From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, jolsa@kernel.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] uprobes: make uprobe_register() return struct uprobe *
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 09:44:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240731074424.GA12813@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240731143946.f5689502e03b9ff2e79be494@kernel.org>
On 07/31, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
> On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 15:45:35 +0200
> Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > This way uprobe_unregister() and uprobe_apply() can use "struct uprobe *"
> > rather than inode + offset. This simplifies the code and allows to avoid
> > the unnecessary find_uprobe() + put_uprobe() in these functions.
> >
> > TODO: uprobe_unregister() still needs get_uprobe/put_uprobe to ensure that
> > this uprobe can't be freed before up_write(&uprobe->register_rwsem).
>
> Is this TODO item, or just a note? At this moment, this is natural
> to use get_uprobe() to protect uprobe itself.
3/3 from the next series removes the extra get_uprobe() + put_uprobe().
Initially the change said something like
This patch adds the additional get_uprobe/put_uprobe into _register,
the next patch will remove this.
But then decided to split this "next" patch and send it in another series.
Thanks,
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-31 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-29 13:44 [PATCH v2 0/5] uprobes: misc cleanups/simplifications Oleg Nesterov
2024-07-29 13:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] uprobes: document the usage of mm->mmap_lock Oleg Nesterov
2024-07-29 13:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] uprobes: is_trap_at_addr: don't use get_user_pages_remote() Oleg Nesterov
2024-07-29 13:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] uprobes: simplify error handling for alloc_uprobe() Oleg Nesterov
2024-07-29 13:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] uprobes: kill uprobe_register_refctr() Oleg Nesterov
2024-07-31 5:37 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-07-31 7:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-07-31 8:10 ` [PATCH v3 " Oleg Nesterov
2024-07-29 13:45 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] uprobes: make uprobe_register() return struct uprobe * Oleg Nesterov
2024-07-31 5:39 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-07-31 7:44 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2024-07-31 16:18 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-31 16:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-07-31 17:01 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-31 17:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-07-31 17:12 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-31 17:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-07-31 17:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-08-01 13:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-08-01 11:32 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-08-01 12:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-08-01 12:15 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-08-01 12:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-08-01 13:07 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-07-30 7:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] uprobes: misc cleanups/simplifications Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240731074424.GA12813@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).