From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D403820E007; Mon, 16 Jun 2025 20:18:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750105106; cv=none; b=IC9mj/YJuizInpVQaNkzWn+w6hgG5pHyurcHxqBc9mQkmI2jB9NuN0B3S27H+58sABDl07tlrI+YJ1RVjfRKq07gUvVImewutUnTWuyxn7p+c/yyqAk67hf4nIJqp8QlaKvCbtm/PK8cEHei62SvGr9mXhmAw7nBNzZsqFepOYY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750105106; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/MZXgXnlklMlun1yRXTlVVqUOti5H5p9f/tFG3NnfAA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Rt9jCyoG7RGCa5vMQ5AjmdFUW64m6yPoZ8aTXjG/8W5GorvBpbMmSqPzqRaj4x9lOPsdPZzvKPyWHRK5Rzi2Y0iruFiU4QPIkQx5afbCCAgQei0q7NyR94VTjZsHuxseWpXxJsgaMOrLTR/MaiTrngJ+Y/VyrJapVhZBqzeODWY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=q1L+5YqC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="q1L+5YqC" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04310C4CEEA; Mon, 16 Jun 2025 20:18:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1750105106; bh=/MZXgXnlklMlun1yRXTlVVqUOti5H5p9f/tFG3NnfAA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=q1L+5YqCUVTRb+sOuaFaGlDkz9czU/kPnX3LPHN2U1saqAO6c8YetXiqAzlcKYTKC Q4YjUimfqO8SMT3VKuIlka4XfEQYrzO4qsWMP+r87oXMW0PicD7o1mWuRIERfQXD0R mA65oZ82F5pdSY3CMBhAVOYfqJwjgn4NiNasnoAIQlhMGGpAnLZY7UJR/Tye8finGg IHAxdN0qeUHBXXflfJa4hJxCSBM8QYv1ZdueB1vxq0zF+s0Jra/Ls/FVi4TDfeXyqy xWVyPtx/Ni+UWM3uASdVV4J7GFMsbysREi9C6YBQlaQeoPJiHJL9uznUL+ODLALw4O AYxNt4FX9kXMQ== Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 13:18:25 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Simon Horman , LKML , Linux trace kernel , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu , Mathieu Desnoyers , Eric Dumazet , Neal Cardwell , Kuniyuki Iwashima Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/tcp_ao: tracing: Hide tcp_ao events under CONFIG_TCP_AO Message-ID: <20250616131825.65e1c058@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20250616144718.4e8e12bf@batman.local.home> References: <20250612094616.4222daf0@batman.local.home> <20250614153003.GP414686@horms.kernel.org> <20250616144718.4e8e12bf@batman.local.home> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 14:47:18 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 16:30:03 +0100 > Simon Horman wrote: > > > I agree that the events and classes covered by this #define > > are not used unless CONFIG_TCP_AO is set. And that the small > > number of TCP_AO related events that are left outside > > the define are used even when CONFIG_TCP_AO is not set. > > > > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman > > Should I take this or should this go through the networking tree? Weak preference towards networking tree. We'll apply by the end of the day.