linux-trace-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] fprobe: Always unregister fgraph function from ops
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 17:04:39 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250219220511.227410168@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20250219220436.498041541@goodmis.org

From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

When the last fprobe is removed, it calls unregister_ftrace_graph() to
remove the graph_ops from function graph. The issue is when it does so, it
calls return before removing the function from its graph ops via
ftrace_set_filter_ips(). This leaves the last function lingering in the
fprobe's fgraph ops and if a probe is added it also enables that last
function (even though the callback will just drop it, it does add unneeded
overhead to make that call).

  # echo "f:myevent1 kernel_clone" >> /sys/kernel/tracing/dynamic_events
  # cat /sys/kernel/tracing/enabled_functions
kernel_clone (1)           	tramp: 0xffffffffc02f3000 (ftrace_graph_func+0x0/0x60) ->ftrace_graph_func+0x0/0x60

  # echo "f:myevent2 schedule_timeout" >> /sys/kernel/tracing/dynamic_events
  # cat /sys/kernel/tracing/enabled_functions
kernel_clone (1)           	tramp: 0xffffffffc02f3000 (ftrace_graph_func+0x0/0x60) ->ftrace_graph_func+0x0/0x60
schedule_timeout (1)           	tramp: 0xffffffffc02f3000 (ftrace_graph_func+0x0/0x60) ->ftrace_graph_func+0x0/0x60

  # > /sys/kernel/tracing/dynamic_events
  # cat /sys/kernel/tracing/enabled_functions

  # echo "f:myevent3 kmem_cache_free" >> /sys/kernel/tracing/dynamic_events
  # cat /sys/kernel/tracing/enabled_functions
kmem_cache_free (1)           	tramp: 0xffffffffc0219000 (ftrace_graph_func+0x0/0x60) ->ftrace_graph_func+0x0/0x60
schedule_timeout (1)           	tramp: 0xffffffffc0219000 (ftrace_graph_func+0x0/0x60) ->ftrace_graph_func+0x0/0x60

The above enabled a fprobe on kernel_clone, and then on schedule_timeout.
The content of the enabled_functions shows the functions that have a
callback attached to them. The fprobe attached to those functions
properly. Then the fprobes were cleared, and enabled_functions was empty
after that. But after adding a fprobe on kmem_cache_free, the
enabled_functions shows that the schedule_timeout was attached again. This
is because it was still left in the fprobe ops that is used to tell
function graph what functions it wants callbacks from.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 4346ba1604093 ("fprobe: Rewrite fprobe on function-graph tracer")
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 kernel/trace/fprobe.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/fprobe.c b/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
index 2560b312ad57..62e8f7d56602 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
@@ -403,11 +403,9 @@ static void fprobe_graph_remove_ips(unsigned long *addrs, int num)
 	lockdep_assert_held(&fprobe_mutex);
 
 	fprobe_graph_active--;
-	if (!fprobe_graph_active) {
-		/* Q: should we unregister it ? */
+	/* Q: should we unregister it ? */
+	if (!fprobe_graph_active)
 		unregister_ftrace_graph(&fprobe_graph_ops);
-		return;
-	}
 
 	ftrace_set_filter_ips(&fprobe_graph_ops.ops, addrs, num, 1, 0);
 }
-- 
2.47.2



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-19 22:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-19 22:04 [PATCH v2 0/5] ftrace: Fix fprobe with function graph accounting Steven Rostedt
2025-02-19 22:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] ftrace: Fix accounting of adding subops to a manager ops Steven Rostedt
2025-02-20  6:58   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-02-20 20:06     ` Steven Rostedt
2025-02-19 22:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] ftrace: Do not add duplicate entries in subops " Steven Rostedt
2025-02-20  6:59   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-02-19 22:04 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2025-02-20  4:41   ` [PATCH v2 3/5] fprobe: Always unregister fgraph function from ops Masami Hiramatsu
2025-02-19 22:04 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] fprobe: Fix accounting of when to unregister from function graph Steven Rostedt
2025-02-20  4:42   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-02-19 22:04 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] selftests/ftrace: Update fprobe test to check enabled_functions file Steven Rostedt
2025-02-20 11:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] ftrace: Fix fprobe with function graph accounting Heiko Carstens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250219220511.227410168@goodmis.org \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).