From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat@oracle.com>,
"Jose E. Marchesi" <jemarch@gnu.org>,
Beau Belgrave <beaub@linux.microsoft.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 06/12] unwind_user/sframe: Wire up unwind_user to sframe
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 16:51:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250710165157.6e0936e9@batman.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250710113039.04a431d9@batman.local.home>
On Thu, 10 Jul 2025 11:30:39 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> I'm not too comfortable with the compat patches at this stage. I'm
> thinking of separating out the compat patches, and just reject the
> deferred unwind if the task is in compat mode (forcing perf or other
> tracers to use whatever it uses today).
>
> I'll take Mathieu's patches and merge them with Josh's, but make them a
> separate series.
So I'm removing the two compat patches from the series for now and plan
to replace it with this:
-- Steve
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: [PATCH] unwind deferred/x86: Do not defer stack tracing for compat
tasks
Currently compat tasks are not supported. If a deferred user space stack
trace is requested on a compat task, it should fail and return an error so
that the profiler can use an alternative approach (whatever it uses
today).
Add a arch_unwind_can_defer() macro that is called in
unwind_deferred_request(). Have x86 define it to a function that makes
sure that the current task is running in 64bit mode, and if it is not, it
returns false. This will cause unwind_deferred_request() to error out and
the caller can use the current method of user space stack tracing.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/unwind_user.h | 11 +++++++++++
include/linux/unwind_deferred.h | 5 +++++
kernel/unwind/deferred.c | 3 +++
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/unwind_user.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/unwind_user.h
index 8597857bf896..220fd0a6e175 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/unwind_user.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/unwind_user.h
@@ -2,6 +2,17 @@
#ifndef _ASM_X86_UNWIND_USER_H
#define _ASM_X86_UNWIND_USER_H
+#ifdef CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION
+/* Currently compat mode is not supported for deferred stack trace */
+static inline bool arch_unwind_can_defer(void)
+{
+ struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(current);
+
+ return user_64bit_mode(regs);
+}
+# define arch_unwind_can_defer arch_unwind_can_defer
+#endif /* CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION */
+
#define ARCH_INIT_USER_FP_FRAME \
.cfa_off = (s32)sizeof(long) * 2, \
.ra_off = (s32)sizeof(long) * -1, \
diff --git a/include/linux/unwind_deferred.h b/include/linux/unwind_deferred.h
index a9d5b100d6b2..6ba4fff066dd 100644
--- a/include/linux/unwind_deferred.h
+++ b/include/linux/unwind_deferred.h
@@ -16,6 +16,11 @@ struct unwind_work {
int bit;
};
+/* Architectures can add a test to not defer unwinding */
+#ifndef arch_unwind_can_defer
+# define arch_unwind_can_defer() (true)
+#endif
+
#ifdef CONFIG_UNWIND_USER
#define UNWIND_PENDING_BIT (BITS_PER_LONG - 1)
diff --git a/kernel/unwind/deferred.c b/kernel/unwind/deferred.c
index 039e12700d49..745144e4717c 100644
--- a/kernel/unwind/deferred.c
+++ b/kernel/unwind/deferred.c
@@ -236,6 +236,9 @@ int unwind_deferred_request(struct unwind_work *work, u64 *cookie)
*cookie = 0;
+ if (!arch_unwind_can_defer())
+ return -EINVAL;
+
if ((current->flags & (PF_KTHREAD | PF_EXITING)) ||
!user_mode(task_pt_regs(current)))
return -EINVAL;
--
2.47.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-10 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-08 2:11 [PATCH v8 00/12] unwind_deferred: Implement sframe handling Steven Rostedt
2025-07-08 2:11 ` [PATCH v8 01/12] unwind_user/sframe: Add support for reading .sframe headers Steven Rostedt
2025-07-08 2:11 ` [PATCH v8 02/12] unwind_user/sframe: Store sframe section data in per-mm maple tree Steven Rostedt
2025-07-08 2:11 ` [PATCH v8 03/12] x86/uaccess: Add unsafe_copy_from_user() implementation Steven Rostedt
2025-07-08 2:11 ` [PATCH v8 04/12] unwind_user/sframe: Add support for reading .sframe contents Steven Rostedt
2025-07-08 2:11 ` [PATCH v8 05/12] unwind_user/sframe: Detect .sframe sections in executables Steven Rostedt
2025-07-08 2:11 ` [PATCH v8 06/12] unwind_user/sframe: Wire up unwind_user to sframe Steven Rostedt
2025-07-08 19:58 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-07-08 20:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-09 7:58 ` Jens Remus
2025-07-09 13:46 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-07-09 13:51 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-07-09 14:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-09 14:10 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-07-09 14:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-09 15:14 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-07-10 8:03 ` Jens Remus
2025-07-10 9:26 ` Jens Remus
2025-07-10 15:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-10 20:51 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2025-07-08 2:11 ` [PATCH v8 07/12] unwind_user/sframe/x86: Enable sframe unwinding on x86 Steven Rostedt
2025-07-08 2:11 ` [PATCH v8 08/12] unwind_user/sframe: Remove .sframe section on detected corruption Steven Rostedt
2025-07-08 2:11 ` [PATCH v8 09/12] unwind_user/sframe: Show file name in debug output Steven Rostedt
2025-07-08 2:11 ` [PATCH v8 10/12] unwind_user/sframe: Enable debugging in uaccess regions Steven Rostedt
2025-07-08 3:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-07-08 13:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-08 14:34 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-08 14:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-08 15:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-07-08 16:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-08 18:57 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-07-08 15:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-07-08 2:11 ` [PATCH v8 11/12] unwind_user/sframe: Add .sframe validation option Steven Rostedt
2025-07-08 2:11 ` [PATCH v8 12/12] unwind_user/sframe: Add prctl() interface for registering .sframe sections Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250710165157.6e0936e9@batman.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=beaub@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=indu.bhagat@oracle.com \
--cc=jemarch@gnu.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=jremus@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@kernel.org \
--cc=sam@gentoo.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).