From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: "Oleg Nesterov" <oleg@redhat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
"Song Liu" <songliubraving@fb.com>, "Yonghong Song" <yhs@fb.com>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"Hao Luo" <haoluo@google.com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
"Alan Maguire" <alan.maguire@oracle.com>,
"David Laight" <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
"Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas@t-8ch.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>, "Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>,
"Alejandro Colomar" <alx@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uprobe: Move arch_uprobe_optimize right after handlers execution
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 08:20:45 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251002082045.f9059a70eebea517e7cb67b8@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251001132449.178759-1-jolsa@kernel.org>
On Wed, 1 Oct 2025 15:24:49 +0200
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote:
> It's less confusing to optimize uprobe right after handlers execution
> and before we do the check for changed ip register to avoid situations
> where changed ip register would skip uprobe optimization.
>
> Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Thanks,
> ---
> kernel/events/uprobes.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> index 5dcf927310fd..c14ec27b976d 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> @@ -2765,6 +2765,9 @@ static void handle_swbp(struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> handler_chain(uprobe, regs);
>
> + /* Try to optimize after first hit. */
> + arch_uprobe_optimize(&uprobe->arch, bp_vaddr);
> +
> /*
> * If user decided to take execution elsewhere, it makes little sense
> * to execute the original instruction, so let's skip it.
> @@ -2772,9 +2775,6 @@ static void handle_swbp(struct pt_regs *regs)
> if (instruction_pointer(regs) != bp_vaddr)
> goto out;
>
> - /* Try to optimize after first hit. */
> - arch_uprobe_optimize(&uprobe->arch, bp_vaddr);
> -
> if (arch_uprobe_skip_sstep(&uprobe->arch, regs))
> goto out;
>
> --
> 2.51.0
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-01 23:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-01 13:24 [PATCH] uprobe: Move arch_uprobe_optimize right after handlers execution Jiri Olsa
2025-10-01 16:39 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-10-01 23:20 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2025-10-03 11:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251002082045.f9059a70eebea517e7cb67b8@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
--cc=alx@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=thomas@t-8ch.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).