* [PATCHv9 bpf-next 00/13] bpf: Add uprobe session support
@ 2024-11-08 13:45 Jiri Olsa
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 01/13] bpf: Allow return values 0 and 1 for kprobe session Jiri Olsa
` (13 more replies)
0 siblings, 14 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2024-11-08 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleg Nesterov, Peter Zijlstra, Alexei Starovoitov,
Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko
Cc: bpf, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, John Fastabend,
KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Steven Rostedt,
Masami Hiramatsu, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel
hi,
this patchset is adding support for session uprobe attachment and
using it through bpf link for bpf programs.
The session means that the uprobe consumer is executed on entry
and return of probed function with additional control:
- entry callback can control execution of the return callback
- entry and return callbacks can share data/cookie
Uprobe changes (on top of perf/core [1] are posted in here [2].
This patchset is based on bpf-next/master and will be merged once
we pull [2] in bpf-next/master.
v9 changes:
- rebased on bpf-next/master with perf/core tag merged (thanks Peter!)
thanks,
jirka
[1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git perf/core
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241018202252.693462-1-jolsa@kernel.org/T/#ma43c549c4bf684ca1b17fa638aa5e7cbb46893e9
---
Jiri Olsa (13):
bpf: Allow return values 0 and 1 for kprobe session
bpf: Force uprobe bpf program to always return 0
bpf: Add support for uprobe multi session attach
bpf: Add support for uprobe multi session context
libbpf: Add support for uprobe multi session attach
selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session test
selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session cookie test
selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session recursive test
selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session verifier test for return value
selftests/bpf: Add kprobe session verifier test for return value
selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session single consumer test
selftests/bpf: Add uprobe sessions to consumer test
selftests/bpf: Add threads to consumer test
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 9 ++-
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 10 +++
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 57 +++++++++++----
tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c | 1 +
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 19 ++++-
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 4 +-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c | 2 +
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c | 337 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_multi_verifier.c | 31 ++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_consumers.c | 6 +-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_cookie.c | 48 ++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_recursive.c | 44 +++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_single.c | 44 +++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_verifier.c | 31 ++++++++
17 files changed, 653 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_multi_verifier.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_cookie.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_recursive.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_single.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_verifier.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv9 bpf-next 01/13] bpf: Allow return values 0 and 1 for kprobe session
2024-11-08 13:45 [PATCHv9 bpf-next 00/13] bpf: Add uprobe session support Jiri Olsa
@ 2024-11-08 13:45 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 02/13] bpf: Force uprobe bpf program to always return 0 Jiri Olsa
` (12 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2024-11-08 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleg Nesterov, Peter Zijlstra, Alexei Starovoitov,
Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko
Cc: bpf, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, John Fastabend,
KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Steven Rostedt,
Masami Hiramatsu, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel
The kprobe session program can return only 0 or 1,
instruct verifier to check for that.
Fixes: 535a3692ba72 ("bpf: Add support for kprobe session attach")
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 7958d6ff6b73..7d8ed377b35d 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -16024,6 +16024,15 @@ static int check_return_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, const char
return -ENOTSUPP;
}
break;
+ case BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE:
+ switch (env->prog->expected_attach_type) {
+ case BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_SESSION:
+ range = retval_range(0, 1);
+ break;
+ default:
+ return 0;
+ }
+ break;
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP:
range = retval_range(SK_DROP, SK_PASS);
break;
--
2.47.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv9 bpf-next 02/13] bpf: Force uprobe bpf program to always return 0
2024-11-08 13:45 [PATCHv9 bpf-next 00/13] bpf: Add uprobe session support Jiri Olsa
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 01/13] bpf: Allow return values 0 and 1 for kprobe session Jiri Olsa
@ 2024-11-08 13:45 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 03/13] bpf: Add support for uprobe multi session attach Jiri Olsa
` (11 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2024-11-08 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleg Nesterov, Peter Zijlstra, Alexei Starovoitov,
Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko
Cc: bpf, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, John Fastabend,
KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Steven Rostedt,
Masami Hiramatsu, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel
As suggested by Andrii make uprobe multi bpf programs to always return 0,
so they can't force uprobe removal.
Keeping the int return type for uprobe_prog_run, because it will be used
in following session changes.
Fixes: 89ae89f53d20 ("bpf: Add multi uprobe link")
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 88fd628850ca..db9e2792b42b 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -3229,7 +3229,6 @@ static int uprobe_prog_run(struct bpf_uprobe *uprobe,
struct bpf_prog *prog = link->link.prog;
bool sleepable = prog->sleepable;
struct bpf_run_ctx *old_run_ctx;
- int err = 0;
if (link->task && !same_thread_group(current, link->task))
return 0;
@@ -3242,7 +3241,7 @@ static int uprobe_prog_run(struct bpf_uprobe *uprobe,
migrate_disable();
old_run_ctx = bpf_set_run_ctx(&run_ctx.run_ctx);
- err = bpf_prog_run(link->link.prog, regs);
+ bpf_prog_run(link->link.prog, regs);
bpf_reset_run_ctx(old_run_ctx);
migrate_enable();
@@ -3251,7 +3250,7 @@ static int uprobe_prog_run(struct bpf_uprobe *uprobe,
rcu_read_unlock_trace();
else
rcu_read_unlock();
- return err;
+ return 0;
}
static bool
--
2.47.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv9 bpf-next 03/13] bpf: Add support for uprobe multi session attach
2024-11-08 13:45 [PATCHv9 bpf-next 00/13] bpf: Add uprobe session support Jiri Olsa
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 01/13] bpf: Allow return values 0 and 1 for kprobe session Jiri Olsa
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 02/13] bpf: Force uprobe bpf program to always return 0 Jiri Olsa
@ 2024-11-08 13:45 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 04/13] bpf: Add support for uprobe multi session context Jiri Olsa
` (10 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2024-11-08 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleg Nesterov, Peter Zijlstra, Alexei Starovoitov,
Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko
Cc: bpf, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, John Fastabend,
KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Steven Rostedt,
Masami Hiramatsu, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel
Adding support to attach BPF program for entry and return probe
of the same function. This is common use case which at the moment
requires to create two uprobe multi links.
Adding new BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION attach type that instructs
kernel to attach single link program to both entry and exit probe.
It's possible to control execution of the BPF program on return
probe simply by returning zero or non zero from the entry BPF
program execution to execute or not the BPF program on return
probe respectively.
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 9 +++++++--
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 1 +
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 1 +
6 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index f28b6527e815..4162afc6b5d0 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1116,6 +1116,7 @@ enum bpf_attach_type {
BPF_NETKIT_PRIMARY,
BPF_NETKIT_PEER,
BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_SESSION,
+ BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION,
__MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE
};
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 8254b2973157..58190ca724a2 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -4103,10 +4103,14 @@ static int bpf_prog_attach_check_attach_type(const struct bpf_prog *prog,
if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI &&
attach_type != BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI)
return -EINVAL;
+ if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION &&
+ attach_type != BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION)
+ return -EINVAL;
if (attach_type != BPF_PERF_EVENT &&
attach_type != BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_MULTI &&
attach_type != BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_SESSION &&
- attach_type != BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI)
+ attach_type != BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI &&
+ attach_type != BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION)
return -EINVAL;
return 0;
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS:
@@ -5359,7 +5363,8 @@ static int link_create(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
else if (attr->link_create.attach_type == BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_MULTI ||
attr->link_create.attach_type == BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_SESSION)
ret = bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach(attr, prog);
- else if (attr->link_create.attach_type == BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI)
+ else if (attr->link_create.attach_type == BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI ||
+ attr->link_create.attach_type == BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION)
ret = bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach(attr, prog);
break;
default:
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 7d8ed377b35d..132fc172961f 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -16027,6 +16027,7 @@ static int check_return_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, const char
case BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE:
switch (env->prog->expected_attach_type) {
case BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_SESSION:
+ case BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION:
range = retval_range(0, 1);
break;
default:
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index db9e2792b42b..9c04b1364de2 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -1581,6 +1581,17 @@ static inline bool is_kprobe_session(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
return prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_SESSION;
}
+static inline bool is_uprobe_multi(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+ return prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI ||
+ prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION;
+}
+
+static inline bool is_uprobe_session(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+ return prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION;
+}
+
static const struct bpf_func_proto *
kprobe_prog_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
@@ -1598,13 +1609,13 @@ kprobe_prog_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
case BPF_FUNC_get_func_ip:
if (is_kprobe_multi(prog))
return &bpf_get_func_ip_proto_kprobe_multi;
- if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI)
+ if (is_uprobe_multi(prog))
return &bpf_get_func_ip_proto_uprobe_multi;
return &bpf_get_func_ip_proto_kprobe;
case BPF_FUNC_get_attach_cookie:
if (is_kprobe_multi(prog))
return &bpf_get_attach_cookie_proto_kmulti;
- if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI)
+ if (is_uprobe_multi(prog))
return &bpf_get_attach_cookie_proto_umulti;
return &bpf_get_attach_cookie_proto_trace;
default:
@@ -3096,6 +3107,7 @@ struct bpf_uprobe {
u64 cookie;
struct uprobe *uprobe;
struct uprobe_consumer consumer;
+ bool session;
};
struct bpf_uprobe_multi_link {
@@ -3267,9 +3279,13 @@ uprobe_multi_link_handler(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs,
__u64 *data)
{
struct bpf_uprobe *uprobe;
+ int ret;
uprobe = container_of(con, struct bpf_uprobe, consumer);
- return uprobe_prog_run(uprobe, instruction_pointer(regs), regs);
+ ret = uprobe_prog_run(uprobe, instruction_pointer(regs), regs);
+ if (uprobe->session)
+ return ret ? UPROBE_HANDLER_IGNORE : 0;
+ return 0;
}
static int
@@ -3279,7 +3295,8 @@ uprobe_multi_link_ret_handler(struct uprobe_consumer *con, unsigned long func, s
struct bpf_uprobe *uprobe;
uprobe = container_of(con, struct bpf_uprobe, consumer);
- return uprobe_prog_run(uprobe, func, regs);
+ uprobe_prog_run(uprobe, func, regs);
+ return 0;
}
static u64 bpf_uprobe_multi_entry_ip(struct bpf_run_ctx *ctx)
@@ -3318,7 +3335,7 @@ int bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *pr
if (sizeof(u64) != sizeof(void *))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- if (prog->expected_attach_type != BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI)
+ if (!is_uprobe_multi(prog))
return -EINVAL;
flags = attr->link_create.uprobe_multi.flags;
@@ -3394,11 +3411,12 @@ int bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *pr
uprobes[i].link = link;
- if (flags & BPF_F_UPROBE_MULTI_RETURN)
- uprobes[i].consumer.ret_handler = uprobe_multi_link_ret_handler;
- else
+ if (!(flags & BPF_F_UPROBE_MULTI_RETURN))
uprobes[i].consumer.handler = uprobe_multi_link_handler;
-
+ if (flags & BPF_F_UPROBE_MULTI_RETURN || is_uprobe_session(prog))
+ uprobes[i].consumer.ret_handler = uprobe_multi_link_ret_handler;
+ if (is_uprobe_session(prog))
+ uprobes[i].session = true;
if (pid)
uprobes[i].consumer.filter = uprobe_multi_link_filter;
}
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index f28b6527e815..4162afc6b5d0 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1116,6 +1116,7 @@ enum bpf_attach_type {
BPF_NETKIT_PRIMARY,
BPF_NETKIT_PEER,
BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_SESSION,
+ BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION,
__MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE
};
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index 711173acbcef..faac1c79840d 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ static const char * const attach_type_name[] = {
[BPF_NETKIT_PRIMARY] = "netkit_primary",
[BPF_NETKIT_PEER] = "netkit_peer",
[BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_SESSION] = "trace_kprobe_session",
+ [BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION] = "trace_uprobe_session",
};
static const char * const link_type_name[] = {
--
2.47.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv9 bpf-next 04/13] bpf: Add support for uprobe multi session context
2024-11-08 13:45 [PATCHv9 bpf-next 00/13] bpf: Add uprobe session support Jiri Olsa
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 03/13] bpf: Add support for uprobe multi session attach Jiri Olsa
@ 2024-11-08 13:45 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 05/13] libbpf: Add support for uprobe multi session attach Jiri Olsa
` (9 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2024-11-08 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleg Nesterov, Peter Zijlstra, Alexei Starovoitov,
Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko
Cc: bpf, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, John Fastabend,
KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Steven Rostedt,
Masami Hiramatsu, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel
Placing bpf_session_run_ctx layer in between bpf_run_ctx and
bpf_uprobe_multi_run_ctx, so the session data can be retrieved
from uprobe_multi link.
Plus granting session kfuncs access to uprobe session programs.
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 9c04b1364de2..949a3870946c 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -3120,7 +3120,7 @@ struct bpf_uprobe_multi_link {
};
struct bpf_uprobe_multi_run_ctx {
- struct bpf_run_ctx run_ctx;
+ struct bpf_session_run_ctx session_ctx;
unsigned long entry_ip;
struct bpf_uprobe *uprobe;
};
@@ -3231,16 +3231,22 @@ static const struct bpf_link_ops bpf_uprobe_multi_link_lops = {
static int uprobe_prog_run(struct bpf_uprobe *uprobe,
unsigned long entry_ip,
- struct pt_regs *regs)
+ struct pt_regs *regs,
+ bool is_return, void *data)
{
struct bpf_uprobe_multi_link *link = uprobe->link;
struct bpf_uprobe_multi_run_ctx run_ctx = {
+ .session_ctx = {
+ .is_return = is_return,
+ .data = data,
+ },
.entry_ip = entry_ip,
.uprobe = uprobe,
};
struct bpf_prog *prog = link->link.prog;
bool sleepable = prog->sleepable;
struct bpf_run_ctx *old_run_ctx;
+ int err;
if (link->task && !same_thread_group(current, link->task))
return 0;
@@ -3252,8 +3258,8 @@ static int uprobe_prog_run(struct bpf_uprobe *uprobe,
migrate_disable();
- old_run_ctx = bpf_set_run_ctx(&run_ctx.run_ctx);
- bpf_prog_run(link->link.prog, regs);
+ old_run_ctx = bpf_set_run_ctx(&run_ctx.session_ctx.run_ctx);
+ err = bpf_prog_run(link->link.prog, regs);
bpf_reset_run_ctx(old_run_ctx);
migrate_enable();
@@ -3262,7 +3268,7 @@ static int uprobe_prog_run(struct bpf_uprobe *uprobe,
rcu_read_unlock_trace();
else
rcu_read_unlock();
- return 0;
+ return err;
}
static bool
@@ -3282,7 +3288,7 @@ uprobe_multi_link_handler(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs,
int ret;
uprobe = container_of(con, struct bpf_uprobe, consumer);
- ret = uprobe_prog_run(uprobe, instruction_pointer(regs), regs);
+ ret = uprobe_prog_run(uprobe, instruction_pointer(regs), regs, false, data);
if (uprobe->session)
return ret ? UPROBE_HANDLER_IGNORE : 0;
return 0;
@@ -3295,7 +3301,7 @@ uprobe_multi_link_ret_handler(struct uprobe_consumer *con, unsigned long func, s
struct bpf_uprobe *uprobe;
uprobe = container_of(con, struct bpf_uprobe, consumer);
- uprobe_prog_run(uprobe, func, regs);
+ uprobe_prog_run(uprobe, func, regs, true, data);
return 0;
}
@@ -3303,7 +3309,8 @@ static u64 bpf_uprobe_multi_entry_ip(struct bpf_run_ctx *ctx)
{
struct bpf_uprobe_multi_run_ctx *run_ctx;
- run_ctx = container_of(current->bpf_ctx, struct bpf_uprobe_multi_run_ctx, run_ctx);
+ run_ctx = container_of(current->bpf_ctx, struct bpf_uprobe_multi_run_ctx,
+ session_ctx.run_ctx);
return run_ctx->entry_ip;
}
@@ -3311,7 +3318,8 @@ static u64 bpf_uprobe_multi_cookie(struct bpf_run_ctx *ctx)
{
struct bpf_uprobe_multi_run_ctx *run_ctx;
- run_ctx = container_of(current->bpf_ctx, struct bpf_uprobe_multi_run_ctx, run_ctx);
+ run_ctx = container_of(current->bpf_ctx, struct bpf_uprobe_multi_run_ctx,
+ session_ctx.run_ctx);
return run_ctx->uprobe->cookie;
}
@@ -3505,7 +3513,7 @@ static int bpf_kprobe_multi_filter(const struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 kfunc_id)
if (!btf_id_set8_contains(&kprobe_multi_kfunc_set_ids, kfunc_id))
return 0;
- if (!is_kprobe_session(prog))
+ if (!is_kprobe_session(prog) && !is_uprobe_session(prog))
return -EACCES;
return 0;
--
2.47.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv9 bpf-next 05/13] libbpf: Add support for uprobe multi session attach
2024-11-08 13:45 [PATCHv9 bpf-next 00/13] bpf: Add uprobe session support Jiri Olsa
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 04/13] bpf: Add support for uprobe multi session context Jiri Olsa
@ 2024-11-08 13:45 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-11-15 3:59 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 06/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session test Jiri Olsa
` (8 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2024-11-08 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleg Nesterov, Peter Zijlstra, Alexei Starovoitov,
Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko
Cc: bpf, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, John Fastabend,
KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Steven Rostedt,
Masami Hiramatsu, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel
Adding support to attach program in uprobe session mode
with bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi function.
Adding session bool to bpf_uprobe_multi_opts struct that allows
to load and attach the bpf program via uprobe session.
the attachment to create uprobe multi session.
Also adding new program loader section that allows:
SEC("uprobe.session/bpf_fentry_test*")
and loads/attaches uprobe program as uprobe session.
Adding sleepable hook (uprobe.session.s) as well.
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c | 1 +
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 4 +++-
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
index 2a4c71501a17..becdfa701c75 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
@@ -776,6 +776,7 @@ int bpf_link_create(int prog_fd, int target_fd,
return libbpf_err(-EINVAL);
break;
case BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI:
+ case BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION:
attr.link_create.uprobe_multi.flags = OPTS_GET(opts, uprobe_multi.flags, 0);
attr.link_create.uprobe_multi.cnt = OPTS_GET(opts, uprobe_multi.cnt, 0);
attr.link_create.uprobe_multi.path = ptr_to_u64(OPTS_GET(opts, uprobe_multi.path, 0));
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index faac1c79840d..a2bc5bea7ea3 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -9442,8 +9442,10 @@ static const struct bpf_sec_def section_defs[] = {
SEC_DEF("kprobe.session+", KPROBE, BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_SESSION, SEC_NONE, attach_kprobe_session),
SEC_DEF("uprobe.multi+", KPROBE, BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI, SEC_NONE, attach_uprobe_multi),
SEC_DEF("uretprobe.multi+", KPROBE, BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI, SEC_NONE, attach_uprobe_multi),
+ SEC_DEF("uprobe.session+", KPROBE, BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION, SEC_NONE, attach_uprobe_multi),
SEC_DEF("uprobe.multi.s+", KPROBE, BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI, SEC_SLEEPABLE, attach_uprobe_multi),
SEC_DEF("uretprobe.multi.s+", KPROBE, BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI, SEC_SLEEPABLE, attach_uprobe_multi),
+ SEC_DEF("uprobe.session.s+", KPROBE, BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION, SEC_SLEEPABLE, attach_uprobe_multi),
SEC_DEF("ksyscall+", KPROBE, 0, SEC_NONE, attach_ksyscall),
SEC_DEF("kretsyscall+", KPROBE, 0, SEC_NONE, attach_ksyscall),
SEC_DEF("usdt+", KPROBE, 0, SEC_USDT, attach_usdt),
@@ -11765,7 +11767,9 @@ static int attach_uprobe_multi(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie, stru
ret = 0;
break;
case 3:
+ opts.session = str_has_pfx(probe_type, "uprobe.session");
opts.retprobe = str_has_pfx(probe_type, "uretprobe.multi");
+
*link = bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi(prog, -1, binary_path, func_name, &opts);
ret = libbpf_get_error(*link);
break;
@@ -12014,10 +12018,12 @@ bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi(const struct bpf_program *prog,
const unsigned long *ref_ctr_offsets = NULL, *offsets = NULL;
LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_link_create_opts, lopts);
unsigned long *resolved_offsets = NULL;
+ enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
int err = 0, link_fd, prog_fd;
struct bpf_link *link = NULL;
char errmsg[STRERR_BUFSIZE];
char full_path[PATH_MAX];
+ bool retprobe, session;
const __u64 *cookies;
const char **syms;
size_t cnt;
@@ -12088,12 +12094,20 @@ bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi(const struct bpf_program *prog,
offsets = resolved_offsets;
}
+ retprobe = OPTS_GET(opts, retprobe, false);
+ session = OPTS_GET(opts, session, false);
+
+ if (retprobe && session)
+ return libbpf_err_ptr(-EINVAL);
+
+ attach_type = session ? BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION : BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI;
+
lopts.uprobe_multi.path = path;
lopts.uprobe_multi.offsets = offsets;
lopts.uprobe_multi.ref_ctr_offsets = ref_ctr_offsets;
lopts.uprobe_multi.cookies = cookies;
lopts.uprobe_multi.cnt = cnt;
- lopts.uprobe_multi.flags = OPTS_GET(opts, retprobe, false) ? BPF_F_UPROBE_MULTI_RETURN : 0;
+ lopts.uprobe_multi.flags = retprobe ? BPF_F_UPROBE_MULTI_RETURN : 0;
if (pid == 0)
pid = getpid();
@@ -12107,7 +12121,7 @@ bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi(const struct bpf_program *prog,
}
link->detach = &bpf_link__detach_fd;
- link_fd = bpf_link_create(prog_fd, 0, BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI, &lopts);
+ link_fd = bpf_link_create(prog_fd, 0, attach_type, &lopts);
if (link_fd < 0) {
err = -errno;
pr_warn("prog '%s': failed to attach multi-uprobe: %s\n",
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
index 91484303849c..b2ce3a72b11d 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
@@ -577,10 +577,12 @@ struct bpf_uprobe_multi_opts {
size_t cnt;
/* create return uprobes */
bool retprobe;
+ /* create session kprobes */
+ bool session;
size_t :0;
};
-#define bpf_uprobe_multi_opts__last_field retprobe
+#define bpf_uprobe_multi_opts__last_field session
/**
* @brief **bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi()** attaches a BPF program
--
2.47.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv9 bpf-next 06/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session test
2024-11-08 13:45 [PATCHv9 bpf-next 00/13] bpf: Add uprobe session support Jiri Olsa
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 05/13] libbpf: Add support for uprobe multi session attach Jiri Olsa
@ 2024-11-08 13:45 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 07/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session cookie test Jiri Olsa
` (7 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2024-11-08 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleg Nesterov, Peter Zijlstra, Alexei Starovoitov,
Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko
Cc: bpf, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, John Fastabend,
KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Steven Rostedt,
Masami Hiramatsu, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel
Adding uprobe session test and testing that the entry program
return value controls execution of the return probe program.
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
.../bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c | 47 ++++++++++++
.../bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 118 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
index 616441fdd7f2..d9c20ca7a833 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
#include "uprobe_multi_usdt.skel.h"
#include "uprobe_multi_consumers.skel.h"
#include "uprobe_multi_pid_filter.skel.h"
+#include "uprobe_multi_session.skel.h"
#include "bpf/libbpf_internal.h"
#include "testing_helpers.h"
#include "../sdt.h"
@@ -1017,6 +1018,50 @@ static void test_pid_filter_process(bool clone_vm)
uprobe_multi_pid_filter__destroy(skel);
}
+static void test_session_skel_api(void)
+{
+ struct uprobe_multi_session *skel = NULL;
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_kprobe_multi_opts, opts);
+ struct bpf_link *link = NULL;
+ int err;
+
+ skel = uprobe_multi_session__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "uprobe_multi_session__open_and_load"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ skel->bss->pid = getpid();
+ skel->bss->user_ptr = test_data;
+
+ err = uprobe_multi_session__attach(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "uprobe_multi_session__attach"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ /* trigger all probes */
+ skel->bss->uprobe_multi_func_1_addr = (__u64) uprobe_multi_func_1;
+ skel->bss->uprobe_multi_func_2_addr = (__u64) uprobe_multi_func_2;
+ skel->bss->uprobe_multi_func_3_addr = (__u64) uprobe_multi_func_3;
+
+ uprobe_multi_func_1();
+ uprobe_multi_func_2();
+ uprobe_multi_func_3();
+
+ /*
+ * We expect 2 for uprobe_multi_func_2 because it runs both entry/return probe,
+ * uprobe_multi_func_[13] run just the entry probe. All expected numbers are
+ * doubled, because we run extra test for sleepable session.
+ */
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->uprobe_session_result[0], 2, "uprobe_multi_func_1_result");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->uprobe_session_result[1], 4, "uprobe_multi_func_2_result");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->uprobe_session_result[2], 2, "uprobe_multi_func_3_result");
+
+ /* We expect increase in 3 entry and 1 return session calls -> 4 */
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->uprobe_multi_sleep_result, 4, "uprobe_multi_sleep_result");
+
+cleanup:
+ bpf_link__destroy(link);
+ uprobe_multi_session__destroy(skel);
+}
+
static void test_bench_attach_uprobe(void)
{
long attach_start_ns = 0, attach_end_ns = 0;
@@ -1113,4 +1158,6 @@ void test_uprobe_multi_test(void)
test_pid_filter_process(false);
if (test__start_subtest("filter_clone_vm"))
test_pid_filter_process(true);
+ if (test__start_subtest("session"))
+ test_session_skel_api();
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..30bff90b68dc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session.c
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include <stdbool.h>
+#include "bpf_kfuncs.h"
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+__u64 uprobe_multi_func_1_addr = 0;
+__u64 uprobe_multi_func_2_addr = 0;
+__u64 uprobe_multi_func_3_addr = 0;
+
+__u64 uprobe_session_result[3] = {};
+__u64 uprobe_multi_sleep_result = 0;
+
+void *user_ptr = 0;
+int pid = 0;
+
+static int uprobe_multi_check(void *ctx, bool is_return)
+{
+ const __u64 funcs[] = {
+ uprobe_multi_func_1_addr,
+ uprobe_multi_func_2_addr,
+ uprobe_multi_func_3_addr,
+ };
+ unsigned int i;
+ __u64 addr;
+
+ if (bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32 != pid)
+ return 1;
+
+ addr = bpf_get_func_ip(ctx);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(funcs); i++) {
+ if (funcs[i] == addr) {
+ uprobe_session_result[i]++;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* only uprobe_multi_func_2 executes return probe */
+ if ((addr == uprobe_multi_func_1_addr) ||
+ (addr == uprobe_multi_func_3_addr))
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("uprobe.session//proc/self/exe:uprobe_multi_func_*")
+int uprobe(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+ return uprobe_multi_check(ctx, bpf_session_is_return());
+}
+
+static __always_inline bool verify_sleepable_user_copy(void)
+{
+ char data[9];
+
+ bpf_copy_from_user(data, sizeof(data), user_ptr);
+ return bpf_strncmp(data, sizeof(data), "test_data") == 0;
+}
+
+SEC("uprobe.session.s//proc/self/exe:uprobe_multi_func_*")
+int uprobe_sleepable(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+ if (verify_sleepable_user_copy())
+ uprobe_multi_sleep_result++;
+ return uprobe_multi_check(ctx, bpf_session_is_return());
+}
--
2.47.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv9 bpf-next 07/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session cookie test
2024-11-08 13:45 [PATCHv9 bpf-next 00/13] bpf: Add uprobe session support Jiri Olsa
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 06/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session test Jiri Olsa
@ 2024-11-08 13:45 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 08/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session recursive test Jiri Olsa
` (6 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2024-11-08 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleg Nesterov, Peter Zijlstra, Alexei Starovoitov,
Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko
Cc: bpf, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, John Fastabend,
KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Steven Rostedt,
Masami Hiramatsu, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel
Adding uprobe session test that verifies the cookie value
get properly propagated from entry to return program.
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
.../bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c | 31 ++++++++++++
.../bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_cookie.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 79 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_cookie.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
index d9c20ca7a833..986852ec26f5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
#include "uprobe_multi_consumers.skel.h"
#include "uprobe_multi_pid_filter.skel.h"
#include "uprobe_multi_session.skel.h"
+#include "uprobe_multi_session_cookie.skel.h"
#include "bpf/libbpf_internal.h"
#include "testing_helpers.h"
#include "../sdt.h"
@@ -1062,6 +1063,34 @@ static void test_session_skel_api(void)
uprobe_multi_session__destroy(skel);
}
+static void test_session_cookie_skel_api(void)
+{
+ struct uprobe_multi_session_cookie *skel = NULL;
+ int err;
+
+ skel = uprobe_multi_session_cookie__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "uprobe_multi_session_cookie__open_and_load"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ skel->bss->pid = getpid();
+
+ err = uprobe_multi_session_cookie__attach(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "uprobe_multi_session_cookie__attach"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ /* trigger all probes */
+ uprobe_multi_func_1();
+ uprobe_multi_func_2();
+ uprobe_multi_func_3();
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_uprobe_1_result, 1, "test_uprobe_1_result");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_uprobe_2_result, 2, "test_uprobe_2_result");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_uprobe_3_result, 3, "test_uprobe_3_result");
+
+cleanup:
+ uprobe_multi_session_cookie__destroy(skel);
+}
+
static void test_bench_attach_uprobe(void)
{
long attach_start_ns = 0, attach_end_ns = 0;
@@ -1160,4 +1189,6 @@ void test_uprobe_multi_test(void)
test_pid_filter_process(true);
if (test__start_subtest("session"))
test_session_skel_api();
+ if (test__start_subtest("session_cookie"))
+ test_session_cookie_skel_api();
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_cookie.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_cookie.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..5befdf944dc6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_cookie.c
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include <stdbool.h>
+#include "bpf_kfuncs.h"
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+int pid = 0;
+
+__u64 test_uprobe_1_result = 0;
+__u64 test_uprobe_2_result = 0;
+__u64 test_uprobe_3_result = 0;
+
+static int check_cookie(__u64 val, __u64 *result)
+{
+ __u64 *cookie;
+
+ if (bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32 != pid)
+ return 1;
+
+ cookie = bpf_session_cookie();
+
+ if (bpf_session_is_return())
+ *result = *cookie == val ? val : 0;
+ else
+ *cookie = val;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("uprobe.session//proc/self/exe:uprobe_multi_func_1")
+int uprobe_1(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+ return check_cookie(1, &test_uprobe_1_result);
+}
+
+SEC("uprobe.session//proc/self/exe:uprobe_multi_func_2")
+int uprobe_2(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+ return check_cookie(2, &test_uprobe_2_result);
+}
+
+SEC("uprobe.session//proc/self/exe:uprobe_multi_func_3")
+int uprobe_3(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+ return check_cookie(3, &test_uprobe_3_result);
+}
--
2.47.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv9 bpf-next 08/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session recursive test
2024-11-08 13:45 [PATCHv9 bpf-next 00/13] bpf: Add uprobe session support Jiri Olsa
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 07/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session cookie test Jiri Olsa
@ 2024-11-08 13:45 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 09/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session verifier test for return value Jiri Olsa
` (5 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2024-11-08 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleg Nesterov, Peter Zijlstra, Alexei Starovoitov,
Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko
Cc: bpf, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, John Fastabend,
KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Steven Rostedt,
Masami Hiramatsu, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel
Adding uprobe session test that verifies the cookie value is stored
properly when single uprobe-ed function is executed recursively.
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
.../bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++
.../progs/uprobe_multi_session_recursive.c | 44 ++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 101 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_recursive.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
index 986852ec26f5..b9448fb63a19 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include "uprobe_multi_pid_filter.skel.h"
#include "uprobe_multi_session.skel.h"
#include "uprobe_multi_session_cookie.skel.h"
+#include "uprobe_multi_session_recursive.skel.h"
#include "bpf/libbpf_internal.h"
#include "testing_helpers.h"
#include "../sdt.h"
@@ -36,6 +37,12 @@ noinline void usdt_trigger(void)
STAP_PROBE(test, pid_filter_usdt);
}
+noinline void uprobe_session_recursive(int i)
+{
+ if (i)
+ uprobe_session_recursive(i - 1);
+}
+
struct child {
int go[2];
int c2p[2]; /* child -> parent channel */
@@ -1091,6 +1098,54 @@ static void test_session_cookie_skel_api(void)
uprobe_multi_session_cookie__destroy(skel);
}
+static void test_session_recursive_skel_api(void)
+{
+ struct uprobe_multi_session_recursive *skel = NULL;
+ int i, err;
+
+ skel = uprobe_multi_session_recursive__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "uprobe_multi_session_recursive__open_and_load"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ skel->bss->pid = getpid();
+
+ err = uprobe_multi_session_recursive__attach(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "uprobe_multi_session_recursive__attach"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(skel->bss->test_uprobe_cookie_entry); i++)
+ skel->bss->test_uprobe_cookie_entry[i] = i + 1;
+
+ uprobe_session_recursive(5);
+
+ /*
+ * entry uprobe:
+ * uprobe_session_recursive(5) { *cookie = 1, return 0
+ * uprobe_session_recursive(4) { *cookie = 2, return 1
+ * uprobe_session_recursive(3) { *cookie = 3, return 0
+ * uprobe_session_recursive(2) { *cookie = 4, return 1
+ * uprobe_session_recursive(1) { *cookie = 5, return 0
+ * uprobe_session_recursive(0) { *cookie = 6, return 1
+ * return uprobe:
+ * } i = 0 not executed
+ * } i = 1 test_uprobe_cookie_return[0] = 5
+ * } i = 2 not executed
+ * } i = 3 test_uprobe_cookie_return[1] = 3
+ * } i = 4 not executed
+ * } i = 5 test_uprobe_cookie_return[2] = 1
+ */
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->idx_entry, 6, "idx_entry");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->idx_return, 3, "idx_return");
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_uprobe_cookie_return[0], 5, "test_uprobe_cookie_return[0]");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_uprobe_cookie_return[1], 3, "test_uprobe_cookie_return[1]");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_uprobe_cookie_return[2], 1, "test_uprobe_cookie_return[2]");
+
+cleanup:
+ uprobe_multi_session_recursive__destroy(skel);
+}
+
static void test_bench_attach_uprobe(void)
{
long attach_start_ns = 0, attach_end_ns = 0;
@@ -1191,4 +1246,6 @@ void test_uprobe_multi_test(void)
test_session_skel_api();
if (test__start_subtest("session_cookie"))
test_session_cookie_skel_api();
+ if (test__start_subtest("session_cookie_recursive"))
+ test_session_recursive_skel_api();
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_recursive.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_recursive.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..8fbcd69fae22
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_recursive.c
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include <stdbool.h>
+#include "bpf_kfuncs.h"
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+int pid = 0;
+
+int idx_entry = 0;
+int idx_return = 0;
+
+__u64 test_uprobe_cookie_entry[6];
+__u64 test_uprobe_cookie_return[3];
+
+static int check_cookie(void)
+{
+ __u64 *cookie = bpf_session_cookie();
+
+ if (bpf_session_is_return()) {
+ if (idx_return >= ARRAY_SIZE(test_uprobe_cookie_return))
+ return 1;
+ test_uprobe_cookie_return[idx_return++] = *cookie;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (idx_entry >= ARRAY_SIZE(test_uprobe_cookie_entry))
+ return 1;
+ *cookie = test_uprobe_cookie_entry[idx_entry];
+ return idx_entry++ % 2;
+}
+
+
+SEC("uprobe.session//proc/self/exe:uprobe_session_recursive")
+int uprobe_recursive(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+ if (bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32 != pid)
+ return 1;
+
+ return check_cookie();
+}
--
2.47.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv9 bpf-next 09/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session verifier test for return value
2024-11-08 13:45 [PATCHv9 bpf-next 00/13] bpf: Add uprobe session support Jiri Olsa
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 08/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session recursive test Jiri Olsa
@ 2024-11-08 13:45 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 10/13] selftests/bpf: Add kprobe " Jiri Olsa
` (4 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2024-11-08 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleg Nesterov, Peter Zijlstra, Alexei Starovoitov,
Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko
Cc: bpf, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, John Fastabend,
KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Steven Rostedt,
Masami Hiramatsu, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel
Making sure uprobe.session program can return only [0,1] values.
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
.../bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c | 2 ++
.../bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_verifier.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_verifier.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
index b9448fb63a19..5dad31d1b606 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#include "uprobe_multi_session.skel.h"
#include "uprobe_multi_session_cookie.skel.h"
#include "uprobe_multi_session_recursive.skel.h"
+#include "uprobe_multi_verifier.skel.h"
#include "bpf/libbpf_internal.h"
#include "testing_helpers.h"
#include "../sdt.h"
@@ -1248,4 +1249,5 @@ void test_uprobe_multi_test(void)
test_session_cookie_skel_api();
if (test__start_subtest("session_cookie_recursive"))
test_session_recursive_skel_api();
+ RUN_TESTS(uprobe_multi_verifier);
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_verifier.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..fe49f2cb5360
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_verifier.c
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include <bpf/usdt.bpf.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+
+SEC("uprobe.session")
+__success
+int uprobe_sesison_return_0(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("uprobe.session")
+__success
+int uprobe_sesison_return_1(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("uprobe.session")
+__failure
+__msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=2 smax=2 should have been in [0, 1]")
+int uprobe_sesison_return_2(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+ return 2;
+}
--
2.47.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv9 bpf-next 10/13] selftests/bpf: Add kprobe session verifier test for return value
2024-11-08 13:45 [PATCHv9 bpf-next 00/13] bpf: Add uprobe session support Jiri Olsa
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 09/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session verifier test for return value Jiri Olsa
@ 2024-11-08 13:45 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 11/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session single consumer test Jiri Olsa
` (3 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2024-11-08 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleg Nesterov, Peter Zijlstra, Alexei Starovoitov,
Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko
Cc: bpf, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, John Fastabend,
KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Steven Rostedt,
Masami Hiramatsu, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel
Making sure kprobe.session program can return only [0,1] values.
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
.../bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c | 2 ++
.../bpf/progs/kprobe_multi_verifier.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_multi_verifier.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
index 960c9323d1e0..66ab1cae923e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#include "kprobe_multi_override.skel.h"
#include "kprobe_multi_session.skel.h"
#include "kprobe_multi_session_cookie.skel.h"
+#include "kprobe_multi_verifier.skel.h"
#include "bpf/libbpf_internal.h"
#include "bpf/hashmap.h"
@@ -764,4 +765,5 @@ void test_kprobe_multi_test(void)
test_session_skel_api();
if (test__start_subtest("session_cookie"))
test_session_cookie_skel_api();
+ RUN_TESTS(kprobe_multi_verifier);
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_multi_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_multi_verifier.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..288577e81deb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_multi_verifier.c
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include <bpf/usdt.bpf.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+
+SEC("kprobe.session")
+__success
+int kprobe_session_return_0(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("kprobe.session")
+__success
+int kprobe_session_return_1(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("kprobe.session")
+__failure
+__msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=2 smax=2 should have been in [0, 1]")
+int kprobe_session_return_2(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+ return 2;
+}
--
2.47.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv9 bpf-next 11/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session single consumer test
2024-11-08 13:45 [PATCHv9 bpf-next 00/13] bpf: Add uprobe session support Jiri Olsa
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 10/13] selftests/bpf: Add kprobe " Jiri Olsa
@ 2024-11-08 13:45 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 12/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe sessions to " Jiri Olsa
` (2 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2024-11-08 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleg Nesterov, Peter Zijlstra, Alexei Starovoitov,
Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko
Cc: bpf, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, John Fastabend,
KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Steven Rostedt,
Masami Hiramatsu, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel
Testing that the session ret_handler bypass works on single
uprobe with multiple consumers, each with different session
ignore return value.
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
.../bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c | 33 ++++++++++++++
.../bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_single.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 77 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_single.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
index 5dad31d1b606..93f5cabd6d01 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
#include "uprobe_multi_consumers.skel.h"
#include "uprobe_multi_pid_filter.skel.h"
#include "uprobe_multi_session.skel.h"
+#include "uprobe_multi_session_single.skel.h"
#include "uprobe_multi_session_cookie.skel.h"
#include "uprobe_multi_session_recursive.skel.h"
#include "uprobe_multi_verifier.skel.h"
@@ -1071,6 +1072,36 @@ static void test_session_skel_api(void)
uprobe_multi_session__destroy(skel);
}
+static void test_session_single_skel_api(void)
+{
+ struct uprobe_multi_session_single *skel = NULL;
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_kprobe_multi_opts, opts);
+ int err;
+
+ skel = uprobe_multi_session_single__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "uprobe_multi_session_single__open_and_load"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ skel->bss->pid = getpid();
+
+ err = uprobe_multi_session_single__attach(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "uprobe_multi_session_single__attach"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ uprobe_multi_func_1();
+
+ /*
+ * We expect consumer 0 and 2 to trigger just entry handler (value 1)
+ * and consumer 1 to hit both (value 2).
+ */
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->uprobe_session_result[0], 1, "uprobe_session_result_0");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->uprobe_session_result[1], 2, "uprobe_session_result_1");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->uprobe_session_result[2], 1, "uprobe_session_result_2");
+
+cleanup:
+ uprobe_multi_session_single__destroy(skel);
+}
+
static void test_session_cookie_skel_api(void)
{
struct uprobe_multi_session_cookie *skel = NULL;
@@ -1245,6 +1276,8 @@ void test_uprobe_multi_test(void)
test_pid_filter_process(true);
if (test__start_subtest("session"))
test_session_skel_api();
+ if (test__start_subtest("session_single"))
+ test_session_single_skel_api();
if (test__start_subtest("session_cookie"))
test_session_cookie_skel_api();
if (test__start_subtest("session_cookie_recursive"))
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_single.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_single.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..7c960376ae97
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_single.c
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include <stdbool.h>
+#include "bpf_kfuncs.h"
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+__u64 uprobe_session_result[3] = {};
+int pid = 0;
+
+static int uprobe_multi_check(void *ctx, int idx)
+{
+ if (bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32 != pid)
+ return 1;
+
+ uprobe_session_result[idx]++;
+
+ /* only consumer 1 executes return probe */
+ if (idx == 0 || idx == 2)
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("uprobe.session//proc/self/exe:uprobe_multi_func_1")
+int uprobe_0(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+ return uprobe_multi_check(ctx, 0);
+}
+
+SEC("uprobe.session//proc/self/exe:uprobe_multi_func_1")
+int uprobe_1(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+ return uprobe_multi_check(ctx, 1);
+}
+
+SEC("uprobe.session//proc/self/exe:uprobe_multi_func_1")
+int uprobe_2(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+ return uprobe_multi_check(ctx, 2);
+}
--
2.47.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv9 bpf-next 12/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe sessions to consumer test
2024-11-08 13:45 [PATCHv9 bpf-next 00/13] bpf: Add uprobe session support Jiri Olsa
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 11/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session single consumer test Jiri Olsa
@ 2024-11-08 13:45 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 13/13] selftests/bpf: Add threads " Jiri Olsa
2024-11-08 18:40 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 00/13] bpf: Add uprobe session support patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2024-11-08 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleg Nesterov, Peter Zijlstra, Alexei Starovoitov,
Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko
Cc: bpf, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, John Fastabend,
KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Steven Rostedt,
Masami Hiramatsu, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel
Adding uprobe session consumers to the consumer test,
so we get the session into the test mix.
In addition scaling down the test to have just 1 uprobe
and 1 uretprobe, otherwise the test time grows and is
unsuitable for CI even with threads.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
.../bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c | 70 +++++++++++++------
.../bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_consumers.c | 6 +-
2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
index 93f5cabd6d01..0a31ba2d6fb2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
@@ -799,10 +799,13 @@ static int uprobe_attach(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel, int idx)
return -1;
/*
- * bit/prog: 0,1 uprobe entry
- * bit/prog: 2,3 uprobe return
+ * bit/prog: 0 uprobe entry
+ * bit/prog: 1 uprobe return
+ * bit/prog: 2 uprobe session without return
+ * bit/prog: 3 uprobe session with return
*/
- opts.retprobe = idx == 2 || idx == 3;
+ opts.retprobe = idx == 1;
+ opts.session = idx == 2 || idx == 3;
*link = bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi(prog, 0, "/proc/self/exe",
"uprobe_consumer_test",
@@ -867,31 +870,55 @@ static int consumer_test(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel,
goto cleanup;
for (idx = 0; idx < 4; idx++) {
+ bool uret_stays, uret_survives;
const char *fmt = "BUG";
__u64 val = 0;
- if (idx < 2) {
+ switch (idx) {
+ case 0:
/*
* uprobe entry
* +1 if define in 'before'
*/
if (test_bit(idx, before))
val++;
- fmt = "prog 0/1: uprobe";
- } else {
+ fmt = "prog 0: uprobe";
+ break;
+ case 1:
/*
* To trigger uretprobe consumer, the uretprobe under test either stayed from
* before to after (uret_stays + test_bit) or uretprobe instance survived and
* we have uretprobe active in after (uret_survives + test_bit)
*/
-
- bool uret_stays = before & after & 0b1100;
- bool uret_survives = (before & 0b1100) && (after & 0b1100) && (before & 0b0011);
+ uret_stays = before & after & 0b0110;
+ uret_survives = ((before & 0b0110) && (after & 0b0110) && (before & 0b1001));
if ((uret_stays || uret_survives) && test_bit(idx, after))
val++;
-
- fmt = "idx 2/3: uretprobe";
+ fmt = "prog 1: uretprobe";
+ break;
+ case 2:
+ /*
+ * session with return
+ * +1 if defined in 'before'
+ * +1 if defined in 'after'
+ */
+ if (test_bit(idx, before)) {
+ val++;
+ if (test_bit(idx, after))
+ val++;
+ }
+ fmt = "prog 2: session with return";
+ break;
+ case 3:
+ /*
+ * session without return
+ * +1 if defined in 'before'
+ */
+ if (test_bit(idx, before))
+ val++;
+ fmt = "prog 3: session with NO return";
+ break;
}
if (!ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->uprobe_result[idx], val, fmt))
@@ -920,8 +947,10 @@ static void test_consumers(void)
* The idea of this test is to try all possible combinations of
* uprobes consumers attached on single function.
*
- * - 2 uprobe entry consumer
- * - 2 uprobe exit consumers
+ * - 1 uprobe entry consumer
+ * - 1 uprobe exit consumer
+ * - 1 uprobe session with return
+ * - 1 uprobe session without return
*
* The test uses 4 uprobes attached on single function, but that
* translates into single uprobe with 4 consumers in kernel.
@@ -929,25 +958,24 @@ static void test_consumers(void)
* The before/after values present the state of attached consumers
* before and after the probed function:
*
- * bit/prog 0,1 : uprobe entry
- * bit/prog 2,3 : uprobe return
+ * bit/prog 0 : uprobe entry
+ * bit/prog 1 : uprobe return
*
* For example for:
*
- * before = 0b0101
- * after = 0b0110
+ * before = 0b01
+ * after = 0b10
*
* it means that before we call 'uprobe_consumer_test' we attach
* uprobes defined in 'before' value:
*
- * - bit/prog 0: uprobe entry
- * - bit/prog 2: uprobe return
+ * - bit/prog 1: uprobe entry
*
* uprobe_consumer_test is called and inside it we attach and detach
* uprobes based on 'after' value:
*
- * - bit/prog 0: stays untouched
- * - bit/prog 2: uprobe return is detached
+ * - bit/prog 0: is detached
+ * - bit/prog 1: is attached
*
* uprobe_consumer_test returns and we check counters values increased
* by bpf programs on each uprobe to match the expected count based on
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_consumers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_consumers.c
index 7e0fdcbbd242..93752bb5690b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_consumers.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_consumers.c
@@ -24,16 +24,16 @@ int uprobe_1(struct pt_regs *ctx)
return 0;
}
-SEC("uprobe.multi")
+SEC("uprobe.session")
int uprobe_2(struct pt_regs *ctx)
{
uprobe_result[2]++;
return 0;
}
-SEC("uprobe.multi")
+SEC("uprobe.session")
int uprobe_3(struct pt_regs *ctx)
{
uprobe_result[3]++;
- return 0;
+ return 1;
}
--
2.47.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv9 bpf-next 13/13] selftests/bpf: Add threads to consumer test
2024-11-08 13:45 [PATCHv9 bpf-next 00/13] bpf: Add uprobe session support Jiri Olsa
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 12/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe sessions to " Jiri Olsa
@ 2024-11-08 13:45 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-11-08 18:40 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 00/13] bpf: Add uprobe session support patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2024-11-08 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleg Nesterov, Peter Zijlstra, Alexei Starovoitov,
Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko
Cc: bpf, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, John Fastabend,
KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Steven Rostedt,
Masami Hiramatsu, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel
With recent uprobe fix [1] the sync time after unregistering uprobe is
much longer and prolongs the consumer test which creates and destroys
hundreds of uprobes.
