Re: [PATCH v1 05/16] iommu/dma: rename iommu_dma_*map_page to iommu_dma_*map_phys

[Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>]

On Mon, Aug 04, 2025 at 03:42:39PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> index 399838c17b705..11c5d5f8c0981 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> @@ -1190,11 +1190,9 @@ static inline size_t iova_unaligned(struct iova_domain *iovad, phys_addr_t phys,
>  	return iova_offset(iovad, phys | size);
>  }
>  
> -dma_addr_t iommu_dma_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
> -	      unsigned long offset, size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
> -	      unsigned long attrs)
> +dma_addr_t iommu_dma_map_phys(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t phys, size_t size,
> +		enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)
>  {
> -	phys_addr_t phys = page_to_phys(page) + offset;
>  	bool coherent = dev_is_dma_coherent(dev);
>  	int prot = dma_info_to_prot(dir, coherent, attrs);
>  	struct iommu_domain *domain = iommu_get_dma_domain(dev);

No issue with pushing the page_to_phys to the looks like two callers..

It is worth pointing though that today if the page * was a
MEMORY_DEVICE_PCI_P2PDMA page then it is illegal to call the swiotlb
functions a few lines below this:

                phys = iommu_dma_map_swiotlb(dev, phys, size, dir, attrs);

ie struct page alone as a type is not sufficient to make this function
safe for a long time now.

So I would add some explanation in the commit message how this will be
situated in the final call chains, and maybe leave behind a comment
that attrs may not have ATTR_MMIO in this function.

I think the answer is iommu_dma_map_phys() is only called for
!ATTR_MMIO addresses, and that iommu_dma_map_resource() will be called
for ATTR_MMIO?

Jason