, but
> > > perhaps KPROBE_BP_INSN and KPROBE_SSTEPBP_INSN should be redefined the
> > > same way for micro-optimization. In this case __emit_break() should be
> > > probably moved into arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h.
> >
> > Yeah. I think so too.
>
> OK... should I send v2? Or another change which does this on top of this
> patch? Or will you do it yourself?
I prefer V2.
Huacai
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tiezhu
> >
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] LoongArch: make the users of larch_insn_gen_break() constant
2024-06-29 13:48 ` Huacai Chen
@ 2024-06-29 15:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-30 1:43 ` Huacai Chen
2024-07-01 6:22 ` Tiezhu Yang
0 siblings, 2 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2024-06-29 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Huacai Chen
Cc: Tiezhu Yang, andrii.nakryiko, andrii, bpf, jolsa, kernel,
linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, loongarch, mhiramat, nathan,
rostedt
LoongArch defines UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as a function call and this breaks
arch_uprobe_trampoline() which uses it to initialize a static variable.
Add the new "__builtin_constant_p" helper, __emit_break(), and redefine
the current users of larch_insn_gen_break() to use it.
The patch adds check_emit_break() into kprobes.c and uprobes.c to test
this change. They can be removed if LoongArch boots at least once, but
otoh these 2 __init functions will be discarded by free_initmem().
Fixes: ff474a78cef5 ("uprobe: Add uretprobe syscall to speed up return probe")
Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240614174822.GA1185149@thelio-3990X/
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h | 3 +++
arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h | 4 ++--
arch/loongarch/kernel/kprobes.c | 12 ++++++++++--
arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c | 8 ++++++++
4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h
index c3993fd88aba..944482063f14 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h
+++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h
@@ -532,6 +532,9 @@ static inline void emit_##NAME(union loongarch_instruction *insn, \
DEF_EMIT_REG0I15_FORMAT(break, break_op)
+/* like emit_break(imm) but returns a constant expression */
+#define __emit_break(imm) ((u32)((imm) | (break_op << 15)))
+
#define DEF_EMIT_REG0I26_FORMAT(NAME, OP) \
static inline void emit_##NAME(union loongarch_instruction *insn, \
int offset) \
diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h
index c8f59983f702..99a0d198927f 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h
+++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h
@@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ typedef u32 uprobe_opcode_t;
#define MAX_UINSN_BYTES 8
#define UPROBE_XOL_SLOT_BYTES MAX_UINSN_BYTES
-#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP)
+#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN __emit_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP)
#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE LOONGARCH_INSN_SIZE
-#define UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP)
+#define UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN __emit_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP)
struct arch_uprobe {
unsigned long resume_era;
diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/kprobes.c
index 17b040bd6067..78cfaac52748 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -4,8 +4,16 @@
#include <linux/preempt.h>
#include <asm/break.h>
-#define KPROBE_BP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_KPROBE_BP)
-#define KPROBE_SSTEPBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_KPROBE_SSTEPBP)
+#define KPROBE_BP_INSN __emit_break(BRK_KPROBE_BP)
+#define KPROBE_SSTEPBP_INSN __emit_break(BRK_KPROBE_SSTEPBP)
+
+static __init int check_emit_break(void)
+{
+ BUG_ON(KPROBE_BP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_KPROBE_BP));
+ BUG_ON(KPROBE_SSTEPBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_KPROBE_SSTEPBP));
+ return 0;
+}
+arch_initcall(check_emit_break);
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe *, current_kprobe);
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe_ctlblk, kprobe_ctlblk);
diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c
index 87abc7137b73..90462d94c28f 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c
+++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c
@@ -7,6 +7,14 @@
#define UPROBE_TRAP_NR UINT_MAX
+static __init int check_emit_break(void)
+{
+ BUG_ON(UPROBE_SWBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP));
+ BUG_ON(UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP));
+ return 0;
+}
+arch_initcall(check_emit_break);
+
int arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe,
struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
{
--
2.25.1.362.g51ebf55
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: make the users of larch_insn_gen_break() constant
2024-06-29 15:03 ` [PATCH] LoongArch: make the users of larch_insn_gen_break() constant Oleg Nesterov
@ 2024-06-30 1:43 ` Huacai Chen
2024-06-30 6:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-07-01 6:22 ` Tiezhu Yang
1 sibling, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Huacai Chen @ 2024-06-30 1:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Tiezhu Yang, andrii.nakryiko, andrii, bpf, jolsa, kernel,
linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, loongarch, mhiramat, nathan,
rostedt
Hi, Oleg,
On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 11:05 PM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> LoongArch defines UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as a function call and this breaks
> arch_uprobe_trampoline() which uses it to initialize a static variable.
