From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF81762A02; Thu, 8 Aug 2024 00:21:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723076501; cv=none; b=KDUAOVFOTzws+6OO/7l+zpnl1mYKAu0ntg2tQOZcffK4sXylfewK42g3svA1cddV6yZ0uPn0VGQ9u8r4n2pgS8AkAXJm+7U9Ld4LoDH1McQpWZlVh681OJD68QJrjrtyY9Bp5KlxP576qth6oU5+6J5nrm6HxKkKVAIXenHhsl4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723076501; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FlwumTPkK9znp77L+yZCRb6Wa1pzQbmexyiDgFwB8MI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=IQAjeplB0PpUTH5jUkIp5kQNS+e9+5sUBR9CippFqzMBVp4VWt5BoVvJ/fvLmnfYJyfudHWk27uvx3rOnBF5v69zHs/JRDzNqyNS7BwtoW554nDxGtGpy/NgpCOp5FbkPwatSmj0dG6zdTldizIGWceicZz6WhGHOQ+Q1lu3f60= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=GP4NrAsT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="GP4NrAsT" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 05BEDC4AF0D; Thu, 8 Aug 2024 00:21:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1723076501; bh=FlwumTPkK9znp77L+yZCRb6Wa1pzQbmexyiDgFwB8MI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=GP4NrAsTUrhdK3uuxrbRtrfyYLe2vl9tXMdoT387oE6qsCygR0sRwiFy6cieGSORW XFoGy6ZfHS5YNsSImwzd5Ayv0a5CFy1RKN54H+TJJRIY2COvMfsjhB4ARdUu4Ys4dm +ecmY1NBjtQZgW0LGbbxW2tPm/ItryV3GmtZF5Z9qoauk83MIZuosu5tcNHYZ/6U4D de1a81+/vZyS9+jEXutuhYGKkyrhesa1+BgHdnk5I1HG4jrxWgNdO5U0J5NVEPSnO7 QWxUYrNd13nAB1610dhwhVf0ge3qhCocJMaqrpUTI/FK7yqAgl2Rcv5Bvto0szs+DN +C+DB26IimR1Q== From: Andrii Nakryiko To: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, oleg@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, paulmck@kernel.org, Andrii Nakryiko Subject: [PATCH v2 6/6] uprobes: switch to RCU Tasks Trace flavor for better performance Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 17:21:18 -0700 Message-ID: <20240808002118.918105-7-andrii@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.5 In-Reply-To: <20240808002118.918105-1-andrii@kernel.org> References: <20240808002118.918105-1-andrii@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit This patch switches uprobes SRCU usage to RCU Tasks Trace flavor, which is optimized for more lightweight and quick readers (at the expense of slower writers, which for uprobes is a fine tradeof) and has better performance and scalability with number of CPUs. Similarly to baseline vs SRCU, we've benchmarked SRCU-based implementation vs RCU Tasks Trace implementation. SRCU ==== uprobe-nop ( 1 cpus): 3.276 ± 0.005M/s ( 3.276M/s/cpu) uprobe-nop ( 2 cpus): 4.125 ± 0.002M/s ( 2.063M/s/cpu) uprobe-nop ( 4 cpus): 7.713 ± 0.002M/s ( 1.928M/s/cpu) uprobe-nop ( 8 cpus): 8.097 ± 0.006M/s ( 1.012M/s/cpu) uprobe-nop (16 cpus): 6.501 ± 0.056M/s ( 0.406M/s/cpu) uprobe-nop (32 cpus): 4.398 ± 0.084M/s ( 0.137M/s/cpu) uprobe-nop (64 cpus): 6.452 ± 0.000M/s ( 0.101M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 1 cpus): 2.055 ± 0.001M/s ( 2.055M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 2 cpus): 2.677 ± 0.000M/s ( 1.339M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 4 cpus): 4.561 ± 0.003M/s ( 1.140M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 8 cpus): 5.291 ± 0.002M/s ( 0.661M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (16 cpus): 5.065 ± 0.019M/s ( 0.317M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (32 cpus): 3.622 ± 0.003M/s ( 0.113M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (64 cpus): 3.723 ± 0.002M/s ( 0.058M/s/cpu) RCU Tasks Trace =============== uprobe-nop ( 1 cpus): 3.396 ± 0.002M/s ( 3.396M/s/cpu) uprobe-nop ( 2 cpus): 4.271 ± 0.006M/s ( 2.135M/s/cpu) uprobe-nop ( 4 cpus): 8.499 ± 0.015M/s ( 2.125M/s/cpu) uprobe-nop ( 8 cpus): 10.355 ± 0.028M/s ( 1.294M/s/cpu) uprobe-nop (16 cpus): 7.615 ± 0.099M/s ( 0.476M/s/cpu) uprobe-nop (32 cpus): 4.430 ± 0.007M/s ( 0.138M/s/cpu) uprobe-nop (64 cpus): 6.887 ± 0.020M/s ( 0.108M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 1 cpus): 2.174 ± 0.001M/s ( 2.174M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 2 cpus): 2.853 ± 0.001M/s ( 1.426M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 4 cpus): 4.913 ± 0.002M/s ( 1.228M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 8 cpus): 5.883 ± 0.002M/s ( 0.735M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (16 cpus): 5.147 ± 0.001M/s ( 0.322M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (32 cpus): 3.738 ± 0.008M/s ( 0.117M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (64 cpus): 4.397 ± 0.002M/s ( 0.069M/s/cpu) Peak throughput for uprobes increases from 8 mln/s to 10.3 mln/s (+28%!), and for uretprobes from 5.3 mln/s to 5.8 mln/s (+11%), as we have more work to do on uretprobes side. Even single-thread (no contention) performance is slightly better: 3.276 mln/s to 3.396 mln/s (+3.5%) for uprobes, and 2.055 mln/s to 2.174 mln/s (+5.8%) for uretprobes. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko --- kernel/events/uprobes.c | 37 +++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c index 419085741850..b3b98c635422 100644 --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c @@ -41,8 +41,6 @@ static struct rb_root uprobes_tree = RB_ROOT; static DEFINE_RWLOCK(uprobes_treelock); /* serialize rbtree access */ -DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU(uprobes_srcu); - #define UPROBES_HASH_SZ 13 /* serialize uprobe->pending_list */ static struct mutex uprobes_mmap_mutex[UPROBES_HASH_SZ]; @@ -650,7 +648,7 @@ static void put_uprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe) delayed_uprobe_remove(uprobe, NULL); mutex_unlock(&delayed_uprobe_lock); - call_srcu(&uprobes_srcu, &uprobe->rcu, uprobe_free_rcu); + call_rcu_tasks_trace(&uprobe->rcu, uprobe_free_rcu); } static __always_inline @@ -704,7 +702,7 @@ static struct uprobe *find_uprobe_rcu(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset) }; struct rb_node *node; - lockdep_assert(srcu_read_lock_held(&uprobes_srcu)); + lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_trace_held()); read_lock(&uprobes_treelock); node = rb_find(&key, &uprobes_tree, __uprobe_cmp_key); @@ -908,8 +906,7 @@ static bool filter_chain(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct mm_struct *mm) bool ret = false; down_read(&uprobe->consumer_rwsem); - list_for_each_entry_srcu(uc, &uprobe->consumers, cons_node, - srcu_read_lock_held(&uprobes_srcu)) { + list_for_each_entry_rcu(uc, &uprobe->consumers, cons_node, rcu_read_lock_trace_held()) { ret = consumer_filter(uc, mm); if (ret) break; @@ -1132,7 +1129,7 @@ void uprobe_unregister_sync(void) * unlucky enough caller can free consumer's memory and cause * handler_chain() or handle_uretprobe_chain() to do an use-after-free. */ - synchronize_srcu(&uprobes_srcu); + synchronize_rcu_tasks_trace(); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uprobe_unregister_sync); @@ -1216,19 +1213,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uprobe_register); int uprobe_apply(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc, bool add) { struct uprobe_consumer *con; - int ret = -ENOENT, srcu_idx; + int ret = -ENOENT; down_write(&uprobe->register_rwsem); - srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&uprobes_srcu); - list_for_each_entry_srcu(con, &uprobe->consumers, cons_node, - srcu_read_lock_held(&uprobes_srcu)) { + rcu_read_lock_trace(); + list_for_each_entry_rcu(con, &uprobe->consumers, cons_node, rcu_read_lock_trace_held()) { if (con == uc) { ret = register_for_each_vma(uprobe, add ? uc : NULL); break; } } - srcu_read_unlock(&uprobes_srcu, srcu_idx); + rcu_read_unlock_trace(); up_write(&uprobe->register_rwsem); @@ -2099,8 +2095,7 @@ static void handler_chain(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs) current->utask->auprobe = &uprobe->arch; - list_for_each_entry_srcu(uc, &uprobe->consumers, cons_node, - srcu_read_lock_held(&uprobes_srcu)) { + list_for_each_entry_rcu(uc, &uprobe->consumers, cons_node, rcu_read_lock_trace_held()) { int rc = 0; if (uc->handler) { @@ -2138,15 +2133,13 @@ handle_uretprobe_chain(struct return_instance *ri, struct pt_regs *regs) { struct uprobe *uprobe = ri->uprobe; struct uprobe_consumer *uc; - int srcu_idx; - srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&uprobes_srcu); - list_for_each_entry_srcu(uc, &uprobe->consumers, cons_node, - srcu_read_lock_held(&uprobes_srcu)) { + rcu_read_lock_trace(); + list_for_each_entry_rcu(uc, &uprobe->consumers, cons_node, rcu_read_lock_trace_held()) { if (uc->ret_handler) uc->ret_handler(uc, ri->func, regs); } - srcu_read_unlock(&uprobes_srcu, srcu_idx); + rcu_read_unlock_trace(); } static struct return_instance *find_next_ret_chain(struct return_instance *ri) @@ -2231,13 +2224,13 @@ static void handle_swbp(struct pt_regs *regs) { struct uprobe *uprobe; unsigned long bp_vaddr; - int is_swbp, srcu_idx; + int is_swbp; bp_vaddr = uprobe_get_swbp_addr(regs); if (bp_vaddr == uprobe_get_trampoline_vaddr()) return uprobe_handle_trampoline(regs); - srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&uprobes_srcu); + rcu_read_lock_trace(); uprobe = find_active_uprobe_rcu(bp_vaddr, &is_swbp); if (!uprobe) { @@ -2295,7 +2288,7 @@ static void handle_swbp(struct pt_regs *regs) out: /* arch_uprobe_skip_sstep() succeeded, or restart if can't singlestep */ - srcu_read_unlock(&uprobes_srcu, srcu_idx); + rcu_read_unlock_trace(); } /* -- 2.43.5