From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@gmail.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Fix error handling in event_trigger_parse
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 05:26:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250322052645.66a0393a@batman.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <02549e50e26565ffb54ea943af87c19f40692576.camel@kernel.org>
On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 14:03:03 -0500
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org> wrote:
> In both these cases, the code calls kfree() directly in order to avoid
> the WARN_ON_ONCE(data->ref) check.
>
> In the first case (remove), trigger_data is only being used as a test
> object and will never have data->ref incremented.
>
> The second case is the failure case, which is also dealing with a
> trigger_data object that hasn't been successfully registered and
> therefore has a 0 data->ref.
>
> So perhaps the event_trigger_alloc doc should be changed to something
> like:
>
> "Use event_trigger_free() to free a successfully registered
> event_trigger_data object."
Honestly, I think event_trigger_alloc() should set the data->ref to 1,
and remove the event_trigger_init() from those that use
event_trigger_alloc(). Then it's a lot easier to map
event_trigger_free() to event_trigger_alloc() and the users don't need
to keep track of the internals of event_triggers.
Then we don't need to have special cases of error conditions after
event_trigger_alloc(), we can simply use this patch.
So, this patch should stay as is, but another patch is needed before
this to make event_trigger_alloc() set data->ref to 1, and remove the
event_trigger_init() from the callers of event_trigger_alloc().
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-22 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-18 11:27 [PATCH] tracing: Fix error handling in event_trigger_parse Miaoqian Lin
2025-03-19 0:06 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-03-19 19:03 ` Tom Zanussi
2025-03-22 9:26 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2025-05-07 13:52 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250322052645.66a0393a@batman.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=linmq006@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=zanussi@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).