linux-trace-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	"Song Liu" <songliubraving@fb.com>, "Yonghong Song" <yhs@fb.com>,
	"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	"Hao Luo" <haoluo@google.com>,
	"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	"Alan Maguire" <alan.maguire@oracle.com>,
	"David Laight" <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
	"Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas@t-8ch.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCHv4 perf/core 14/22] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe/usdt syscall tests
Date: Tue,  8 Jul 2025 15:23:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250708132333.2739553-15-jolsa@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250708132333.2739553-1-jolsa@kernel.org>

Adding tests for optimized uprobe/usdt probes.

Checking that we get expected trampoline and attached bpf programs
get executed properly.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c | 284 +++++++++++++++++-
 .../bpf/progs/uprobe_syscall_executed.c       |  52 ++++
 2 files changed, 335 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
index 1cce50b5d18c..5709dc58f8c2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
 #include <asm/ptrace.h>
 #include <linux/compiler.h>
 #include <linux/stringify.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <sys/wait.h>
 #include <sys/syscall.h>
 #include <sys/prctl.h>
@@ -15,6 +16,11 @@
 #include "uprobe_syscall.skel.h"
 #include "uprobe_syscall_executed.skel.h"
 
+#define USDT_NOP .byte 0x0f, 0x1f, 0x44, 0x00, 0x00
+#include "usdt.h"
+
+#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wattributes"
+
 __naked unsigned long uretprobe_regs_trigger(void)
 {
 	asm volatile (
@@ -305,6 +311,265 @@ static void test_uretprobe_syscall_call(void)
 	close(go[0]);
 }
 
