From: pengdonglin <dolinux.peng@gmail.com>
To: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: mhiramat@kernel.org, dolinux.peng@gmai.com,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
pengdonglin <dolinux.peng@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ftrace: Fix preemption acounting for stacktrace trigger command
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 17:42:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250512094246.1167956-1-dolinux.peng@gmail.com> (raw)
From: pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com>
While using the stacktrace trigger command to trace syscalls/sys_enter_read,
I noticed that the preemption count was consistently reported as 1, which seemed
incorrect:
root@ubuntu22-vm:/sys/kernel/tracing/events/syscalls/sys_enter_read
$ echo stacktrace > trigger
$ echo 1 > enable
sshd-416 [002] ..... 232.864910: sys_read(fd: a, buf: 556b1f3221d0, count: 8000)
sshd-416 [002] ...1. 232.864913: <stack trace>
=> ftrace_syscall_enter
=> syscall_trace_enter
=> do_syscall_64
=> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
The root cause is that the trace framework disables preemption in __DO_TRACE before
invoking the trigger callback.
This patch uses tracing_gen_ctx_dec() to obtain the correct preemption
count within the callback, resulting in accurate reporting:
sshd-410 [004] ..... 210.117660: sys_read(fd: 4, buf: 559b725ba130, count: 40000)
sshd-410 [004] ..... 210.117662: <stack trace>
=> ftrace_syscall_enter
=> syscall_trace_enter
=> do_syscall_64
=> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
Signed-off-by: pengdonglin <dolinux.peng@gmail.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
index b66b6d235d91..6e87ae2a1a66 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
@@ -1560,7 +1560,7 @@ stacktrace_trigger(struct event_trigger_data *data,
struct trace_event_file *file = data->private_data;
if (file)
- __trace_stack(file->tr, tracing_gen_ctx(), STACK_SKIP);
+ __trace_stack(file->tr, tracing_gen_ctx_dec(), STACK_SKIP);
else
trace_dump_stack(STACK_SKIP);
}
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-05-12 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-12 9:42 pengdonglin [this message]
2025-05-12 9:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] ftrace: Fix preemption acounting for stacktrace filter command pengdonglin
2025-05-12 14:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] ftrace: Fix preemption acounting for stacktrace trigger command Steven Rostedt
2025-05-12 14:31 ` Donglin Peng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250512094246.1167956-1-dolinux.peng@gmail.com \
--to=dolinux.peng@gmail.com \
--cc=dolinux.peng@gmai.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).