From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
To: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
mhiramat@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
jolsa@kernel.org, paulmck@kernel.org, clm@meta.com,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 01/12] uprobes: update outdated comment
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 17:21:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240625002144.3485799-2-andrii@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240625002144.3485799-1-andrii@kernel.org>
There is no task_struct passed into get_user_pages_remote() anymore,
drop the parts of comment mentioning NULL tsk, it's just confusing at
this point.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 2816e65729ac..197fbe4663b5 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -2030,10 +2030,8 @@ static int is_trap_at_addr(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr)
goto out;
/*
- * The NULL 'tsk' here ensures that any faults that occur here
- * will not be accounted to the task. 'mm' *is* current->mm,
- * but we treat this as a 'remote' access since it is
- * essentially a kernel access to the memory.
+ * 'mm' *is* current->mm, but we treat this as a 'remote' access since
+ * it is essentially a kernel access to the memory.
*/
result = get_user_pages_remote(mm, vaddr, 1, FOLL_FORCE, &page, NULL);
if (result < 0)
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-25 0:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-25 0:21 [PATCH 00/12] uprobes: add batched register/unregister APIs and per-CPU RW semaphore Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-25 0:21 ` Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2024-06-25 0:21 ` [PATCH 02/12] uprobes: grab write mmap lock in unapply_uprobe() Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-25 1:29 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-06-25 14:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-25 17:37 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-25 19:07 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-26 16:38 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-25 10:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-25 0:21 ` [PATCH 03/12] uprobes: simplify error handling for alloc_uprobe() Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-25 0:21 ` [PATCH 04/12] uprobes: revamp uprobe refcounting and lifetime management Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-25 14:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-25 17:30 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-26 6:02 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-26 16:39 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-27 2:29 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-06-27 16:43 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-01 21:59 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-25 0:21 ` [PATCH 05/12] uprobes: move offset and ref_ctr_offset into uprobe_consumer Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-27 3:06 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-06-25 0:21 ` [PATCH 06/12] uprobes: add batch uprobe register/unregister APIs Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-26 11:27 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-06-26 16:44 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-27 13:04 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-06-27 16:47 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-28 6:28 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-06-28 16:34 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-29 23:30 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-07-01 17:55 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-01 22:15 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-02 1:01 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-07-02 1:34 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-02 15:19 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-07-02 16:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-07-02 21:23 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-02 23:16 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-06-25 0:21 ` [PATCH 07/12] uprobes: inline alloc_uprobe() logic into __uprobe_register() Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-25 0:21 ` [PATCH 08/12] uprobes: split uprobe allocation and uprobes_tree insertion steps Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-25 0:21 ` [PATCH 09/12] uprobes: batch uprobes_treelock during registration Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-25 0:21 ` [PATCH 10/12] uprobes: improve lock batching for uprobe_unregister_batch Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-25 0:21 ` [PATCH 11/12] uprobes,bpf: switch to batch uprobe APIs for BPF multi-uprobes Andrii Nakryiko
2024-06-25 0:21 ` [PATCH 12/12] uprobes: switch uprobes_treelock to per-CPU RW semaphore Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240625002144.3485799-2-andrii@kernel.org \
--to=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=clm@meta.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).