+#define TRAMP "[uprobes-trampoline]"
+
+__attribute__((aligned(16)))
+__nocf_check __weak __naked void uprobe_test(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\n"
+		".byte 0x0f, 0x1f, 0x44, 0x00, 0x00	\n"
+		"ret					\n"
+	);
+}
+
+__attribute__((aligned(16)))
+__nocf_check __weak void usdt_test(void)
+{
+	USDT(optimized_uprobe, usdt);
+}
+
+static int find_uprobes_trampoline(void *tramp_addr)
+{
+	void *start, *end;
+	char line[128];
+	int ret = -1;
+	FILE *maps;
+
+	maps = fopen("/proc/self/maps", "r");
+	if (!maps) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "cannot open maps\n");
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	while (fgets(line, sizeof(line), maps)) {
+		int m = -1;
+
+		/* We care only about private r-x mappings. */
+		if (sscanf(line, "%p-%p r-xp %*x %*x:%*x %*u %n", &start, &end, &m) != 2)
+			continue;
+		if (m < 0)
+			continue;
+		if (!strncmp(&line[m], TRAMP, sizeof(TRAMP)-1) && (start == tramp_addr)) {
+			ret = 0;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+
+	fclose(maps);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static unsigned char nop5[5] = { 0x0f, 0x1f, 0x44, 0x00, 0x00 };
+
+static void *find_nop5(void *fn)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
+		if (!memcmp(nop5, fn + i, 5))
+			return fn + i;
+	}
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+typedef void (__attribute__((nocf_check)) *trigger_t)(void);
+
+static bool shstk_is_enabled;
+
+static void *check_attach(struct uprobe_syscall_executed *skel, trigger_t trigger,
+			  void *addr, int executed)
+{
+	struct __arch_relative_insn {
+		__u8 op;
+		__s32 raddr;
+	} __packed *call;
+	void *tramp = NULL;
+	__u8 *bp;
+
+	/* Uprobe gets optimized after first trigger, so let's press twice. */
+	trigger();
+	trigger();
+
+	/* Make sure bpf program got executed.. */
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->executed, executed, "executed");
+
+	if (shstk_is_enabled) {
+		/* .. and check optimization is disabled under shadow stack. */
+		bp = (__u8 *) addr;
+		ASSERT_EQ(*bp, 0xcc, "int3");
+	} else {
+		/* .. and check the trampoline is as expected. */
+		call = (struct __arch_relative_insn *) addr;
+		tramp = (void *) (call + 1) + call->raddr;
+		ASSERT_EQ(call->op, 0xe8, "call");
+		ASSERT_OK(find_uprobes_trampoline(tramp), "uprobes_trampoline");
+	}
+
+	return tramp;
+}
+
+static void check_detach(void *addr, void *tramp)
+{
+	/* [uprobes_trampoline] stays after detach */
+	ASSERT_OK(!shstk_is_enabled && find_uprobes_trampoline(tramp), "uprobes_trampoline");
+	ASSERT_OK(memcmp(addr, nop5, 5), "nop5");
+}
+
+static void check(struct uprobe_syscall_executed *skel, struct bpf_link *link,
+		  trigger_t trigger, void *addr, int executed)
+{
+	void *tramp;
+
+	tramp = check_attach(skel, trigger, addr, executed);
+	bpf_link__destroy(link);
+	check_detach(addr, tramp);
+}
+
+static void test_uprobe_legacy(void)
+{
+	struct uprobe_syscall_executed *skel = NULL;
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_uprobe_opts, opts,
+		.retprobe = true,
+	);
+	struct bpf_link *link;
+	unsigned long offset;
+
+	offset = get_uprobe_offset(&uprobe_test);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(offset, 0, "get_uprobe_offset"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	/* uprobe */
+	skel = uprobe_syscall_executed__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "uprobe_syscall_executed__open_and_load"))
+		return;
+
+	skel->bss->pid = getpid();
+
+	link = bpf_program__attach_uprobe_opts(skel->progs.test_uprobe,
+				0, "/proc/self/exe", offset, NULL);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "bpf_program__attach_uprobe_opts"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	check(skel, link, uprobe_test, uprobe_test, 2);
+
+	/* uretprobe */
+	skel->bss->executed = 0;
+
+	link = bpf_program__attach_uprobe_opts(skel->progs.test_uretprobe,
+				0, "/proc/self/exe", offset, &opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "bpf_program__attach_uprobe_opts"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	check(skel, link, uprobe_test, uprobe_test, 2);
+
+cleanup:
+	uprobe_syscall_executed__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+static void test_uprobe_multi(void)
+{
+	struct uprobe_syscall_executed *skel = NULL;
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_uprobe_multi_opts, opts);
+	struct bpf_link *link;
+	unsigned long offset;
+
+	offset = get_uprobe_offset(&uprobe_test);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(offset, 0, "get_uprobe_offset"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	opts.offsets = &offset;
+	opts.cnt = 1;
+
+	skel = uprobe_syscall_executed__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "uprobe_syscall_executed__open_and_load"))
+		return;
+
+	skel->bss->pid = getpid();
+
+	/* uprobe.multi */
+	link = bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi(skel->progs.test_uprobe_multi,
+				0, "/proc/self/exe", NULL, &opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	check(skel, link, uprobe_test, uprobe_test, 2);
+
+	/* uretprobe.multi */
+	skel->bss->executed = 0;
+	opts.retprobe = true;
+	link = bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi(skel->progs.test_uretprobe_multi,
+				0, "/proc/self/exe", NULL, &opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	check(skel, link, uprobe_test, uprobe_test, 2);
+
+cleanup:
+	uprobe_syscall_executed__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+static void test_uprobe_session(void)
+{
+	struct uprobe_syscall_executed *skel = NULL;
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_uprobe_multi_opts, opts,
+		.session = true,
+	);
+	struct bpf_link *link;
+	unsigned long offset;
+
+	offset = get_uprobe_offset(&uprobe_test);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(offset, 0, "get_uprobe_offset"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	opts.offsets = &offset;
+	opts.cnt = 1;
+
+	skel = uprobe_syscall_executed__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "uprobe_syscall_executed__open_and_load"))
+		return;
+
+	skel->bss->pid = getpid();
+
+	link = bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi(skel->progs.test_uprobe_session,
+				0, "/proc/self/exe", NULL, &opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	check(skel, link, uprobe_test, uprobe_test, 4);
+
+cleanup:
+	uprobe_syscall_executed__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+static void test_uprobe_usdt(void)
+{
+	struct uprobe_syscall_executed *skel;
+	struct bpf_link *link;
+	void *addr;
+
+	errno = 0;
+	addr = find_nop5(usdt_test);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(addr, "find_nop5"))
+		return;
+
+	skel = uprobe_syscall_executed__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "uprobe_syscall_executed__open_and_load"))
+		return;
+
+	skel->bss->pid = getpid();
+
+	link = bpf_program__attach_usdt(skel->progs.test_usdt,
+				-1 /* all PIDs */, "/proc/self/exe",
+				"optimized_uprobe", "usdt", NULL);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "bpf_program__attach_usdt"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	check(skel, link, usdt_test, addr, 2);
+
+cleanup:
+	uprobe_syscall_executed__destroy(skel);
+}
+
 /*
  * Borrowed from tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_shadow_stack.c.
  *
@@ -347,11 +612,20 @@ static void test_uretprobe_shadow_stack(void)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	/* Run all of the uretprobe tests. */
+	/* Run all the tests with shadow stack in place. */
+	shstk_is_enabled = true;
+
 	test_uretprobe_regs_equal();
 	test_uretprobe_regs_change();
 	test_uretprobe_syscall_call();
 
+	test_uprobe_legacy();
+	test_uprobe_multi();
+	test_uprobe_session();
+	test_uprobe_usdt();
+
+	shstk_is_enabled = false;
+
 	ARCH_PRCTL(ARCH_SHSTK_DISABLE, ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK);
 }
 
@@ -365,6 +639,14 @@ static void __test_uprobe_syscall(void)
 		test_uretprobe_syscall_call();
 	if (test__start_subtest("uretprobe_shadow_stack"))
 		test_uretprobe_shadow_stack();
+	if (test__start_subtest("uprobe_legacy"))
+		test_uprobe_legacy();
+	if (test__start_subtest("uprobe_multi"))
+		test_uprobe_multi();
+	if (test__start_subtest("uprobe_session"))
+		test_uprobe_session();
+	if (test__start_subtest("uprobe_usdt"))
+		test_uprobe_usdt();
 }
 #else
 static void __test_uprobe_syscall(void)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_syscall_executed.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_syscall_executed.c
index 8f48976a33aa..915d38591bf6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_syscall_executed.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_syscall_executed.c
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 #include "vmlinux.h"
 #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include <bpf/usdt.bpf.h>
 #include <string.h>
 
 struct pt_regs regs;
@@ -10,6 +12,36 @@ char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
 int executed = 0;
 int pid;
 
