From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23DC7194AE8; Thu, 5 Sep 2024 08:58:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725526706; cv=none; b=gwhgijZ3rLfa2iYgCefOX4dqwsILssBXov5pgMIzdODybVUx69c5ksEC0wxj88Ww2uXEYYJa0qMOsWNp4/1qtl4WEht4VIMBo0pY73kjFK51JcgApVgwzFf26LHfZ5lKPOwkXJHO2NxTLFp+rhU5j7P98f+/6Of2wFPRl+YAZKw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725526706; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gtASPCCOLpt9xwZw3BP2/0cX0MaF3P8nY6xQev3A9po=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=iZgVejHS+ibJ2wbK68ZGhlF+0rAENL2xqf71Gayqa6V1pmBl4OYxQ7aLBadSzoxkcfDAuhkjRpGvG5L9vVj9R6MbmJWNEI8cVG1XhXiiUH8Me2iWklrwm9KSPRVh2otYueNxy6OmFjbgpXIeN1ZvRr7WVqavFbC48w/UOEhGau8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=FdUPKyIj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="FdUPKyIj" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1725526704; x=1757062704; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=gtASPCCOLpt9xwZw3BP2/0cX0MaF3P8nY6xQev3A9po=; b=FdUPKyIjk4U3PIzCOp9mIRiSGsb+hT6AQq0lFnHB3M53tiUhZP9uFgvY e8erTMfzOhK2oHhdZTqeAJU13/u59Ti8R47KxM7J7CjMYq4h9CZGudws0 hh1Rdlu7UtE5DuUQ4tFongHKjsWxp+tGrhLVhmhVMRpzAWoF0yDupdzLM qbAOIQqraRdSHBLirGOv7HWa8HlietAjRe2RL28cJLnXYbj41AAUG1YYy N18dg4odO1mlSqvNjEot+G4WRlhrF42VeoXIiuZcA0Al+Bfw8836FIeiq kktFGZD42i3aPQ2A/209WRT+9CTGwhBJSGDp7e/EBN964YyDl401nEfa5 A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: tQmTW5B4S0CZ6Ls5aPEngw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: RvFeA7GwQZCLMsgt2UYD+w== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11185"; a="13383345" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,204,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="13383345" Received: from orviesa005.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.145]) by fmvoesa110.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Sep 2024 01:58:24 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: NH9v33D9RO65q6VCwKNZFw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: BJo+7ka/QKCFaF62TQOahQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,204,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="70356682" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 9c6b1c7d3b50) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Sep 2024 01:58:19 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 9c6b1c7d3b50 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1sm8Jl-00098x-2K; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 08:58:17 +0000 Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 16:58:07 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Sven Schnelle , Steven Rostedt , Masami Hiramatsu , Mark Rutland , Mathieu Desnoyers , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] x86/tracing: pass ftrace_regs to function_graph_enter() Message-ID: <202409051620.5YBbYREt-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240904065908.1009086-3-svens@linux.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240904065908.1009086-3-svens@linux.ibm.com> Hi Sven, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on s390/features] [also build test WARNING on tip/x86/core linus/master v6.11-rc6 next-20240904] [cannot apply to rostedt-trace/for-next rostedt-trace/for-next-urgent] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Sven-Schnelle/tracing-add-ftrace_regs-to-function_graph_enter/20240904-150232 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git features patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904065908.1009086-3-svens%40linux.ibm.com patch subject: [PATCH 2/7] x86/tracing: pass ftrace_regs to function_graph_enter() config: x86_64-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240905/202409051620.5YBbYREt-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-12) 11.3.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240905/202409051620.5YBbYREt-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409051620.5YBbYREt-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from include/linux/ftrace.h:23, from include/linux/kprobes.h:28, from arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c:35: >> arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h:108:64: warning: 'struct ftrace_regs' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration 108 | unsigned long frame_pointer, struct ftrace_regs *regs); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ vim +108 arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h 106 107 void prepare_ftrace_return(unsigned long ip, unsigned long *parent, > 108 unsigned long frame_pointer, struct ftrace_regs *regs); 109 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki