From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
luto@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
hpa@zytor.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
willy@infradead.org, mgorman@suse.de, jon.grimm@amd.com,
bharata@amd.com, raghavendra.kt@amd.com,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
jgross@suse.com, Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com,
Vineeth Pillai <vineethrp@google.com>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Clark Williams <clark.williams@gmail.com>,
daniel.wagner@suse.com,
Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@oracle.com>,
broonie@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] sched: Extended scheduler time slice
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 09:20:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250206092041.3fe52ff5@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250206135744.GQ7145@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:57:44 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> Right, but so what? Same delay will happen if interrupt fires in the
> middle of a preempt_disable() region.
>
> Or if interrupt gets pending while interrupts are disabled, except your
> trace will not show that.
>
> Your worst case response time isn't affected. That's all that matters.
So now if a task has this set, and an interrupt goes off and wakes an RT
task, not only is the time of the interrupt the latency of the RT task, but
also this extension of the SCHED_OTHER task.
That is, where it use to be:
event RT task scheduled
| |
v v
time: |-------+-+----+--
^
|
interrupt
If the interrupt triggered just as the task set this bit, we then have:
event set Xus RT task scheduled
| | |
v v v
time: |-------+-+----+-------+--+
^ ^
| |
interrupt Xus timer triggered
This adds on *top* of the current latency, and is not just by itself.
Yes, this may not happen often, but in RT we very much do care about the
worst case scenarios. (That's the difference between an RT project and a
project that just uses RT).
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-06 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <EC77D83D-DD17-4CCD-9EF6-C4C39FCE16E7@oracle.com>
2025-02-05 0:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] sched: Extended scheduler time slice Joel Fernandes
2025-02-05 3:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-02-05 5:09 ` Joel Fernandes
2025-02-05 13:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-02-05 13:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-02-05 21:08 ` Prakash Sangappa
2025-02-05 21:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-02-05 21:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-02-06 3:07 ` Joel Fernandes
2025-02-06 13:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-02-06 13:44 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-06 13:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-06 13:53 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-06 13:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-06 14:20 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2025-02-06 14:22 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-06 14:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-06 14:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-02-06 15:01 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-10 19:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-02-10 22:04 ` David Laight
2025-02-10 22:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-02-11 8:21 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-11 10:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-11 15:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-02-12 12:11 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-12 15:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-02-12 15:18 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-10 14:07 ` Joel Fernandes
2025-02-10 19:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-02-10 17:20 ` David Laight
2025-02-10 17:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-02-10 19:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-02-10 21:51 ` David Laight
2025-02-10 21:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-01-31 22:58 [RFC][PATCH 0/2] sched: Extended Scheduler Time Slice revisited Steven Rostedt
2025-01-31 22:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] sched: Extended scheduler time slice Steven Rostedt
2025-02-01 11:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-01 12:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-02-01 18:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-01 23:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-02-03 8:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-03 8:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-03 16:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-02-04 3:28 ` Suleiman Souhlal
2025-02-04 3:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-02-04 9:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-04 12:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-02-04 13:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-02-04 15:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-02-04 15:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-04 16:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-02-05 9:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-05 13:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-02-05 13:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-02-01 14:35 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-02-01 23:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-02-01 23:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-02-01 23:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-02-02 3:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-02-02 3:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-02-02 7:22 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-02-02 22:29 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250206092041.3fe52ff5@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
--cc=bharata@amd.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=broonie@gmail.com \
--cc=clark.williams@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.wagner@suse.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=jon.grimm@amd.com \
--cc=joseph.salisbury@oracle.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=prakash.sangappa@oracle.com \
--cc=raghavendra.kt@amd.com \
--cc=suleiman@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vineethrp@google.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).