+SEC("uprobe")
+int BPF_UPROBE(test_uprobe)
+{
+	if (bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32 != pid)
+		return 0;
+
+	executed++;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("uretprobe")
+int BPF_URETPROBE(test_uretprobe)
+{
+	if (bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32 != pid)
+		return 0;
+
+	executed++;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("uprobe.multi")
+int test_uprobe_multi(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+	if (bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32 != pid)
+		return 0;
+
+	executed++;
+	return 0;
+}
+
 SEC("uretprobe.multi")
 int test_uretprobe_multi(struct pt_regs *ctx)
 {
@@ -19,3 +51,23 @@ int test_uretprobe_multi(struct pt_regs *ctx)
 	executed++;
 	return 0;
 }
+
+SEC("uprobe.session")
+int test_uprobe_session(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+	if (bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32 != pid)
+		return 0;
+
+	executed++;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("usdt")
+int test_usdt(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+	if (bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32 != pid)
+		return 0;
+
+	executed++;
+	return 0;
+}
-- 
2.50.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-08 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-08 13:23 [PATCHv4 perf/core 00/22] uprobes: Add support to optimize usdt probes on x86_64 Jiri Olsa
2025-07-08 13:23 ` [PATCHv4 perf/core 01/22] uprobes: Remove breakpoint in unapply_uprobe under mmap_write_lock Jiri Olsa
2025-07-08 13:23 ` [PATCHv4 perf/core 02/22] uprobes: Rename arch_uretprobe_trampoline function Jiri Olsa
2025-07-08 13:23 ` [PATCHv4 perf/core 03/22] uprobes: Make copy_from_page global Jiri Olsa
2025-07-08 13:23 ` [PATCHv4 perf/core 04/22] uprobes: Add uprobe_write function Jiri Olsa
2025-07-08 13:23 ` [PATCHv4 perf/core 05/22] uprobes: Add nbytes argument to uprobe_write Jiri Olsa
2025-07-08 13:23 ` [PATCHv4 perf/core 06/22] uprobes: Add is_register argument to uprobe_write and uprobe_write_opcode Jiri Olsa
2025-07-08 13:23 ` [PATCHv4 perf/core 07/22] uprobes: Add do_ref_ctr argument to uprobe_write function Jiri Olsa
2025-07-08 13:23 ` [PATCHv4 perf/core 08/22] uprobes/x86: Add mapping for optimized uprobe trampolines Jiri Olsa
2025-07-10  7:02   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-07-10 13:42     ` Jiri Olsa
2025-07-11  5:26       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-07-08 13:23 ` [PATCHv4 perf/core 09/22] uprobes/x86: Add uprobe syscall to speed up uprobe Jiri Olsa
2025-07-08 13:23 ` [PATCHv4 perf/core 10/22] uprobes/x86: Add support to optimize uprobes Jiri Olsa
2025-07-08 13:23 ` [PATCHv4 perf/core 11/22] selftests/bpf: Import usdt.h from libbpf/usdt project Jiri Olsa
2025-07-08 13:23 ` [PATCHv4 perf/core 12/22] selftests/bpf: Reorg the uprobe_syscall test function Jiri Olsa
2025-07-08 13:23 ` [PATCHv4 perf/core 13/22] selftests/bpf: Rename uprobe_syscall_executed prog to test_uretprobe_multi Jiri Olsa
2025-07-08 13:23 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2025-07-08 13:23 ` [PATCHv4 perf/core 15/22] selftests/bpf: Add hit/attach/detach race optimized uprobe test Jiri Olsa
2025-07-08 13:23 ` [PATCHv4 perf/core 16/22] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe syscall sigill signal test Jiri Olsa
2025-07-08 13:23 ` [PATCHv4 perf/core 17/22] selftests/bpf: Add optimized usdt variant for basic usdt test Jiri Olsa
2025-07-08 13:23 ` [PATCHv4 perf/core 18/22] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe_regs_equal test Jiri Olsa
2025-07-08 13:23 ` [PATCHv4 perf/core 19/22] selftests/bpf: Change test_uretprobe_regs_change for uprobe and uretprobe Jiri Olsa
2025-07-08 13:23 ` [PATCHv4 perf/core 20/22] seccomp: passthrough uprobe systemcall without filtering Jiri Olsa
2025-07-08 13:23 ` [PATCHv4 perf/core 21/22] selftests/seccomp: validate uprobe syscall passes through seccomp Jiri Olsa
2025-07-08 13:23 ` [PATCHv4 22/22] man2: Add uprobe syscall page Jiri Olsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250708132333.2739553-15-jolsa@kernel.org \
    --to=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
    --cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=thomas@t-8ch.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).