From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED9162690F6; Thu, 13 Mar 2025 16:08:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741882087; cv=none; b=NjYPLUZYUsV/b3HWiUFCuKBXcQYhPw/vas+ObAIXk89+iP6RdGXVCs/nvdl4fjtVsJFjnGVWPjmX9FHTUkoZSWEv+C8vP3uUbaq1cYIrDQufVwVV7X0ABjEmPqgt5SNLAbzwcvE/vf3lvRank9OWrknTkke+jTx8zaFyDpsGTtI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741882087; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uiO8My9dexLqKjb5e3gJbZmS4+WUeImqOrR3ZNC2bhg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=SvpwEpD+fgopuc/CwDzqbuQSLclFP3t+xQel5imPvZtVvVI4VLA+1wMvWVr841to3ifnprnH/D7v3KSQqbbvochT6qxnroMuqr2hcWeX/LX8oMAj+Q9i3+EdVBwFEkwd5Sk9oiQAfTrghrupjpDzMCNnp9ojgO2eMewRzYaiCAk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=KYQSjbi8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="KYQSjbi8" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1741882086; x=1773418086; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=uiO8My9dexLqKjb5e3gJbZmS4+WUeImqOrR3ZNC2bhg=; b=KYQSjbi8mwLs3nWVL1turjT879E7aeIhOUiSsdeLzU0R6JUs5nF1Tkon 2iDWbwprDvWGTIU+TafzgWeZik0vLgSWjp4CrfctxOkBCQVHwm0+TPloV c7K5xzzMgzLpCz+0012pESPFd7t6mxxzHN0hdLSZPpqaYjkgfR5Ej7BAu 5+gNbhrpwy8ishmVhiWqCMbDymkwuSDHd2YgYLFvJh1iu7C/leS6sUIna 71vQfOGH2ifNrkboLir+jzF38hZg/DZwAkBygI1culiSnYFwCMilrFhCu 08nQOAfMKROIwgYXjkR9f5h1M0WvOh4fi9N2L6FGp+hqTASFUZ1e7FHMS Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: XHJz9mtKTUaagkhvg/qCkA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: wMjsN0mESxmFmzfFeXfOMg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11372"; a="42919149" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,245,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="42919149" Received: from fmviesa008.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.148]) by orvoesa113.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Mar 2025 09:08:05 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 9OOSRdT4QFGZfrX2e2lbSA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: arr/YG9GTjSRDu2Gp79T8A== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,245,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="121211093" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO a4747d147074) ([10.239.97.151]) by fmviesa008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Mar 2025 09:08:03 -0700 Received: from kbuild by a4747d147074 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tsl6G-0009dC-2b; Thu, 13 Mar 2025 16:08:00 +0000 Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 00:07:57 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Nam Cao , Steven Rostedt , Gabriele Monaco , john.ogness@linutronix.de, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Nam Cao , Petr Mladek , Sergey Senozhatsky Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] rv: Let the reactors take care of buffers Message-ID: <202503132350.aM5NZ6Vh-lkp@intel.com> References: <90868f1dd49680ec63c961ec8c72ceb64f1af091.1741708239.git.namcao@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <90868f1dd49680ec63c961ec8c72ceb64f1af091.1741708239.git.namcao@linutronix.de> Hi Nam, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on trace/for-next] [also build test ERROR on tip/x86/core tip/x86/mm linus/master v6.14-rc6 next-20250313] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Nam-Cao/rv-Add-undef-TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE/20250312-011043 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/90868f1dd49680ec63c961ec8c72ceb64f1af091.1741708239.git.namcao%40linutronix.de patch subject: [PATCH 02/10] rv: Let the reactors take care of buffers config: parisc-randconfig-002-20250313 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250313/202503132350.aM5NZ6Vh-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: hppa-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250313/202503132350.aM5NZ6Vh-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202503132350.aM5NZ6Vh-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): kernel/trace/rv/reactor_printk.c: In function 'rv_printk_reaction': >> kernel/trace/rv/reactor_printk.c:20:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'vprintk_deferred'; did you mean '_printk_deferred'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 20 | vprintk_deferred(msg, args); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | _printk_deferred vim +20 kernel/trace/rv/reactor_printk.c 14 15 static void rv_printk_reaction(const char *msg, ...) 16 { 17 va_list args; 18 19 va_start(args, msg); > 20 vprintk_deferred(msg, args); 21 va_end(args); 22 } 23 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki