public inbox for linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: probe-events: Add comments about entry data storing code
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 17:47:12 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250228174712.44e03694@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <174061715004.501424.333819546601401102.stgit@devnote2>

On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 09:45:50 +0900
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:

> From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> 
> Add comments about entry data storing code to __store_entry_arg() and
> traceprobe_get_entry_data_size(). These are a bit complicated because of
> building the entry data storing code and scanning it.
> 
> This just add comments, no behavior change.
> 
> Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250226102223.586d7119@gandalf.local.home/
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> ---
>  kernel/trace/trace_probe.c |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
> index 8f58ee1e8858..2eeecb6c95ee 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
> @@ -770,6 +770,10 @@ static int check_prepare_btf_string_fetch(char *typename,
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_FUNCTION_ARG_ACCESS_API
>  
> +/*
> + * Add the entry code to store the 'argnum'th parameter and return the offset
> + * in the entry data buffer where the data will be stored.
> + */
>  static int __store_entry_arg(struct trace_probe *tp, int argnum)
>  {
>  	struct probe_entry_arg *earg = tp->entry_arg;
> @@ -793,6 +797,20 @@ static int __store_entry_arg(struct trace_probe *tp, int argnum)
>  		tp->entry_arg = earg;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * The entry code array is repeating the pair of
> +	 * [FETCH_OP_ARG(argnum)][FETCH_OP_ST_EDATA(offset of entry data buffer)]
> +	 * and the rest of entries are filled with [FETCH_OP_END].
> +	 *
> +	 * To reduce the redundant function parameter fetching, we scan the entry
> +	 * code array to find the FETCH_OP_ARG which already fetches the 'argnum'
> +	 * parameter. If it doesn't match, update 'offset' to find the last
> +	 * offset.
> +	 * If we find the FETCH_OP_END without matching FETCH_OP_ARG entry, we
> +	 * will save the entry with FETCH_OP_ARG and FETCH_OP_ST_EDATA, and
> +	 * return data offset so that caller can find the data offset in the entry
> +	 * data buffer.
> +	 */

So I'm still not 100% sure what is happening here, but at least these
comments can help me figure it out if I spend some time gawking at the code
a bit more ;-)

Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>

-- Steve


>  	offset = 0;
>  	for (i = 0; i < earg->size - 1; i++) {
>  		switch (earg->code[i].op) {
> @@ -826,6 +844,16 @@ int traceprobe_get_entry_data_size(struct trace_probe *tp)
>  	if (!earg)
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * earg->code[] array has an operation sequence which is run in
> +	 * the entry handler.
> +	 * The sequence stopped by FETCH_OP_END and each data stored in
> +	 * the entry data buffer by FETCH_OP_ST_EDATA. The FETCH_OP_ST_EDATA
> +	 * stores the data at the data buffer + its offset, and all data are
> +	 * "unsigned long" size. The offset must be increased when a data is
> +	 * stored. Thus we need to find the last FETCH_OP_ST_EDATA in the
> +	 * code array.
> +	 */
>  	for (i = 0; i < earg->size; i++) {
>  		switch (earg->code[i].op) {
>  		case FETCH_OP_END:


  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-28 22:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-27  0:45 [PATCH] tracing: probe-events: Add comments about entry data storing code Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2025-02-28 22:47 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2025-03-03  6:36   ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250228174712.44e03694@gandalf.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox