From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0015.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10CB313A86C; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 00:27:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=216.40.44.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755649647; cv=none; b=d7r/14wMP+lKaCz1ZH4naMzWvihDt07Cri7iSrRaxSd42F7QBEfPntUda3Y0Q5lt4z7uHBEL6lUqHQETMqSTd2rf1RINqCoyEhJPKi7BImLcJ2SMxqSnJND9WemhqmvGqN97lHzfV5474tP1vylruGdvR4Y4ZojNIKKgTaJzYDE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755649647; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gm2a1v9IVPuOwd8HEXy/VDr0ag/FHWUnuaXgT4HbLik=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=jJGWWUP54I2HNuYUnRWkbbApsrnrsdwAIs50Xjm15jdQGyMBX9nIk2U93uNrHyUv3q9YoXMGFIw468bQPSAQiHUMYycmmGuup9VFkOCx7997dRYy+0P5lQsJzpDjgP7cHICruO6MDkxd0Nd9yWwVmPHrnASO1QlC6wVDcauIhVE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=goodmis.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=216.40.44.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=goodmis.org Received: from omf18.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3676F1A0287; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 00:27:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [HIDDEN] (Authenticated sender: rostedt@goodmis.org) by omf18.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0590D2E; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 00:27:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 20:27:15 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Huacai Chen Cc: Bibo Mao , LKML , Linux Trace Kernel , kvm@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, Tianrui Zhao , Paolo Bonzini , Masami Hiramatsu , Mathieu Desnoyers Subject: Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: KVM: Move kvm_iocsr tracepoint out of generic code Message-ID: <20250819202715.6f1cf0d6@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20250722094734.4920545b@gandalf.local.home> <2c2f5036-c3ae-3904-e940-8a8b71a65957@loongson.cn> <20250723214659.064b5d4a@gandalf.local.home> <15e46f69-f270-0520-1ad4-874448439d2b@loongson.cn> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.20.0git84 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0590D2E X-Stat-Signature: tui4sbrzrksw68jmexsrk315o7o7n5td X-Rspamd-Server: rspamout02 X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Session-ID: U2FsdGVkX1++WOHapJUxAf+8t+c3THz1mBYsdmfqoyY= X-HE-Tag: 1755649634-528654 X-HE-Meta: U2FsdGVkX18/nuGO+4wD+/Da8NSvPyPWizSJqU41fOf5srsgKcJhPQQfj8hvGQ+9RFovMTcjm++P2p1pyoagm8leyJqJpug8p61ybQ8+cexkgDpssKeB8xI9xycTlttA9xt8WXEOGXRV7XK3QcnZlX+LuM2ynNjWvXuZeBo4kSuNYALGvinW8xJJ+WEF6YjlC4qZRz0c4TI6XUMSF6YzmvvRgpjzTKHrSfL9SB36XUsMlLNwtkx7XWQP3k15iJ8mwYkEEh94ICrMOMwFsmziyefZ5aGK/PHVkYfIRpabd3dghYvjC38hgeeW64t+NZOloc4K+VOJc1fFHqT8wKZ8ECZ8uOTdluHZur+0ngE5ZDCtq3T+E2R1eLk6wTS1LWz/ On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 19:56:42 +0800 Huacai Chen wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 9:51=E2=80=AFAM Bibo Mao wr= ote: > > > > > > > > On 2025/7/24 =E4=B8=8A=E5=8D=889:46, Steven Rostedt wrote: =20 > > > On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 09:39:40 +0800 > > > Bibo Mao wrote: > > > =20 > > >>> #define kvm_fpu_load_symbol \ > > >>> {0, "unload"}, \ > > >>> {1, "load"} > > >>> =20 > > >> Reviewed-by: Bibo Mao =20 > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Should this go through the loongarch tree or should I take it? =20 > > Huacai, > > > > What is your point about this? =20 > I will take it, thanks. >=20 > Huacai Did this fall through the cracks? -- Steve