>
> Add the new "__builtin_constant_p" helper, __emit_break(), and redefine
> the current users of larch_insn_gen_break() to use it.
>
> The patch adds check_emit_break() into kprobes.c and uprobes.c to test
> this change. They can be removed if LoongArch boots at least once, but
> otoh these 2 __init functions will be discarded by free_initmem().
>
> Fixes: ff474a78cef5 ("uprobe: Add uretprobe syscall to speed up return probe")
> Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240614174822.GA1185149@thelio-3990X/
> Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h | 3 +++
> arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h | 4 ++--
> arch/loongarch/kernel/kprobes.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c | 8 ++++++++
> 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h
> index c3993fd88aba..944482063f14 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h
> @@ -532,6 +532,9 @@ static inline void emit_##NAME(union loongarch_instruction *insn, \
>
> DEF_EMIT_REG0I15_FORMAT(break, break_op)
>
> +/* like emit_break(imm) but returns a constant expression */
> +#define __emit_break(imm) ((u32)((imm) | (break_op << 15)))
> +
> #define DEF_EMIT_REG0I26_FORMAT(NAME, OP) \
> static inline void emit_##NAME(union loongarch_instruction *insn, \
> int offset) \
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h
> index c8f59983f702..99a0d198927f 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h
> @@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ typedef u32 uprobe_opcode_t;
> #define MAX_UINSN_BYTES 8
> #define UPROBE_XOL_SLOT_BYTES MAX_UINSN_BYTES
>
> -#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP)
> +#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN __emit_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP)
> #define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE LOONGARCH_INSN_SIZE
>
> -#define UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP)
> +#define UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN __emit_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP)
>
> struct arch_uprobe {
> unsigned long resume_era;
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/kprobes.c
> index 17b040bd6067..78cfaac52748 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -4,8 +4,16 @@
> #include <linux/preempt.h>
> #include <asm/break.h>
>
> -#define KPROBE_BP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_KPROBE_BP)
> -#define KPROBE_SSTEPBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_KPROBE_SSTEPBP)
> +#define KPROBE_BP_INSN __emit_break(BRK_KPROBE_BP)
> +#define KPROBE_SSTEPBP_INSN __emit_break(BRK_KPROBE_SSTEPBP)
> +
> +static __init int check_emit_break(void)
> +{
> + BUG_ON(KPROBE_BP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_KPROBE_BP));
> + BUG_ON(KPROBE_SSTEPBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_KPROBE_SSTEPBP));
> + return 0;
> +}
> +arch_initcall(check_emit_break);
>
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe *, current_kprobe);
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe_ctlblk, kprobe_ctlblk);
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c
> index 87abc7137b73..90462d94c28f 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,14 @@
>
> #define UPROBE_TRAP_NR UINT_MAX
>
> +static __init int check_emit_break(void)
> +{
> + BUG_ON(UPROBE_SWBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP));
> + BUG_ON(UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP));
> + return 0;
> +}
> +arch_initcall(check_emit_break);
Do you mind if I remove the runtime checking after Tiezhu tests the correctness?
Huacai
> +
> int arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe,
> struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
> {
> --
> 2.25.1.362.g51ebf55
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: make the users of larch_insn_gen_break() constant
2024-06-30 1:43 ` Huacai Chen
@ 2024-06-30 6:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2024-06-30 6:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Huacai Chen
Cc: Tiezhu Yang, andrii.nakryiko, andrii, bpf, jolsa, kernel,
linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, loongarch, mhiramat, nathan,
rostedt
On 06/30, Huacai Chen wrote:
>
> > +static __init int check_emit_break(void)
> > +{
> > + BUG_ON(UPROBE_SWBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP));
> > + BUG_ON(UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP));
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +arch_initcall(check_emit_break);
> Do you mind if I remove the runtime checking after Tiezhu tests the correctness?
Sure, please remove, thanks.
