linux-trace-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: jolsa@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, andrii@kernel.org,
	mhiramat@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	alx@kernel.org, eyal.birger@gmail.com, kees@kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, haoluo@google.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	alan.maguire@oracle.com, David.Laight@ACULAB.COM,
	thomas@t-8ch.de, mingo@kernel.org, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] uprobes/x86: Optimize is_optimize()
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 06:51:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250826065158.1b7ad5fc@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250821123656.823296198@infradead.org>

On Thu, 21 Aug 2025 14:28:24 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> Make is_optimized() return a tri-state and avoid return through
> argument. This simplifies things a little.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c |   34 +++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> @@ -1047,7 +1047,7 @@ static bool __is_optimized(uprobe_opcode
>  	return __in_uprobe_trampoline(vaddr + 5 + call->raddr);
>  }
>  
> -static int is_optimized(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr, bool *optimized)
> +static int is_optimized(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr)
>  {
>  	uprobe_opcode_t insn[5];
>  	int err;
> @@ -1055,8 +1055,7 @@ static int is_optimized(struct mm_struct
>  	err = copy_from_vaddr(mm, vaddr, &insn, 5);
>  	if (err)
>  		return err;
> -	*optimized = __is_optimized((uprobe_opcode_t *)&insn, vaddr);
> -	return 0;
> +	return __is_optimized((uprobe_opcode_t *)&insn, vaddr);
>  }
>  
>  static bool should_optimize(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe)
> @@ -1069,17 +1068,14 @@ int set_swbp(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe
>  	     unsigned long vaddr)
>  {
>  	if (should_optimize(auprobe)) {
> -		bool optimized = false;
> -		int err;
> -
>  		/*
>  		 * We could race with another thread that already optimized the probe,
>  		 * so let's not overwrite it with int3 again in this case.
>  		 */
> -		err = is_optimized(vma->vm_mm, vaddr, &optimized);
> -		if (err)
> -			return err;
> -		if (optimized)
> +		int ret = is_optimized(vma->vm_mm, vaddr);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			return ret;
> +		if (ret)
>  			return 0;

Looks like you should swap over 0 and 1.
That would then be: if (ret <= 0) return ret;

	David

>  	}
>  	return uprobe_write_opcode(auprobe, vma, vaddr, UPROBE_SWBP_INSN,
> @@ -1090,17 +1086,13 @@ int set_orig_insn(struct arch_uprobe *au
>  		  unsigned long vaddr)
>  {
>  	if (test_bit(ARCH_UPROBE_FLAG_CAN_OPTIMIZE, &auprobe->flags)) {
> -		struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
> -		bool optimized = false;
> -		int err;
> -
> -		err = is_optimized(mm, vaddr, &optimized);
> -		if (err)
> -			return err;
> -		if (optimized) {
> -			err = swbp_unoptimize(auprobe, vma, vaddr);
> -			WARN_ON_ONCE(err);
> -			return err;
> +		int ret = is_optimized(vma->vm_mm, vaddr);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			return ret;
> +		if (ret) {
> +			ret = swbp_unoptimize(auprobe, vma, vaddr);
> +			WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
> +			return ret;
>  		}
>  	}
>  	return uprobe_write_opcode(auprobe, vma, vaddr, *(uprobe_opcode_t *)&auprobe->insn,
> 
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-26  5:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-21 12:28 [PATCH 0/6] uprobes/x86: Cleanups and fixes Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-21 12:28 ` [PATCH 1/6] uprobes/x86: Add struct uretprobe_syscall_args Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-21 12:28 ` [PATCH 2/6] uprobes/x86: Optimize is_optimize() Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-26  5:51   ` David Laight [this message]
2025-08-26  8:18     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-27 19:32       ` David Laight
2025-08-26  8:25     ` Jiri Olsa
2025-08-26  8:33       ` Jiri Olsa
2025-08-21 12:28 ` [PATCH 3/6] uprobes/x86: Accept more NOP forms Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-21 12:28 ` [PATCH 4/6] uprobes/x86: Fix uprobe syscall vs shadow stack Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-21 18:26   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-08-21 12:28 ` [PATCH 5/6] uprobes/x86: Make asm style consistent Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-21 12:28 ` [PATCH 6/6] uprobes/x86: Add SLS mitigation to the trampolines Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-10  1:05   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-08-21 14:18 ` [PATCH 0/6] uprobes/x86: Cleanups and fixes Jiri Olsa
2025-08-21 18:27   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-08-21 19:52     ` Jiri Olsa
2025-08-21 19:57       ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-08-22  8:42   ` Jiri Olsa
2025-08-22 18:05     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-09 12:48       ` Jiri Olsa
2025-09-09 15:20         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-09 16:39           ` Jiri Olsa
2025-09-09 16:44             ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-08-22 15:51 ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250826065158.1b7ad5fc@pumpkin \
    --to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
    --cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
    --cc=alx@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=eyal.birger@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=thomas@t-8ch.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).