* [PATCH] uprobe: Do not use UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as static initializer
@ 2024-06-18 19:43 Jiri Olsa
2024-06-20 19:00 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-27 16:02 ` [PATCH] LoongArch: uprobes: make UPROBE_SWBP_INSN/UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN constant Oleg Nesterov
0 siblings, 2 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2024-06-18 19:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu, Andrii Nakryiko
Cc: Oleg Nesterov, Nathan Chancellor, linux-kernel,
linux-trace-kernel, bpf
Nathan reported compilation fail for loongarch arch:
kernel/events/uprobes.c: In function 'arch_uprobe_trampoline':
arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h:12:33: error: initializer element is not constant
12 | #define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/events/uprobes.c:1479:39: note: in expansion of macro 'UPROBE_SWBP_INSN'
1479 | static uprobe_opcode_t insn = UPROBE_SWBP_INSN;
Loongarch defines UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as function call, so we can't
use it to initialize static variable.
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Fixes: ff474a78cef5 ("uprobe: Add uretprobe syscall to speed up return probe")
Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 2816e65729ac..6986bd993702 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -1476,8 +1476,9 @@ static int xol_add_vma(struct mm_struct *mm, struct xol_area *area)
void * __weak arch_uprobe_trampoline(unsigned long *psize)
{
- static uprobe_opcode_t insn = UPROBE_SWBP_INSN;
+ static uprobe_opcode_t insn;
+ insn = insn ?: UPROBE_SWBP_INSN;
*psize = UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE;
return &insn;
}
--
2.45.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] uprobe: Do not use UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as static initializer 2024-06-18 19:43 [PATCH] uprobe: Do not use UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as static initializer Jiri Olsa @ 2024-06-20 19:00 ` Andrii Nakryiko 2024-06-20 19:38 ` Oleg Nesterov 2024-06-27 16:02 ` [PATCH] LoongArch: uprobes: make UPROBE_SWBP_INSN/UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN constant Oleg Nesterov 1 sibling, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2024-06-20 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Olsa Cc: Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu, Andrii Nakryiko, Oleg Nesterov, Nathan Chancellor, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, bpf On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 12:43 PM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote: > > Nathan reported compilation fail for loongarch arch: > > kernel/events/uprobes.c: In function 'arch_uprobe_trampoline': > arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h:12:33: error: initializer element is not constant > 12 | #define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > kernel/events/uprobes.c:1479:39: note: in expansion of macro 'UPROBE_SWBP_INSN' > 1479 | static uprobe_opcode_t insn = UPROBE_SWBP_INSN; > > Loongarch defines UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as function call, so we can't > use it to initialize static variable. > > Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> > Fixes: ff474a78cef5 ("uprobe: Add uretprobe syscall to speed up return probe") > Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> > --- > kernel/events/uprobes.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > Can we instead ask loongarch folks to rewrite it to be a constant? Having this as a function call is both an inconvenience and potential performance problem (a minor one, but still). I would imagine it's not hard to hard-code an instruction as a constant here. > diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c > index 2816e65729ac..6986bd993702 100644 > --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c > +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c > @@ -1476,8 +1476,9 @@ static int xol_add_vma(struct mm_struct *mm, struct xol_area *area) > > void * __weak arch_uprobe_trampoline(unsigned long *psize) > { > - static uprobe_opcode_t insn = UPROBE_SWBP_INSN; > + static uprobe_opcode_t insn; > > + insn = insn ?: UPROBE_SWBP_INSN; > *psize = UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE; > return &insn; > } > -- > 2.45.1 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] uprobe: Do not use UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as static initializer 2024-06-20 19:00 ` Andrii Nakryiko @ 2024-06-20 19:38 ` Oleg Nesterov 2024-06-20 21:30 ` Andrii Nakryiko 0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2024-06-20 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrii Nakryiko Cc: Jiri Olsa, Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu, Andrii Nakryiko, Nathan Chancellor, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, bpf On 06/20, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > Can we instead ask loongarch folks to rewrite it to be a constant? > Having this as a function call is both an inconvenience and potential > performance problem (a minor one, but still). I would imagine it's not > hard to hard-code an instruction as a constant here. I was going to ask the same question when I saw the bug report ;) The same for other users of larch_insn_gen_break(). But I can't understand what does it do, it calls emit_break() and git grep -w emit_break finds nothing. Oleg. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] uprobe: Do not use UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as static initializer 2024-06-20 19:38 ` Oleg Nesterov @ 2024-06-20 21:30 ` Andrii Nakryiko 2024-06-21 12:01 ` Oleg Nesterov 0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2024-06-20 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Jiri Olsa, Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu, Andrii Nakryiko, Nathan Chancellor, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, bpf On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 12:40 PM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 06/20, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > > > Can we instead ask loongarch folks to rewrite it to be a constant? > > Having this as a function call is both an inconvenience and potential > > performance problem (a minor one, but still). I would imagine it's not > > hard to hard-code an instruction as a constant here. > > I was going to ask the same question when I saw the bug report ;) > The same for other users of larch_insn_gen_break(). > > But I can't understand what does it do, it calls emit_break() and > git grep -w emit_break finds nothing. > It's DEF_EMIT_REG0I15_FORMAT(break, break_op) in arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h A bunch of macro magic, but in the end it produces some constant value, of course. > Oleg. > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] uprobe: Do not use UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as static initializer 2024-06-20 21:30 ` Andrii Nakryiko @ 2024-06-21 12:01 ` Oleg Nesterov 2024-06-21 13:17 ` Jiri Olsa 0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2024-06-21 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrii Nakryiko Cc: Jiri Olsa, Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu, Andrii Nakryiko, Nathan Chancellor, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, bpf On 06/20, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 12:40 PM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > But I can't understand what does it do, it calls emit_break() and > > git grep -w emit_break finds nothing. > > > > It's DEF_EMIT_REG0I15_FORMAT(break, break_op) in > arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h > > A bunch of macro magic, but in the end it produces some constant > value, of course. I see, thanks! Then perhaps something like below? Oleg. --- x/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h +++ x/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ typedef u32 uprobe_opcode_t; #define MAX_UINSN_BYTES 8 #define UPROBE_XOL_SLOT_BYTES MAX_UINSN_BYTES -#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP) +#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN (uprobe_opcode_t)(BRK_UPROBE_BP | (break_op << 15)) #define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE LOONGARCH_INSN_SIZE #define UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP) --- x/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c +++ x/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c @@ -7,6 +7,13 @@ #define UPROBE_TRAP_NR UINT_MAX +static __init int __ck_insn(void) +{ + BUG_ON(UPROBE_SWBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP)); + return 0; +} +late_initcall(__ck_insn); + int arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr) { ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] uprobe: Do not use UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as static initializer 2024-06-21 12:01 ` Oleg Nesterov @ 2024-06-21 13:17 ` Jiri Olsa 2024-06-27 13:44 ` Jiri Olsa 0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread From: Jiri Olsa @ 2024-06-21 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Oleg Nesterov, Huacai Chen, WANG Xuerui Cc: Andrii Nakryiko, Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu, Andrii Nakryiko, Nathan Chancellor, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, bpf, loongarch On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 02:01:50PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 06/20, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 12:40 PM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > But I can't understand what does it do, it calls emit_break() and > > > git grep -w emit_break finds nothing. > > > > > > > It's DEF_EMIT_REG0I15_FORMAT(break, break_op) in > > arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h > > > > A bunch of macro magic, but in the end it produces some constant > > value, of course. > > I see, thanks! > > Then perhaps something like below? lgtm, added loong arch list/folks for context: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240614174822.GA1185149@thelio-3990X/ thanks, jirka > > Oleg. > > > --- x/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h > +++ x/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ typedef u32 uprobe_opcode_t; > #define MAX_UINSN_BYTES 8 > #define UPROBE_XOL_SLOT_BYTES MAX_UINSN_BYTES > > -#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP) > +#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN (uprobe_opcode_t)(BRK_UPROBE_BP | (break_op << 15)) > #define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE LOONGARCH_INSN_SIZE > > #define UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP) > --- x/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c > +++ x/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c > @@ -7,6 +7,13 @@ > > #define UPROBE_TRAP_NR UINT_MAX > > +static __init int __ck_insn(void) > +{ > + BUG_ON(UPROBE_SWBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP)); > + return 0; > +} > +late_initcall(__ck_insn); > + > int arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, > struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr) > { > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] uprobe: Do not use UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as static initializer 2024-06-21 13:17 ` Jiri Olsa @ 2024-06-27 13:44 ` Jiri Olsa 2024-06-27 14:20 ` Masami Hiramatsu 0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread From: Jiri Olsa @ 2024-06-27 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Olsa Cc: Oleg Nesterov, Huacai Chen, WANG Xuerui, Andrii Nakryiko, Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu, Andrii Nakryiko, Nathan Chancellor, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, bpf, loongarch On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 03:17:58PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 02:01:50PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > On 06/20, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 12:40 PM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > But I can't understand what does it do, it calls emit_break() and > > > > git grep -w emit_break finds nothing. > > > > > > > > > > It's DEF_EMIT_REG0I15_FORMAT(break, break_op) in > > > arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h > > > > > > A bunch of macro magic, but in the end it produces some constant > > > value, of course. > > > > I see, thanks! > > > > Then perhaps something like below? > > lgtm, added loong arch list/folks ping Oleg, do you want to send formal patch? thanks, jirka > > for context: > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240614174822.GA1185149@thelio-3990X/ > > thanks, > jirka > > > > > Oleg. > > > > > > --- x/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h > > +++ x/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h > > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ typedef u32 uprobe_opcode_t; > > #define MAX_UINSN_BYTES 8 > > #define UPROBE_XOL_SLOT_BYTES MAX_UINSN_BYTES > > > > -#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP) > > +#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN (uprobe_opcode_t)(BRK_UPROBE_BP | (break_op << 15)) > > #define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE LOONGARCH_INSN_SIZE > > > > #define UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP) > > --- x/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c > > +++ x/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c > > @@ -7,6 +7,13 @@ > > > > #define UPROBE_TRAP_NR UINT_MAX > > > > +static __init int __ck_insn(void) > > +{ > > + BUG_ON(UPROBE_SWBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP)); > > + return 0; > > +} > > +late_initcall(__ck_insn); > > + > > int arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, > > struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr) > > { > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] uprobe: Do not use UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as static initializer 2024-06-27 13:44 ` Jiri Olsa @ 2024-06-27 14:20 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2024-06-27 15:29 ` Oleg Nesterov 0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread From: Masami Hiramatsu @ 2024-06-27 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Olsa Cc: Oleg Nesterov, Huacai Chen, WANG Xuerui, Andrii Nakryiko, Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu, Andrii Nakryiko, Nathan Chancellor, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, bpf, loongarch On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 15:44:16 +0200 Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 03:17:58PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 02:01:50PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > On 06/20, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 12:40 PM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > But I can't understand what does it do, it calls emit_break() and > > > > > git grep -w emit_break finds nothing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's DEF_EMIT_REG0I15_FORMAT(break, break_op) in > > > > arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h > > > > > > > > A bunch of macro magic, but in the end it produces some constant > > > > value, of course. > > > > > > I see, thanks! > > > > > > Then perhaps something like below? > > > > lgtm, added loong arch list/folks > > ping > > Oleg, do you want to send formal patch? > > thanks, > jirka Yes, can you send v2 patch? Thank you, > > > > > for context: > > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240614174822.GA1185149@thelio-3990X/ > > > > thanks, > > jirka > > > > > > > > Oleg. > > > > > > > > > --- x/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h > > > +++ x/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h > > > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ typedef u32 uprobe_opcode_t; > > > #define MAX_UINSN_BYTES 8 > > > #define UPROBE_XOL_SLOT_BYTES MAX_UINSN_BYTES > > > > > > -#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP) > > > +#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN (uprobe_opcode_t)(BRK_UPROBE_BP | (break_op << 15)) > > > #define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE LOONGARCH_INSN_SIZE > > > > > > #define UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP) > > > --- x/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c > > > +++ x/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c > > > @@ -7,6 +7,13 @@ > > > > > > #define UPROBE_TRAP_NR UINT_MAX > > > > > > +static __init int __ck_insn(void) > > > +{ > > > + BUG_ON(UPROBE_SWBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP)); > > > + return 0; > > > +} > > > +late_initcall(__ck_insn); > > > + > > > int arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, > > > struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr) > > > { > > > -- Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] uprobe: Do not use UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as static initializer 2024-06-27 14:20 ` Masami Hiramatsu @ 2024-06-27 15:29 ` Oleg Nesterov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2024-06-27 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Jiri Olsa, Huacai Chen, WANG Xuerui, Andrii Nakryiko, Steven Rostedt, Andrii Nakryiko, Nathan Chancellor, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, bpf, loongarch On 06/27, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 15:44:16 +0200 > Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Oleg, do you want to send formal patch? > > > > thanks, > > jirka > > Yes, can you send v2 patch? I was waiting for the comments from loongarch maintainers... OK, will do today, but the patch won't be even compile tested. Oleg. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] LoongArch: uprobes: make UPROBE_SWBP_INSN/UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN constant 2024-06-18 19:43 [PATCH] uprobe: Do not use UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as static initializer Jiri Olsa 2024-06-20 19:00 ` Andrii Nakryiko @ 2024-06-27 16:02 ` Oleg Nesterov 2024-06-27 16:51 ` Andrii Nakryiko 1 sibling, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2024-06-27 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tiezhu Yang, Jiri Olsa, Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Andrii Nakryiko, Nathan Chancellor, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, bpf, Huacai Chen, WANG Xuerui, loongarch LoongArch defines UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as a function call and this breaks arch_uprobe_trampoline() which uses it to initialize a static variable. Fixes: ff474a78cef5 ("uprobe: Add uretprobe syscall to speed up return probe") Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240614174822.GA1185149@thelio-3990X/ Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> --- arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h | 6 ++++-- arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c | 8 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h index c8f59983f702..18221eb9a8b0 100644 --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h @@ -6,13 +6,15 @@ typedef u32 uprobe_opcode_t; +#define __emit_break(imm) (uprobe_opcode_t)((imm) | (break_op << 15)) + #define MAX_UINSN_BYTES 8 #define UPROBE_XOL_SLOT_BYTES MAX_UINSN_BYTES -#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP) +#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN __emit_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP) #define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE LOONGARCH_INSN_SIZE -#define UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP) +#define UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN __emit_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP) struct arch_uprobe { unsigned long resume_era; diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c index 87abc7137b73..90462d94c28f 100644 --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c @@ -7,6 +7,14 @@ #define UPROBE_TRAP_NR UINT_MAX +static __init int check_emit_break(void) +{ + BUG_ON(UPROBE_SWBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP)); + BUG_ON(UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP)); + return 0; +} +arch_initcall(check_emit_break); + int arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr) { -- 2.25.1.362.g51ebf55 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: uprobes: make UPROBE_SWBP_INSN/UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN constant 2024-06-27 16:02 ` [PATCH] LoongArch: uprobes: make UPROBE_SWBP_INSN/UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN constant Oleg Nesterov @ 2024-06-27 16:51 ` Andrii Nakryiko 2024-06-27 17:38 ` Oleg Nesterov 0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2024-06-27 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Tiezhu Yang, Jiri Olsa, Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu, Andrii Nakryiko, Nathan Chancellor, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, bpf, Huacai Chen, WANG Xuerui, loongarch On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 9:04 AM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote: > > LoongArch defines UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as a function call and this breaks > arch_uprobe_trampoline() which uses it to initialize a static variable. > > Fixes: ff474a78cef5 ("uprobe: Add uretprobe syscall to speed up return probe") > Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240614174822.GA1185149@thelio-3990X/ > Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> > --- > arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h | 6 ++++-- > arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c | 8 ++++++++ > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > LGTM. Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> > diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h > index c8f59983f702..18221eb9a8b0 100644 > --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h > +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h > @@ -6,13 +6,15 @@ > > typedef u32 uprobe_opcode_t; > > +#define __emit_break(imm) (uprobe_opcode_t)((imm) | (break_op << 15)) > + > #define MAX_UINSN_BYTES 8 > #define UPROBE_XOL_SLOT_BYTES MAX_UINSN_BYTES > > -#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP) > +#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN __emit_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP) > #define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE LOONGARCH_INSN_SIZE > > -#define UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP) > +#define UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN __emit_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP) > this looks correct (but based on pure code inspection) > struct arch_uprobe { > unsigned long resume_era; > diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c > index 87abc7137b73..90462d94c28f 100644 > --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c > +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c > @@ -7,6 +7,14 @@ > > #define UPROBE_TRAP_NR UINT_MAX > > +static __init int check_emit_break(void) > +{ > + BUG_ON(UPROBE_SWBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP)); > + BUG_ON(UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP)); > + return 0; > +} > +arch_initcall(check_emit_break); > + I wouldn't even bother with this, but whatever. > int arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, > struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr) > { > -- > 2.25.1.362.g51ebf55 > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: uprobes: make UPROBE_SWBP_INSN/UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN constant 2024-06-27 16:51 ` Andrii Nakryiko @ 2024-06-27 17:38 ` Oleg Nesterov 2024-06-28 4:30 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2024-06-29 12:48 ` Tiezhu Yang 0 siblings, 2 replies; 21+ messages in thread From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2024-06-27 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrii Nakryiko Cc: Tiezhu Yang, Jiri Olsa, Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu, Andrii Nakryiko, Nathan Chancellor, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, bpf, Huacai Chen, WANG Xuerui, loongarch On 06/27, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Thanks! > > --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c > > +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c > > @@ -7,6 +7,14 @@ > > > > #define UPROBE_TRAP_NR UINT_MAX > > > > +static __init int check_emit_break(void) > > +{ > > + BUG_ON(UPROBE_SWBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP)); > > + BUG_ON(UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP)); > > + return 0; > > +} > > +arch_initcall(check_emit_break); > > + > > I wouldn't even bother with this, but whatever. Agreed, this looks a bit ugly. I did this only because I can not test this (hopefully trivial) patch and the maintainers didn't reply. If LoongArch boots at least once with this change, this run-time check can be removed. And just in case... I didn't dare to make a more "generic" change, but perhaps KPROBE_BP_INSN and KPROBE_SSTEPBP_INSN should be redefined the same way for micro-optimization. In this case __emit_break() should be probably moved into arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h. Oleg. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: uprobes: make UPROBE_SWBP_INSN/UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN constant 2024-06-27 17:38 ` Oleg Nesterov @ 2024-06-28 4:30 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2024-06-29 12:48 ` Tiezhu Yang 1 sibling, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread From: Masami Hiramatsu @ 2024-06-28 4:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Andrii Nakryiko, Tiezhu Yang, Jiri Olsa, Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu, Andrii Nakryiko, Nathan Chancellor, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, bpf, Huacai Chen, WANG Xuerui, loongarch On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:38:06 +0200 Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote: > On 06/27, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > > > Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> > > Thanks! > > > > --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c > > > +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c > > > @@ -7,6 +7,14 @@ > > > > > > #define UPROBE_TRAP_NR UINT_MAX > > > > > > +static __init int check_emit_break(void) > > > +{ > > > + BUG_ON(UPROBE_SWBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP)); > > > + BUG_ON(UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP)); > > > + return 0; > > > +} > > > +arch_initcall(check_emit_break); > > > + > > > > I wouldn't even bother with this, but whatever. > > Agreed, this looks a bit ugly. I did this only because I can not test > this (hopefully trivial) patch and the maintainers didn't reply. > > If LoongArch boots at least once with this change, this run-time check > can be removed. > > And just in case... I didn't dare to make a more "generic" change, but > perhaps KPROBE_BP_INSN and KPROBE_SSTEPBP_INSN should be redefined the > same way for micro-optimization. In this case __emit_break() should be > probably moved into arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h. That idea sounds good to me too. If it is good to loongarch maintainers, (e.g. breakpoint instruction is stable), it is better to define in asm/insn.h. Thank you, > > Oleg. > > -- Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: uprobes: make UPROBE_SWBP_INSN/UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN constant 2024-06-27 17:38 ` Oleg Nesterov 2024-06-28 4:30 ` Masami Hiramatsu @ 2024-06-29 12:48 ` Tiezhu Yang 2024-06-29 13:38 ` Oleg Nesterov 1 sibling, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread From: Tiezhu Yang @ 2024-06-29 12:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: oleg Cc: andrii.nakryiko, andrii, bpf, chenhuacai, jolsa, kernel, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, loongarch, mhiramat, nathan, rostedt, yangtiezhu On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:38:06 +0200 Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote: ... > > > +arch_initcall(check_emit_break); > > > + > > > > I wouldn't even bother with this, but whatever. > > Agreed, this looks a bit ugly. I did this only because I can not test > this (hopefully trivial) patch and the maintainers didn't reply. The LoongArch maintainer Huacai told me offline to reply this thread today. > If LoongArch boots at least once with this change, this run-time check > can be removed. I will test it next Monday. > And just in case... I didn't dare to make a more "generic" change, but > perhaps KPROBE_BP_INSN and KPROBE_SSTEPBP_INSN should be redefined the > same way for micro-optimization. In this case __emit_break() should be > probably moved into arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h. Yeah. I think so too. Thanks, Tiezhu ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: uprobes: make UPROBE_SWBP_INSN/UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN constant 2024-06-29 12:48 ` Tiezhu Yang @ 2024-06-29 13:38 ` Oleg Nesterov 2024-06-29 13:48 ` Huacai Chen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2024-06-29 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tiezhu Yang Cc: andrii.nakryiko, andrii, bpf, chenhuacai, jolsa, kernel, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, loongarch, mhiramat, nathan, rostedt On 06/29, Tiezhu Yang wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:38:06 +0200 > Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote: > > ... > > > > > +arch_initcall(check_emit_break); > > > > + > > > > > > I wouldn't even bother with this, but whatever. > > > > Agreed, this looks a bit ugly. I did this only because I can not test > > this (hopefully trivial) patch and the maintainers didn't reply. > > The LoongArch maintainer Huacai told me offline to reply this thread today. > > > If LoongArch boots at least once with this change, this run-time check > > can be removed. > > I will test it next Monday. Thanks! > > And just in case... I didn't dare to make a more "generic" change, but > > perhaps KPROBE_BP_INSN and KPROBE_SSTEPBP_INSN