Oleg.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: make the users of larch_insn_gen_break() constant
2024-06-29 15:03 ` [PATCH] LoongArch: make the users of larch_insn_gen_break() constant Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-30 1:43 ` Huacai Chen
@ 2024-07-01 6:22 ` Tiezhu Yang
2024-07-01 15:01 ` Huacai Chen
1 sibling, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Tiezhu Yang @ 2024-07-01 6:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleg Nesterov, Huacai Chen
Cc: andrii.nakryiko, andrii, bpf, jolsa, kernel, linux-kernel,
linux-trace-kernel, loongarch, mhiramat, nathan, rostedt
On 06/29/2024 11:03 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> LoongArch defines UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as a function call and this breaks
> arch_uprobe_trampoline() which uses it to initialize a static variable.
>
> Add the new "__builtin_constant_p" helper, __emit_break(), and redefine
> the current users of larch_insn_gen_break() to use it.
>
> The patch adds check_emit_break() into kprobes.c and uprobes.c to test
> this change. They can be removed if LoongArch boots at least once, but
> otoh these 2 __init functions will be discarded by free_initmem().
>
> Fixes: ff474a78cef5 ("uprobe: Add uretprobe syscall to speed up return probe")
> Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240614174822.GA1185149@thelio-3990X/
> Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Tested on LoongArch machine with Loongson-3A5000 and Loongson-3A6000
CPU, based on 6.10-rc3,
KPROBE_BP_INSN == larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_KPROBE_BP)
KPROBE_SSTEPBP_INSN == larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_KPROBE_SSTEPBP)
UPROBE_SWBP_INSN == larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP)
UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN == larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP)
The two functions check_emit_break() can be removed in
arch/loongarch/kernel/kprobes.c and arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c
Tested-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Thanks,
Tiezhu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: make the users of larch_insn_gen_break() constant
2024-07-01 6:22 ` Tiezhu Yang
@ 2024-07-01 15:01 ` Huacai Chen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Huacai Chen @ 2024-07-01 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tiezhu Yang
Cc: Oleg Nesterov, andrii.nakryiko, andrii, bpf, jolsa, kernel,
linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, loongarch, mhiramat, nathan,
rostedt
On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 2:22 PM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> wrote:
>
> On 06/29/2024 11:03 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > LoongArch defines UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as a function call and this breaks
> > arch_uprobe_trampoline() which uses it to initialize a static variable.
> >
> > Add the new "__builtin_constant_p" helper, __emit_break(), and redefine
> > the current users of larch_insn_gen_break() to use it.
> >
> > The patch adds check_emit_break() into kprobes.c and uprobes.c to test
> > this change. They can be removed if LoongArch boots at least once, but
> > otoh these 2 __init functions will be discarded by free_initmem().
> >
> > Fixes: ff474a78cef5 ("uprobe: Add uretprobe syscall to speed up return probe")
> > Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240614174822.GA1185149@thelio-3990X/
> > Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
>
> Tested on LoongArch machine with Loongson-3A5000 and Loongson-3A6000
> CPU, based on 6.10-rc3,
>
> KPROBE_BP_INSN == larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_KPROBE_BP)
> KPROBE_SSTEPBP_INSN == larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_KPROBE_SSTEPBP)
> UPROBE_SWBP_INSN == larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP)
> UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN == larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP)
>
> The two functions check_emit_break() can be removed in
> arch/loongarch/kernel/kprobes.c and arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c
>
> Tested-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Queued, thanks.
Huacai
>
> Thanks,
> Tiezhu
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-07-01 15:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-06-18 19:43 [PATCH] uprobe: Do not use UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as static initializer Jiri Olsa
2024-06-20 19:00 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-20 19:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-20 21:30 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-21 12:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-21 13:17 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-06-27 13:44 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-06-27 14:20 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-06-27 15:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-27 16:02 ` [PATCH] LoongArch: uprobes: make UPROBE_SWBP_INSN/UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN constant Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-27 16:51 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-27 17:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-28 4:30 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-06-29 12:48 ` Tiezhu Yang
2024-06-29 13:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-29 13:48 ` Huacai Chen
2024-06-29 15:03 ` [PATCH] LoongArch: make the users of larch_insn_gen_break() constant Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-30 1:43 ` Huacai Chen
2024-06-30 6:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-07-01 6:22 ` Tiezhu Yang
2024-07-01 15:01 ` Huacai Chen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).