From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 290F76F30B for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2024 18:24:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723055094; cv=none; b=FOkpUQf7nyyUrBnWqkYenNY9cvgJxGXdB+5Vv/IMGFHkF6Zbw81IfG0RSOO+DfVYaDF575XustLQVVdCAXCgJUaqyE37nQxHjgkHBA6khj2EyEPTKDNznl7fxNLZIiu0xC+9QNuye9C4o/Rf1B3rat/5OQRQd/cM/cpnInLlXoI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723055094; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9D2wJx7b2TcE05VUmWhYDYryIterDH+F2PD6mBFHDzQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=A1MnVOWUY5EiWztdiBz2Si00cZXhxhQwA6V6ASq5ACeqWgNQH7ocJkXnzbvq1It3q2fx0WytAdjBcxY91/T6VXNOzEJLQapIHdZX/Y3NnLTmouY4FecrdZ7Zn4WPKps2KUz9H3ryEI32UrhollzMjO9xzcw+QMsKKOu0llv8HCU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=dELi+Jtw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="dELi+Jtw" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1723055092; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9D2wJx7b2TcE05VUmWhYDYryIterDH+F2PD6mBFHDzQ=; b=dELi+Jtwy+OqaH1oY2qABenM8LkoF7YrsSMR2JeybCxgj0uHiIbST5MinOPbHcxyxFhzMj LjW4hw4VlfUtaBn3dnlPwhshn2iWScEhMkRatGkDJeUSunXI25q8/4JGu03QGghUgpI9qK LNDk0bN/cbKKxPGTIvbeXkQSwoBDcpA= Received: from mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-645-8TT0jHODPPu6z4IrG3IxQQ-1; Wed, 07 Aug 2024 14:24:48 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 8TT0jHODPPu6z4IrG3IxQQ-1 Received: from mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93B07195608A; Wed, 7 Aug 2024 18:24:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-27-174.brq.redhat.com (unknown [10.45.224.97]) by mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4464319560A7; Wed, 7 Aug 2024 18:24:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dhcp-27-174.brq.redhat.com (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1000 oleg@redhat.com; Wed, 7 Aug 2024 20:24:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 20:24:39 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Andrii Nakryiko Cc: Liao Chang , Andrii Nakryiko , linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, paulmck@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] uprobes: RCU-protected hot path optimizations Message-ID: <20240807182438.GE27715@redhat.com> References: <20240731214256.3588718-1-andrii@kernel.org> <20240807132922.GC27715@redhat.com> <20240807171113.GD27715@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.12 On 08/07, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > Are you going to send a patch with > your bool flag proposal? No, I will wait for the next version from Liao. If he agrees with my comments. If not, we will continue the discussion in that thread. Note also another patch from Liao which removes ->siglock from uprobe_deny_signal(), https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240731095017.1560516-1-liaochang1@huawei.com/ Oleg.