This change adds 16 threads (which fits the test logic) and speeds up
the test.
Before the change:
# perf stat --null ./test_progs -t uprobe_multi_test/consumers
#421/9 uprobe_multi_test/consumers:OK
#421 uprobe_multi_test:OK
Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Performance counter stats for './test_progs -t uprobe_multi_test/consumers':
28.818778973 seconds time elapsed
0.745518000 seconds user
0.919186000 seconds sys
After the change:
# perf stat --null ./test_progs -t uprobe_multi_test/consumers 2>&1
#421/9 uprobe_multi_test/consumers:OK
#421 uprobe_multi_test:OK
Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Performance counter stats for './test_progs -t uprobe_multi_test/consumers':
3.504790814 seconds time elapsed
0.012141000 seconds user
0.751760000 seconds sys
[1] commit 87195a1ee332 ("uprobes: switch to RCU Tasks Trace flavor for better performance")
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
.../bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c | 98 +++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 80 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
index 0a31ba2d6fb2..2ee17ef1dae2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
@@ -789,7 +789,7 @@ get_link(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel, int link)
}
}
-static int uprobe_attach(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel, int idx)
+static int uprobe_attach(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel, int idx, unsigned long offset)
{
struct bpf_program *prog = get_program(skel, idx);
struct bpf_link **link = get_link(skel, idx);
@@ -798,6 +798,9 @@ static int uprobe_attach(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel, int idx)
if (!prog || !link)
return -1;
+ opts.offsets = &offset;
+ opts.cnt = 1;
+
/*
* bit/prog: 0 uprobe entry
* bit/prog: 1 uprobe return
@@ -807,9 +810,7 @@ static int uprobe_attach(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel, int idx)
opts.retprobe = idx == 1;
opts.session = idx == 2 || idx == 3;
- *link = bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi(prog, 0, "/proc/self/exe",
- "uprobe_consumer_test",
- &opts);
+ *link = bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi(prog, 0, "/proc/self/exe", NULL, &opts);
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(*link, "bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi"))
return -1;
return 0;
@@ -830,7 +831,8 @@ static bool test_bit(int bit, unsigned long val)
noinline int
uprobe_consumer_test(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel,
- unsigned long before, unsigned long after)
+ unsigned long before, unsigned long after,
+ unsigned long offset)
{
int idx;
@@ -843,15 +845,43 @@ uprobe_consumer_test(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel,
/* ... and attach all new programs in 'after' state */
for (idx = 0; idx < 4; idx++) {
if (!test_bit(idx, before) && test_bit(idx, after)) {
- if (!ASSERT_OK(uprobe_attach(skel, idx), "uprobe_attach_after"))
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(uprobe_attach(skel, idx, offset), "uprobe_attach_after"))
return -1;
}
}
return 0;
}
+/*
+ * We generate 16 consumer_testX functions that will have uprobe installed on
+ * and will be called in separate threads. All function pointer are stored in
+ * "consumers" section and each thread will pick one function based on index.
+ */
+
+extern const void *__start_consumers;
+
+#define __CONSUMER_TEST(func) \
+noinline int func(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel, unsigned long before, \
+ unsigned long after, unsigned long offset) \
+{ \
+ return uprobe_consumer_test(skel, before, after, offset); \
+} \
+void *__ ## func __used __attribute__((section("consumers"))) = (void *) func;
+
+#define CONSUMER_TEST(func) __CONSUMER_TEST(func)
+
+#define C1 CONSUMER_TEST(__PASTE(consumer_test, __COUNTER__))
+#define C4 C1 C1 C1 C1
+#define C16 C4 C4 C4 C4
+
+C16
+
+typedef int (*test_t)(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *, unsigned long,
+ unsigned long, unsigned long);
+
static int consumer_test(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel,
- unsigned long before, unsigned long after)
+ unsigned long before, unsigned long after,
+ test_t test, unsigned long offset)
{
int err, idx, ret = -1;
@@ -860,12 +890,12 @@ static int consumer_test(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel,
/* 'before' is each, we attach uprobe for every set idx */
for (idx = 0; idx < 4; idx++) {
if (test_bit(idx, before)) {
- if (!ASSERT_OK(uprobe_attach(skel, idx), "uprobe_attach_before"))
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(uprobe_attach(skel, idx, offset), "uprobe_attach_before"))
goto cleanup;
}
}
- err = uprobe_consumer_test(skel, before, after);
+ err = test(skel, before, after, offset);
if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "uprobe_consumer_test"))
goto cleanup;
@@ -934,14 +964,46 @@ static int consumer_test(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel,
return ret;
}
-static void test_consumers(void)
+#define CONSUMER_MAX 16
+
+/*
+ * Each thread runs 1/16 of the load by running test for single
+ * 'before' number (based on thread index) and full scale of
+ * 'after' numbers.
+ */
+static void *consumer_thread(void *arg)
{
+ unsigned long idx = (unsigned long) arg;
struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel;
- int before, after;
+ unsigned long offset;
+ const void *func;
+ int after;
skel = uprobe_multi_consumers__open_and_load();
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "uprobe_multi_consumers__open_and_load"))
- return;
+ return NULL;
+
+ func = *((&__start_consumers) + idx);
+
+ offset = get_uprobe_offset(func);
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(offset, 0, "uprobe_offset"))
+ goto out;
+
+ for (after = 0; after < CONSUMER_MAX; after++)
+ if (consumer_test(skel, idx, after, func, offset))
+ goto out;
+
+out:
+ uprobe_multi_consumers__destroy(skel);
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+
+static void test_consumers(void)
+{
+ pthread_t pt[CONSUMER_MAX];
+ unsigned long idx;
+ int err;
/*
* The idea of this test is to try all possible combinations of
@@ -982,14 +1044,14 @@ static void test_consumers(void)
* before/after bits.
*/
- for (before = 0; before < 16; before++) {
- for (after = 0; after < 16; after++)
- if (consumer_test(skel, before, after))
- goto out;
+ for (idx = 0; idx < CONSUMER_MAX; idx++) {
+ err = pthread_create(&pt[idx], NULL, consumer_thread, (void *) idx);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "pthread_create"))
+ break;
}
-out:
- uprobe_multi_consumers__destroy(skel);
+ while (idx)
+ pthread_join(pt[--idx], NULL);
}
static struct bpf_program *uprobe_multi_program(struct uprobe_multi_pid_filter *skel, int idx)
--
2.47.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHv9 bpf-next 00/13] bpf: Add uprobe session support
2024-11-08 13:45 [PATCHv9 bpf-next 00/13] bpf: Add uprobe session support Jiri Olsa
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 13/13] selftests/bpf: Add threads " Jiri Olsa
@ 2024-11-08 18:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2024-11-08 18:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiri Olsa
Cc: oleg, peterz, ast, daniel, andrii, bpf, kafai, songliubraving,
yhs, john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, rostedt, mhiramat,
linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 14:45:31 +0100 you wrote:
> hi,
> this patchset is adding support for session uprobe attachment and
> using it through bpf link for bpf programs.
>
> The session means that the uprobe consumer is executed on entry
> and return of probed function with additional control:
> - entry callback can control execution of the return callback
> - entry and return callbacks can share data/cookie
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [PATCHv9,bpf-next,01/13] bpf: Allow return values 0 and 1 for kprobe session
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/1c9b65d7b569
- [PATCHv9,bpf-next,02/13] bpf: Force uprobe bpf program to always return 0
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/fb9618060bb7
- [PATCHv9,bpf-next,03/13] bpf: Add support for uprobe multi session attach
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/4c2c20b698ce
- [PATCHv9,bpf-next,04/13] bpf: Add support for uprobe multi session context
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/362ced90a9b9
- [PATCHv9,bpf-next,05/13] libbpf: Add support for uprobe multi session attach
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/894d0bd715f8
- [PATCHv9,bpf-next,06/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session test
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/1932f3ffe604
- [PATCHv9,bpf-next,07/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session cookie test
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/dce1b3b721b8
- [PATCHv9,bpf-next,08/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session recursive test
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/9236020b0896
- [PATCHv9,bpf-next,09/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session verifier test for return value
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/a773e1d169db
- [PATCHv9,bpf-next,10/13] selftests/bpf: Add kprobe session verifier test for return value
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/7dd198ccbe43
- [PATCHv9,bpf-next,11/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session single consumer test
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/beab56332941
- [PATCHv9,bpf-next,12/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe sessions to consumer test
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/f343d91be2cb
- [PATCHv9,bpf-next,13/13] selftests/bpf: Add threads to consumer test
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/90aac4610851
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHv9 bpf-next 05/13] libbpf: Add support for uprobe multi session attach
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 05/13] libbpf: Add support for uprobe multi session attach Jiri Olsa
@ 2024-11-15 3:59 ` Andrii Nakryiko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2024-11-15 3:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiri Olsa
Cc: Oleg Nesterov, Peter Zijlstra, Alexei Starovoitov,
Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko, bpf, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu,
Yonghong Song, John Fastabend, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev,
Hao Luo, Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu, linux-kernel,
linux-trace-kernel
On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 5:47 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Adding support to attach program in uprobe session mode
> with bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi function.
>
> Adding session bool to bpf_uprobe_multi_opts struct that allows
> to load and attach the bpf program via uprobe session.
> the attachment to create uprobe multi session.
>
> Also adding new program loader section that allows:
> SEC("uprobe.session/bpf_fentry_test*")
>
> and loads/attaches uprobe program as uprobe session.
>
> Adding sleepable hook (uprobe.session.s) as well.
>
> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c | 1 +
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 4 +++-
> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
> index 2a4c71501a17..becdfa701c75 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
> @@ -776,6 +776,7 @@ int bpf_link_create(int prog_fd, int target_fd,
> return libbpf_err(-EINVAL);
> break;
> case BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI:
> + case BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION:
> attr.link_create.uprobe_multi.flags = OPTS_GET(opts, uprobe_multi.flags, 0);
> attr.link_create.uprobe_multi.cnt = OPTS_GET(opts, uprobe_multi.cnt, 0);
> attr.link_create.uprobe_multi.path = ptr_to_u64(OPTS_GET(opts, uprobe_multi.path, 0));
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index faac1c79840d..a2bc5bea7ea3 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -9442,8 +9442,10 @@ static const struct bpf_sec_def section_defs[] = {
> SEC_DEF("kprobe.session+", KPROBE, BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_SESSION, SEC_NONE, attach_kprobe_session),
> SEC_DEF("uprobe.multi+", KPROBE, BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI, SEC_NONE, attach_uprobe_multi),
> SEC_DEF("uretprobe.multi+", KPROBE, BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI, SEC_NONE, attach_uprobe_multi),
> + SEC_DEF("uprobe.session+", KPROBE, BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION, SEC_NONE, attach_uprobe_multi),
> SEC_DEF("uprobe.multi.s+", KPROBE, BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI, SEC_SLEEPABLE, attach_uprobe_multi),
> SEC_DEF("uretprobe.multi.s+", KPROBE, BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI, SEC_SLEEPABLE, attach_uprobe_multi),
> + SEC_DEF("uprobe.session.s+", KPROBE, BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION, SEC_SLEEPABLE, attach_uprobe_multi),
> SEC_DEF("ksyscall+", KPROBE, 0, SEC_NONE, attach_ksyscall),
> SEC_DEF("kretsyscall+", KPROBE, 0, SEC_NONE, attach_ksyscall),
> SEC_DEF("usdt+", KPROBE, 0, SEC_USDT, attach_usdt),
> @@ -11765,7 +11767,9 @@ static int attach_uprobe_multi(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie, stru
> ret = 0;
> break;
> case 3:
> + opts.session = str_has_pfx(probe_type, "uprobe.session");
> opts.retprobe = str_has_pfx(probe_type, "uretprobe.multi");
> +
> *link = bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi(prog, -1, binary_path, func_name, &opts);
> ret = libbpf_get_error(*link);
> break;
> @@ -12014,10 +12018,12 @@ bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi(const struct bpf_program *prog,
> const unsigned long *ref_ctr_offsets = NULL, *offsets = NULL;
> LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_link_create_opts, lopts);
> unsigned long *resolved_offsets = NULL;
> + enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
> int err = 0, link_fd, prog_fd;
> struct bpf_link *link = NULL;
> char errmsg[STRERR_BUFSIZE];
> char full_path[PATH_MAX];
> + bool retprobe, session;
> const __u64 *cookies;
> const char **syms;
> size_t cnt;
> @@ -12088,12 +12094,20 @@ bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi(const struct bpf_program *prog,
> offsets = resolved_offsets;
> }
>
> + retprobe = OPTS_GET(opts, retprobe, false);
> + session = OPTS_GET(opts, session, false);
> +
> + if (retprobe && session)
> + return libbpf_err_ptr(-EINVAL);
Hey Jiri,
Coverity says that we are leaking offsets (resolved_offsets) here.
Please send a fix, thanks.
> +
> + attach_type = session ? BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION : BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI;
> +
> lopts.uprobe_multi.path = path;
> lopts.uprobe_multi.offsets = offsets;
> lopts.uprobe_multi.ref_ctr_offsets = ref_ctr_offsets;
> lopts.uprobe_multi.cookies = cookies;
> lopts.uprobe_multi.cnt = cnt;
> - lopts.uprobe_multi.flags = OPTS_GET(opts, retprobe, false) ? BPF_F_UPROBE_MULTI_RETURN : 0;
> + lopts.uprobe_multi.flags = retprobe ? BPF_F_UPROBE_MULTI_RETURN : 0;
>
> if (pid == 0)
> pid = getpid();
> @@ -12107,7 +12121,7 @@ bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi(const struct bpf_program *prog,
> }
> link->detach = &bpf_link__detach_fd;
>
> - link_fd = bpf_link_create(prog_fd, 0, BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI, &lopts);
> + link_fd = bpf_link_create(prog_fd, 0, attach_type, &lopts);
> if (link_fd < 0) {
> err = -errno;
> pr_warn("prog '%s': failed to attach multi-uprobe: %s\n",
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> index 91484303849c..b2ce3a72b11d 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> @@ -577,10 +577,12 @@ struct bpf_uprobe_multi_opts {
> size_t cnt;
> /* create return uprobes */
> bool retprobe;
> + /* create session kprobes */
> + bool session;
> size_t :0;
> };
>
> -#define bpf_uprobe_multi_opts__last_field retprobe
> +#define bpf_uprobe_multi_opts__last_field session
>
> /**
> * @brief **bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi()** attaches a BPF program
> --
> 2.47.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-11-15 4:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-11-08 13:45 [PATCHv9 bpf-next 00/13] bpf: Add uprobe session support Jiri Olsa
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 01/13] bpf: Allow return values 0 and 1 for kprobe session Jiri Olsa
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 02/13] bpf: Force uprobe bpf program to always return 0 Jiri Olsa
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 03/13] bpf: Add support for uprobe multi session attach Jiri Olsa
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 04/13] bpf: Add support for uprobe multi session context Jiri Olsa
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 05/13] libbpf: Add support for uprobe multi session attach Jiri Olsa
2024-11-15 3:59 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 06/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session test Jiri Olsa
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 07/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session cookie test Jiri Olsa
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 08/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session recursive test Jiri Olsa
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 09/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session verifier test for return value Jiri Olsa
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 10/13] selftests/bpf: Add kprobe " Jiri Olsa
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 11/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session single consumer test Jiri Olsa
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 12/13] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe sessions to " Jiri Olsa
2024-11-08 13:45 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 13/13] selftests/bpf: Add threads " Jiri Olsa
2024-11-08 18:40 ` [PATCHv9 bpf-next 00/13] bpf: Add uprobe session support patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).