From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Takaya Saeki <takayas@google.com>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
aahringo@redhat.com, Douglas Raillard <douglas.raillard@arm.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] tracing: Replace syscall RCU pointer assignment with READ/WRITE_ONCE()
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2025 06:05:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202508070546.KmEoxWkg-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250805193234.745705874@kernel.org>
Hi Steven,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on trace/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.16 next-20250806]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Steven-Rostedt/tracing-Replace-syscall-RCU-pointer-assignment-with-READ-WRITE_ONCE/20250806-122312
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250805193234.745705874%40kernel.org
patch subject: [PATCH 1/7] tracing: Replace syscall RCU pointer assignment with READ/WRITE_ONCE()
config: x86_64-randconfig-123-20250806 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250807/202508070546.KmEoxWkg-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14+deb12u1) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250807/202508070546.KmEoxWkg-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202508070546.KmEoxWkg-lkp@intel.com/
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c:313:20: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) @@ expected struct trace_event_file *trace_file @@ got struct trace_event_file [noderef] __rcu * @@
kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c:313:20: sparse: expected struct trace_event_file *trace_file
kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c:313:20: sparse: got struct trace_event_file [noderef] __rcu *
kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c:358:20: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) @@ expected struct trace_event_file *trace_file @@ got struct trace_event_file [noderef] __rcu * @@
kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c:358:20: sparse: expected struct trace_event_file *trace_file
kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c:358:20: sparse: got struct trace_event_file [noderef] __rcu *
>> kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c:394:17: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) @@ expected struct trace_event_file [noderef] __rcu *volatile @@ got struct trace_event_file *file @@
kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c:394:17: sparse: expected struct trace_event_file [noderef] __rcu *volatile
kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c:394:17: sparse: got struct trace_event_file *file
kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c:432:17: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) @@ expected struct trace_event_file [noderef] __rcu *volatile @@ got struct trace_event_file *file @@
kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c:432:17: sparse: expected struct trace_event_file [noderef] __rcu *volatile
kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c:432:17: sparse: got struct trace_event_file *file
vim +313 kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
290
291 static void ftrace_syscall_enter(void *data, struct pt_regs *regs, long id)
292 {
293 struct trace_array *tr = data;
294 struct trace_event_file *trace_file;
295 struct syscall_trace_enter *entry;
296 struct syscall_metadata *sys_data;
297 struct trace_event_buffer fbuffer;
298 unsigned long args[6];
299 int syscall_nr;
300 int size;
301
302 /*
303 * Syscall probe called with preemption enabled, but the ring
304 * buffer and per-cpu data require preemption to be disabled.
305 */
306 might_fault();
307 guard(preempt_notrace)();
308
309 syscall_nr = trace_get_syscall_nr(current, regs);
310 if (syscall_nr < 0 || syscall_nr >= NR_syscalls)
311 return;
312
> 313 trace_file = READ_ONCE(tr->enter_syscall_files[syscall_nr]);
314 if (!trace_file)
315 return;
316
317 if (trace_trigger_soft_disabled(trace_file))
318 return;
319
320 sys_data = syscall_nr_to_meta(syscall_nr);
321 if (!sys_data)
322 return;
323
324 size = sizeof(*entry) + sizeof(unsigned long) * sys_data->nb_args;
325
326 entry = trace_event_buffer_reserve(&fbuffer, trace_file, size);
327 if (!entry)
328 return;
329
330 entry = ring_buffer_event_data(fbuffer.event);
331 entry->nr = syscall_nr;
332 syscall_get_arguments(current, regs, args);
333 memcpy(entry->args, args, sizeof(unsigned long) * sys_data->nb_args);
334
335 trace_event_buffer_commit(&fbuffer);
336 }
337
338 static void ftrace_syscall_exit(void *data, struct pt_regs *regs, long ret)
339 {
340 struct trace_array *tr = data;
341 struct trace_event_file *trace_file;
342 struct syscall_trace_exit *entry;
343 struct syscall_metadata *sys_data;
344 struct trace_event_buffer fbuffer;
345 int syscall_nr;
346
347 /*
348 * Syscall probe called with preemption enabled, but the ring
349 * buffer and per-cpu data require preemption to be disabled.
350 */
351 might_fault();
352 guard(preempt_notrace)();
353
354 syscall_nr = trace_get_syscall_nr(current, regs);
355 if (syscall_nr < 0 || syscall_nr >= NR_syscalls)
356 return;
357
358 trace_file = READ_ONCE(tr->exit_syscall_files[syscall_nr]);
359 if (!trace_file)
360 return;
361
362 if (trace_trigger_soft_disabled(trace_file))
363 return;
364
365 sys_data = syscall_nr_to_meta(syscall_nr);
366 if (!sys_data)
367 return;
368
369 entry = trace_event_buffer_reserve(&fbuffer, trace_file, sizeof(*entry));
370 if (!entry)
371 return;
372
373 entry = ring_buffer_event_data(fbuffer.event);
374 entry->nr = syscall_nr;
375 entry->ret = syscall_get_return_value(current, regs);
376
377 trace_event_buffer_commit(&fbuffer);
378 }
379
380 static int reg_event_syscall_enter(struct trace_event_file *file,
381 struct trace_event_call *call)
382 {
383 struct trace_array *tr = file->tr;
384 int ret = 0;
385 int num;
386
387 num = ((struct syscall_metadata *)call->data)->syscall_nr;
388 if (WARN_ON_ONCE(num < 0 || num >= NR_syscalls))
389 return -ENOSYS;
390 mutex_lock(&syscall_trace_lock);
391 if (!tr->sys_refcount_enter)
392 ret = register_trace_sys_enter(ftrace_syscall_enter, tr);
393 if (!ret) {
> 394 WRITE_ONCE(tr->enter_syscall_files[num], file);
395 tr->sys_refcount_enter++;
396 }
397 mutex_unlock(&syscall_trace_lock);
398 return ret;
399 }
400
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-06 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-05 19:26 [PATCH 0/7] tracing: Show contents of syscall trace event user space fields Steven Rostedt
2025-08-05 19:26 ` [PATCH 1/7] tracing: Replace syscall RCU pointer assignment with READ/WRITE_ONCE() Steven Rostedt
2025-08-06 18:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-08-06 22:05 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-08-05 19:26 ` [PATCH 2/7] tracing: Have syscall trace events show "0x" for values greater than 10 Steven Rostedt
2025-08-06 10:24 ` Douglas Raillard
2025-08-06 12:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-08-06 16:42 ` Douglas Raillard
2025-08-12 19:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-08-05 19:26 ` [PATCH 3/7] tracing: Have syscall trace events read user space string Steven Rostedt
2025-08-06 14:39 ` kernel test robot
2025-08-11 5:19 ` kernel test robot
2025-08-05 19:26 ` [PATCH 4/7] tracing: Have system call events record user array data Steven Rostedt
2025-08-05 19:26 ` [PATCH 5/7] tracing: Display some syscall arrays as strings Steven Rostedt
2025-08-06 15:12 ` kernel test robot
2025-08-05 19:26 ` [PATCH 6/7] tracing: Allow syscall trace events to read more than one user parameter Steven Rostedt
2025-08-06 23:52 ` kernel test robot
2025-08-05 19:26 ` [PATCH 7/7] tracing: Add syscall_user_buf_size to limit amount written Steven Rostedt
2025-08-06 10:50 ` Douglas Raillard
2025-08-06 12:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-08-06 16:21 ` Douglas Raillard
2025-08-06 14:50 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202508070546.KmEoxWkg-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=aahringo@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=douglas.raillard@arm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=takayas@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zanussi@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).