From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
To: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
oleg@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jolsa@kernel.org, paulmck@kernel.org,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6/8] perf/uprobe: split uprobe_unregister()
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 14:42:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240731214256.3588718-7-andrii@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240731214256.3588718-1-andrii@kernel.org>
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
With uprobe_unregister() having grown a synchronize_srcu(), it becomes
fairly slow to call. Esp. since both users of this API call it in a
loop.
Peel off the sync_srcu() and do it once, after the loop.
With recent uprobe_register()'s error handling reusing full
uprobe_unregister() call, we need to be careful about returning to the
caller before we have a guarantee that partially attached consumer won't
be called anymore. So add uprobe_unregister_sync() in the error handling
path. This is an unlikely slow path and this should be totally fine to
be slow in the case of an failed attach.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Co-developed-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/uprobes.h | 8 ++++++--
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 5 ++++-
kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 6 +++++-
.../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 3 ++-
5 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/uprobes.h b/include/linux/uprobes.h
index a1686c1ebcb6..8f1999eb9d9f 100644
--- a/include/linux/uprobes.h
+++ b/include/linux/uprobes.h
@@ -105,7 +105,8 @@ extern unsigned long uprobe_get_trap_addr(struct pt_regs *regs);
extern int uprobe_write_opcode(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr, uprobe_opcode_t);
extern struct uprobe *uprobe_register(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t ref_ctr_offset, struct uprobe_consumer *uc);
extern int uprobe_apply(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc, bool);
-extern void uprobe_unregister(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc);
+extern void uprobe_unregister_nosync(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc);
+extern void uprobe_unregister_sync(void);
extern int uprobe_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
extern void uprobe_munmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, unsigned long end);
extern void uprobe_start_dup_mmap(void);
@@ -154,7 +155,10 @@ uprobe_apply(struct uprobe* uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc, bool add)
return -ENOSYS;
}
static inline void
-uprobe_unregister(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
+uprobe_unregister_nosync(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
+{
+}
+static inline void uprobes_unregister_sync(void)
{
}
static inline int uprobe_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 3b42fd355256..b0488d356399 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -1089,11 +1089,11 @@ register_for_each_vma(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *new)
}
/**
- * uprobe_unregister - unregister an already registered probe.
+ * uprobe_unregister_nosync - unregister an already registered probe.
* @uprobe: uprobe to remove
* @uc: identify which probe if multiple probes are colocated.
*/
-void uprobe_unregister(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
+void uprobe_unregister_nosync(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
{
int err;
@@ -1109,10 +1109,14 @@ void uprobe_unregister(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
return;
put_uprobe(uprobe);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uprobe_unregister_nosync);
+void uprobe_unregister_sync(void)
+{
synchronize_srcu(&uprobes_srcu);
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uprobe_unregister);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uprobe_unregister_sync);
/**
* uprobe_register - register a probe
@@ -1170,7 +1174,13 @@ struct uprobe *uprobe_register(struct inode *inode,
up_write(&uprobe->register_rwsem);
if (ret) {
- uprobe_unregister(uprobe, uc);
+ uprobe_unregister_nosync(uprobe, uc);
+ /*
+ * Registration might have partially succeeded, so we can have
+ * this consumer being called right at this time. We need to
+ * sync here. It's ok, it's unlikely slow path.
+ */
+ uprobe_unregister_sync();
return ERR_PTR(ret);
}
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 73c570b5988b..6b632710c98e 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -3184,7 +3184,10 @@ static void bpf_uprobe_unregister(struct bpf_uprobe *uprobes, u32 cnt)
u32 i;
for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++)
- uprobe_unregister(uprobes[i].uprobe, &uprobes[i].consumer);
+ uprobe_unregister_nosync(uprobes[i].uprobe, &uprobes[i].consumer);
+
+ if (cnt)
+ uprobe_unregister_sync();
}
static void bpf_uprobe_multi_link_release(struct bpf_link *link)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
index 7eb79e0a5352..f7443e996b1b 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
@@ -1097,6 +1097,7 @@ static int trace_uprobe_enable(struct trace_uprobe *tu, filter_func_t filter)
static void __probe_event_disable(struct trace_probe *tp)
{
struct trace_uprobe *tu;
+ bool sync = false;
tu = container_of(tp, struct trace_uprobe, tp);
WARN_ON(!uprobe_filter_is_empty(tu->tp.event->filter));
@@ -1105,9 +1106,12 @@ static void __probe_event_disable(struct trace_probe *tp)
if (!tu->uprobe)
continue;
- uprobe_unregister(tu->uprobe, &tu->consumer);
+ uprobe_unregister_nosync(tu->uprobe, &tu->consumer);
+ sync = true;
tu->uprobe = NULL;
}
+ if (sync)
+ uprobe_unregister_sync();
}
static int probe_event_enable(struct trace_event_call *call,
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
index 73a6b041bcce..928c73cde32e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
@@ -478,7 +478,8 @@ static void testmod_unregister_uprobe(void)
mutex_lock(&testmod_uprobe_mutex);
if (uprobe.uprobe) {
- uprobe_unregister(uprobe.uprobe, &uprobe.consumer);
+ uprobe_unregister_nosync(uprobe.uprobe, &uprobe.consumer);
+ uprobe_unregister_sync();
uprobe.offset = 0;
uprobe.uprobe = NULL;
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-31 21:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-31 21:42 [PATCH 0/8] uprobes: RCU-protected hot path optimizations Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-31 21:42 ` [PATCH 1/8] rbtree: provide rb_find_rcu() / rb_find_add_rcu() Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-31 21:42 ` [PATCH 2/8] uprobes: revamp uprobe refcounting and lifetime management Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-01 11:09 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-08-01 16:49 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-01 22:07 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-02 8:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-08-02 14:58 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-02 22:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-08-02 11:11 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-08-02 15:03 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-05 13:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-08-05 17:29 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-06 10:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-07-31 21:42 ` [PATCH 3/8] uprobes: protected uprobe lifetime with SRCU Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-01 12:23 ` Liao, Chang
2024-08-01 16:49 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-02 1:30 ` Liao, Chang
2024-08-05 14:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-08-05 17:31 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-31 21:42 ` [PATCH 4/8] uprobes: get rid of enum uprobe_filter_ctx in uprobe filter callbacks Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-31 21:42 ` [PATCH 5/8] uprobes: travers uprobe's consumer list locklessly under SRCU protection Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-01 14:27 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-08-01 16:49 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-05 15:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-08-05 17:31 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-06 10:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-07-31 21:42 ` Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2024-08-02 2:41 ` [PATCH 6/8] perf/uprobe: split uprobe_unregister() Liao, Chang
2024-08-02 15:05 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-05 20:01 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-06 1:50 ` Liao, Chang
2024-08-07 13:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-08-07 15:24 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-31 21:42 ` [PATCH 7/8] uprobes: perform lockless SRCU-protected uprobes_tree lookup Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-07 17:14 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-08 10:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-08-08 14:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-08-08 17:00 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-08 13:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-08-10 14:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-07-31 21:42 ` [PATCH 8/8] uprobes: switch to RCU Tasks Trace flavor for better performance Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-01 9:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-08-01 16:49 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-01 18:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-08-07 13:29 ` [PATCH 0/8] uprobes: RCU-protected hot path optimizations Oleg Nesterov
2024-08-07 15:24 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-07 17:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-08-07 17:31 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-07 18:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-08-08 7:51 ` Liao, Chang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240731214256.3588718-7-andrii@kernel.org \
--to=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).