should be redefined the > > same way for micro-optimization. In this case __emit_break() should be > > probably moved into arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h. > > Yeah. I think so too. OK... should I send v2? Or another change which does this on top of this patch? Or will you do it yourself? > > Thanks, > Tiezhu > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: uprobes: make UPROBE_SWBP_INSN/UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN constant 2024-06-29 13:38 ` Oleg Nesterov @ 2024-06-29 13:48 ` Huacai Chen 2024-06-29 15:03 ` [PATCH] LoongArch: make the users of larch_insn_gen_break() constant Oleg Nesterov 0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread From: Huacai Chen @ 2024-06-29 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Tiezhu Yang, andrii.nakryiko, andrii, bpf, jolsa, kernel, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, loongarch, mhiramat, nathan, rostedt On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 9:40 PM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 06/29, Tiezhu Yang wrote: > > > > On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:38:06 +0200 > > Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > > > +arch_initcall(check_emit_break); > > > > > + > > > > > > > > I wouldn't even bother with this, but whatever. > > > > > > Agreed, this looks a bit ugly. I did this only because I can not test > > > this (hopefully trivial) patch and the maintainers didn't reply. > > > > The LoongArch maintainer Huacai told me offline to reply this thread today. > > > > > If LoongArch boots at least once with this change, this run-time check > > > can be removed. > > > > I will test it next Monday. > > Thanks! > > > > And just in case... I didn't dare to make a more "generic" change, but > > > perhaps KPROBE_BP_INSN and KPROBE_SSTEPBP_INSN should be redefined the > > > same way for micro-optimization. In this case __emit_break() should be > > > probably moved into arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h. > > > > Yeah. I think so too. > > OK... should I send v2? Or another change which does this on top of this > patch? Or will you do it yourself? I prefer V2. Huacai > > > > > Thanks, > > Tiezhu > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] LoongArch: make the users of larch_insn_gen_break() constant 2024-06-29 13:48 ` Huacai Chen @ 2024-06-29 15:03 ` Oleg Nesterov 2024-06-30 1:43 ` Huacai Chen 2024-07-01 6:22 ` Tiezhu Yang 0 siblings, 2 replies; 21+ messages in thread From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2024-06-29 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Huacai Chen Cc: Tiezhu Yang, andrii.nakryiko, andrii, bpf, jolsa, kernel, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, loongarch, mhiramat, nathan, rostedt LoongArch defines UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as a function call and this breaks arch_uprobe_trampoline() which uses it to initialize a static variable. Add the new "__builtin_constant_p" helper, __emit_break(), and redefine the current users of larch_insn_gen_break() to use it. The patch adds check_emit_break() into kprobes.c and uprobes.c to test this change. They can be removed if LoongArch boots at least once, but otoh these 2 __init functions will be discarded by free_initmem(). Fixes: ff474a78cef5 ("uprobe: Add uretprobe syscall to speed up return probe") Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240614174822.GA1185149@thelio-3990X/ Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> --- arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h | 3 +++ arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h | 4 ++-- arch/loongarch/kernel/kprobes.c | 12 ++++++++++-- arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c | 8 ++++++++ 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h index c3993fd88aba..944482063f14 100644 --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h @@ -532,6 +532,9 @@ static inline void emit_##NAME(union loongarch_instruction *insn, \ DEF_EMIT_REG0I15_FORMAT(break, break_op) +/* like emit_break(imm) but returns a constant expression */ +#define __emit_break(imm) ((u32)((imm) | (break_op << 15))) + #define DEF_EMIT_REG0I26_FORMAT(NAME, OP) \ static inline void emit_##NAME(union loongarch_instruction *insn, \ int offset) \ diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h index c8f59983f702..99a0d198927f 100644 --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h @@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ typedef u32 uprobe_opcode_t; #define MAX_UINSN_BYTES 8 #define UPROBE_XOL_SLOT_BYTES MAX_UINSN_BYTES -#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP) +#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN __emit_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP) #define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE LOONGARCH_INSN_SIZE -#define UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP) +#define UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN __emit_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP) struct arch_uprobe { unsigned long resume_era; diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/kprobes.c index 17b040bd6067..78cfaac52748 100644 --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/kprobes.c +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/kprobes.c @@ -4,8 +4,16 @@ #include <linux/preempt.h> #include <asm/break.h> -#define KPROBE_BP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_KPROBE_BP) -#define KPROBE_SSTEPBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_KPROBE_SSTEPBP) +#define KPROBE_BP_INSN __emit_break(BRK_KPROBE_BP) +#define KPROBE_SSTEPBP_INSN __emit_break(BRK_KPROBE_SSTEPBP) + +static __init int check_emit_break(void) +{ + BUG_ON(KPROBE_BP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_KPROBE_BP)); + BUG_ON(KPROBE_SSTEPBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_KPROBE_SSTEPBP)); + return 0; +} +arch_initcall(check_emit_break); DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe *, current_kprobe); DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe_ctlblk, kprobe_ctlblk); diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c index 87abc7137b73..90462d94c28f 100644 --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c @@ -7,6 +7,14 @@ #define UPROBE_TRAP_NR UINT_MAX +static __init int check_emit_break(void) +{ + BUG_ON(UPROBE_SWBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP)); + BUG_ON(UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP)); + return 0; +} +arch_initcall(check_emit_break); + int arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr) { -- 2.25.1.362.g51ebf55 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: make the users of larch_insn_gen_break() constant 2024-06-29 15:03 ` [PATCH] LoongArch: make the users of larch_insn_gen_break() constant Oleg Nesterov @ 2024-06-30 1:43 ` Huacai Chen 2024-06-30 6:29 ` Oleg Nesterov 2024-07-01 6:22 ` Tiezhu Yang 1 sibling, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread From: Huacai Chen @ 2024-06-30 1:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Tiezhu Yang, andrii.nakryiko, andrii, bpf, jolsa, kernel, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, loongarch, mhiramat, nathan, rostedt Hi, Oleg, On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 11:05 PM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote: > > LoongArch defines UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as a function call and this breaks > arch_uprobe_trampoline() which uses it to initialize a static variable. > > Add the new "__builtin_constant_p" helper, __emit_break(), and redefine > the current users of larch_insn_gen_break() to use it. > > The patch adds check_emit_break() into kprobes.c and uprobes.c to test > this change. They can be removed if LoongArch boots at least once, but > otoh these 2 __init functions will be discarded by free_initmem(). > > Fixes: ff474a78cef5 ("uprobe: Add uretprobe syscall to speed up return probe") > Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240614174822.GA1185149@thelio-3990X/ > Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> > --- > arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h | 3 +++ > arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h | 4 ++-- > arch/loongarch/kernel/kprobes.c | 12 ++++++++++-- > arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c | 8 ++++++++ > 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h > index c3993fd88aba..944482063f14 100644 > --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h > +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h > @@ -532,6 +532,9 @@ static inline void emit_##NAME(union loongarch_instruction *insn, \ > > DEF_EMIT_REG0I15_FORMAT(break, break_op) > > +/* like emit_break(imm) but returns a constant expression */ > +#define __emit_break(imm) ((u32)((imm) | (break_op << 15))) > + > #define DEF_EMIT_REG0I26_FORMAT(NAME, OP) \ > static inline void emit_##NAME(union loongarch_instruction *insn, \ > int offset) \ > diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h > index c8f59983f702..99a0d198927f 100644 > --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h > +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uprobes.h > @@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ typedef u32 uprobe_opcode_t; > #define MAX_UINSN_BYTES 8 > #define UPROBE_XOL_SLOT_BYTES MAX_UINSN_BYTES > > -#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP) > +#define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN __emit_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP) > #define UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE LOONGARCH_INSN_SIZE > > -#define UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP) > +#define UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN __emit_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP) > > struct arch_uprobe { > unsigned long resume_era; > diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/kprobes.c > index 17b040bd6067..78cfaac52748 100644 > --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/kprobes.c > +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/kprobes.c > @@ -4,8 +4,16 @@ > #include <linux/preempt.h> > #include <asm/break.h> > > -#define KPROBE_BP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_KPROBE_BP) > -#define KPROBE_SSTEPBP_INSN larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_KPROBE_SSTEPBP) > +#define KPROBE_BP_INSN __emit_break(BRK_KPROBE_BP) > +#define KPROBE_SSTEPBP_INSN __emit_break(BRK_KPROBE_SSTEPBP) > + > +static __init int check_emit_break(void) > +{ > + BUG_ON(KPROBE_BP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_KPROBE_BP)); > + BUG_ON(KPROBE_SSTEPBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_KPROBE_SSTEPBP)); > + return 0; > +} > +arch_initcall(check_emit_break); > > DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe *, current_kprobe); > DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe_ctlblk, kprobe_ctlblk); > diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c > index 87abc7137b73..90462d94c28f 100644 > --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c > +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c > @@ -7,6 +7,14 @@ > > #define UPROBE_TRAP_NR UINT_MAX > > +static __init int check_emit_break(void) > +{ > + BUG_ON(UPROBE_SWBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP)); > + BUG_ON(UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP)); > + return 0; > +} > +arch_initcall(check_emit_break); Do you mind if I remove the runtime checking after Tiezhu tests the correctness? Huacai > + > int arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, > struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr) > { > -- > 2.25.1.362.g51ebf55 > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: make the users of larch_insn_gen_break() constant 2024-06-30 1:43 ` Huacai Chen @ 2024-06-30 6:29 ` Oleg Nesterov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2024-06-30 6:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Huacai Chen Cc: Tiezhu Yang, andrii.nakryiko, andrii, bpf, jolsa, kernel, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, loongarch, mhiramat, nathan, rostedt On 06/30, Huacai Chen wrote: > > > +static __init int check_emit_break(void) > > +{ > > + BUG_ON(UPROBE_SWBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP)); > > + BUG_ON(UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP)); > > + return 0; > > +} > > +arch_initcall(check_emit_break); > Do you mind if I remove the runtime checking after Tiezhu tests the correctness? Sure, please remove, thanks. Oleg. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: make the users of larch_insn_gen_break() constant 2024-06-29 15:03 ` [PATCH] LoongArch: make the users of larch_insn_gen_break() constant Oleg Nesterov 2024-06-30 1:43 ` Huacai Chen @ 2024-07-01 6:22 ` Tiezhu Yang 2024-07-01 15:01 ` Huacai Chen 1 sibling, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread From: Tiezhu Yang @ 2024-07-01 6:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Oleg Nesterov, Huacai Chen Cc: andrii.nakryiko, andrii, bpf, jolsa, kernel, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, loongarch, mhiramat, nathan, rostedt On 06/29/2024 11:03 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > LoongArch defines UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as a function call and this breaks > arch_uprobe_trampoline() which uses it to initialize a static variable. > > Add the new "__builtin_constant_p" helper, __emit_break(), and redefine > the current users of larch_insn_gen_break() to use it. > > The patch adds check_emit_break() into kprobes.c and uprobes.c to test > this change. They can be removed if LoongArch boots at least once, but > otoh these 2 __init functions will be discarded by free_initmem(). > > Fixes: ff474a78cef5 ("uprobe: Add uretprobe syscall to speed up return probe") > Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240614174822.GA1185149@thelio-3990X/ > Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Tested on LoongArch machine with Loongson-3A5000 and Loongson-3A6000 CPU, based on 6.10-rc3, KPROBE_BP_INSN == larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_KPROBE_BP) KPROBE_SSTEPBP_INSN == larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_KPROBE_SSTEPBP) UPROBE_SWBP_INSN == larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP) UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN == larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP) The two functions check_emit_break() can be removed in arch/loongarch/kernel/kprobes.c and arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c Tested-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Thanks, Tiezhu ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: make the users of larch_insn_gen_break() constant 2024-07-01 6:22 ` Tiezhu Yang @ 2024-07-01 15:01 ` Huacai Chen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread From: Huacai Chen @ 2024-07-01 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tiezhu Yang Cc: Oleg Nesterov, andrii.nakryiko, andrii, bpf, jolsa, kernel, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, loongarch, mhiramat, nathan, rostedt On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 2:22 PM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> wrote: > > On 06/29/2024 11:03 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > LoongArch defines UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as a function call and this breaks > > arch_uprobe_trampoline() which uses it to initialize a static variable. > > > > Add the new "__builtin_constant_p" helper, __emit_break(), and redefine > > the current users of larch_insn_gen_break() to use it. > > > > The patch adds check_emit_break() into kprobes.c and uprobes.c to test > > this change. They can be removed if LoongArch boots at least once, but > > otoh these 2 __init functions will be discarded by free_initmem(). > > > > Fixes: ff474a78cef5 ("uprobe: Add uretprobe syscall to speed up return probe") > > Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240614174822.GA1185149@thelio-3990X/ > > Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> > > Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> > > Tested on LoongArch machine with Loongson-3A5000 and Loongson-3A6000 > CPU, based on 6.10-rc3, > > KPROBE_BP_INSN == larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_KPROBE_BP) > KPROBE_SSTEPBP_INSN == larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_KPROBE_SSTEPBP) > UPROBE_SWBP_INSN == larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP) > UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN == larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP) > > The two functions check_emit_break() can be removed in > arch/loongarch/kernel/kprobes.c and arch/loongarch/kernel/uprobes.c > > Tested-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Queued, thanks. Huacai > > Thanks, > Tiezhu > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-07-01 15:01 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 21+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2024-06-18 19:43 [PATCH] uprobe: Do not use UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as static initializer Jiri Olsa 2024-06-20 19:00 ` Andrii Nakryiko 2024-06-20 19:38 ` Oleg Nesterov 2024-06-20 21:30 ` Andrii Nakryiko 2024-06-21 12:01 ` Oleg Nesterov 2024-06-21 13:17 ` Jiri Olsa 2024-06-27 13:44 ` Jiri Olsa 2024-06-27 14:20 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2024-06-27 15:29 ` Oleg Nesterov 2024-06-27 16:02 ` [PATCH] LoongArch: uprobes: make UPROBE_SWBP_INSN/UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN constant Oleg Nesterov 2024-06-27 16:51 ` Andrii Nakryiko 2024-06-27 17:38 ` Oleg Nesterov 2024-06-28 4:30 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2024-06-29 12:48 ` Tiezhu Yang 2024-06-29 13:38 ` Oleg Nesterov 2024-06-29 13:48 ` Huacai Chen 2024-06-29 15:03 ` [PATCH] LoongArch: make the users of larch_insn_gen_break() constant Oleg Nesterov 2024-06-30 1:43 ` Huacai Chen 2024-06-30 6:29 ` Oleg Nesterov 2024-07-01 6:22 ` Tiezhu Yang 2024-07-01 15:01 ` Huacai Chen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).