From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6D471F543E; Fri, 6 Dec 2024 09:36:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.156.1 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733477783; cv=none; b=P3m2T2XwxbzJCtWx5FuBscnv1kpPdRdTdChvmyKshLRTxj/F4QyTfmgsevUpOXlBO5fd015DdgM+QeCDKG8JF5JUmO4KHjyo3yK17iccpKMSloGHUQTtXqIaf5K+Qh5s1uqayt3zmDP7C6TLbsY7Pu+no8amFqdPtN6jNDu3R1I= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733477783; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qgUDk+W+PIyTOGoAKRTvzyiV3ijeNBD1N4UTpLpjEhI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=C7wrOPjsDnvA1ZCULK1MOWFkPFU4qL25AYPgk4pXG+tn7KOm5uIuxECD6gD7dxCh3MXcednCKdBPHimaVQoC0RNIPXZZ+BlV2W+EmCByHMTohJN/Sqc1pAHkgsS7CyxwTGr8K6UYyp+wMBKIqpq1tebwdSlyUJoXg4/fljmu2zo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b=mzxnsOij; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.156.1 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="mzxnsOij" Received: from pps.filterd (m0353729.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 4B67REtR028543; Fri, 6 Dec 2024 09:36:02 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=cc :content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to; s=pp1; bh=N8fRNsyI6v+DciPAXUcifEKU55GUAY Uh9TWGHulSCA4=; b=mzxnsOijoF3t/+ZDnyTbeT4uobmZhBxF6WLdSxpovKCOld JF/pwh2gPFTOSCeyNdZCOtpVgZVIfh6FWNv4XWMXAm09BnuNt4s1nhlsJAaZDAy8 51NkQL774mlUpqYmB4BQcv2Hp2j/kSWKkce4/k6ZJTA7h0I2nJlYx5ysm4BKReLU /XxpxFzs8t6EEVVaWA03syUflVtgJoueypCQrBkvxGePQdYi7uKKTZSK6ZdRPd0C +awDussSrEPRaF0H35giGoJ53ghLRujtwVQx/UlJPstxM4fS9Q9xRUwLInxf4j76 IDt813vVM1sho8XrmmYa3xsV0qnPtlHnXxz2bJpA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 43ax661745-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 06 Dec 2024 09:36:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from m0353729.ppops.net (m0353729.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.18.0.8/8.18.0.8) with ESMTP id 4B69RYVs008431; Fri, 6 Dec 2024 09:36:01 GMT Received: from ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (dd.9e.1632.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [50.22.158.221]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 43ax661741-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 06 Dec 2024 09:36:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 4B69XLoA006840; Fri, 6 Dec 2024 09:36:00 GMT Received: from smtprelay01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.227]) by ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 438f8jwxr1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 06 Dec 2024 09:36:00 +0000 Received: from smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.103]) by smtprelay01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 4B69ZxtV52625736 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 6 Dec 2024 09:35:59 GMT Received: from smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 153EF2004B; Fri, 6 Dec 2024 09:35:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5049920043; Fri, 6 Dec 2024 09:35:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from osiris (unknown [9.171.17.195]) by smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 6 Dec 2024 09:35:58 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 10:35:56 +0100 From: Heiko Carstens To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Steven Rostedt , Florent Revest , linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Martin KaFai Lau , bpf , Alexei Starovoitov , Jiri Olsa , Alan Maguire , Mark Rutland , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 00/19] tracing: fprobe: function_graph: Multi-function graph and fprobe on fgraph Message-ID: <20241206093556.9026-B-hca@linux.ibm.com> References: <173344373580.50709.5332611753907139634.stgit@devnote2> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <173344373580.50709.5332611753907139634.stgit@devnote2> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: -lHs55unlvg6qIyZj6aDfrYW0-N2M25V X-Proofpoint-GUID: qUwWR2oi7s5dOJ7jHDw_vlUQLLNjoFPe X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1051,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.62.30 definitions=2024-10-15_01,2024-10-11_01,2024-09-30_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=415 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2411120000 definitions=main-2412060068 On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 09:08:56AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote: > Hi, > > Here is the 20th version of the series to re-implement the fprobe on > function-graph tracer. The previous version is; > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/173125372214.172790.6929368952404083802.stgit@devnote2/ > > This version is rebased on v6.13-rc1 and fixes to make CONFIG_FPROBE > "n" by default, so that it does not enable function graph tracer by > default. Is there a reason why you didn't add the ACKs I provided for s390 related patches for v19 of this series?