From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 245222264CB; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 23:32:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758151954; cv=none; b=iU61USWjEzKkv9/mDkj/F5xHgFX80knjOKyn1GaBUOUoLtbKzkEk8xfv4wwFugpKRsSi2WAtgoqmpObSNb0DFbfMP0cVq4214gUU8HBkMj3lS73IXATdGAaktWwE68WsAhYEjnf0/1A4HN8BeANtZ2PQxXqy+d29D91NPbDT4Hw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758151954; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Q1LlePHFW6OFmWWxXRZb1NAOVgqhCDoNI3SVEIRy3Zo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=EreQGKLcwfwBQb2vdlzfjspNMZBPTPKjvN9CWLl0CPATJBgE6SmpJ4c9BcdzErcKje6olgGzU2fs8hM+J400x7KcSqOeB60tzMpJooFBGGhe0fnfL/N0zSpuvoKkb8/DSPjpeerJJtrSeBkbiR8IaaaQwzHCKHbi+GLIYV7Q1Ks= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b=aJLsOO20; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b="aJLsOO20" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 29CD8C4CEE7; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 23:32:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1758151953; bh=Q1LlePHFW6OFmWWxXRZb1NAOVgqhCDoNI3SVEIRy3Zo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=aJLsOO20NeMd3MhLkP7ZWhd6G7WGkxoKAeAR9nQUOYFW2HD6DA8oxRfYjz1SPlkO3 hMrOaaIo+facT/wqvl8beH17JYZskJHqEMifp0FxNhHxzFUULQFiujGBFm+OU9WEm9 yhwfXEw95u6rhoXY+PCJJkHHQ/dlshEmTqngiFhM= Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 16:32:31 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Lorenzo Stoakes Cc: Kalesh Singh , minchan@kernel.org, david@redhat.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, rppt@kernel.org, pfalcato@suse.de, kernel-team@android.com, android-mm@google.com, Alexander Viro , Christian Brauner , Jan Kara , Kees Cook , Vlastimil Babka , Suren Baghdasaryan , Michal Hocko , Steven Rostedt , Masami Hiramatsu , Mathieu Desnoyers , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , Valentin Schneider , Jann Horn , Shuah Khan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] vma count: fixes, test and improvements Message-Id: <20250917163231.b5f7b8012367f033a91e6f9b@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20250915163838.631445-1-kaleshsingh@google.com> <20250915153401.61cbd5120871ee7a4e5b9cae@linux-foundation.org> <20250916191645.15aae276992acafe7f7e723e@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 17 Sep 2025 06:36:34 +0100 Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > > > > > Perhaps being less accepting of patches during merge window is one aspect, > > > as the merge window leading up to this cycle was almost the same review > > > load as when the cycle started. > > > > I'm having trouble understanding what you said here? > > Sorry, what I mean to say is that in mm we're pretty open to taking stuff in the > merge window, esp. now we have mm-new. > > And last merge window my review load felt similar to during a cycle, which > was kind of crazy. > > So I wonder if we should be less accommodating and simply say 'sorry it's > the merge window, no submissions accepted'? hm, I always have a lot of emails piled up by the time mm-stable gets merged upstream. That ~1 week between "we merged" and "-rc1" is a nice time to go through that material and add it to mm-new. I think it smooths things out. I mean, this is peak time for people to be considering the new material? (ot, that backlog is always >400 emails and a lot of that gets tossed out anyway - either it's just too old so I request a refresh or there was a new version, or review was unpromising, etc).