From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAFC9219A8E; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 13:31:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762954262; cv=none; b=e/jE43JHQJZeNde5UwJ3QhwNDoLjF5clEgic/6UNsipKB/jl0COZUkRVAS8U2jNoIYDQY6DcvH4xusVVHHUpxB+Ems2QF7N/lWKGfmoftqpzNCrYFq0nT7AlOXv3G1Jruv5ZnPudh6h/C1sWsoWTheyE8FQpgid+UhxRJk2gWRs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762954262; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2poLlO9B5CBMuS1HOT8AsTBXsJggdrQRNTQdmucUiaY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=I8V6w3P3v2q5D4Q2QFKkW3tD4anotFxwFsROno+tEvB2CG7d7QBtH188DP05VAWcDxpXoFYvLGQiNQaQNzosnAI3G8tji8IS02eneCaUUweM1kGS9OtPpUUX0N1x60RKy76jlAuSMo8PgtO/4g5dM3X+Pci6G8LJbtIC45ZuR3c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=maQSL4In; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="maQSL4In" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 288BBC2BC86; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 13:30:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1762954261; bh=2poLlO9B5CBMuS1HOT8AsTBXsJggdrQRNTQdmucUiaY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=maQSL4InaEIoWc7a6LxKSVC9E12GsXKu0YLReFJoP/Z9xYuRKa26yQ9AuXQwVgUBa depJlEKBsRznRaKvsg7BBMhUfrSkQcANG+eY7v6M1pG1X7O75wIQF2CWJcaN//Dz4d IjV8BqL/Zwf0Mlz3z+5768ooXXso+AOWFezZQqjvgSgU3Rh65rX0CjBK4WxyRNQQI4 d5C2+hEnPBM1Vyv9HRFbWQ8+kJwGTqnkAb7tZ80JiwtmO4pbf8RBb0Qnu3TboZUkLd VViUWKIKBreX3gztlXzP8qaQqV6QkwXHj611I6ETvBipFWIPLSCUPT2yrcPFGKJUdS LuW9dGN2at8VA== Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 22:30:54 +0900 From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) To: Mark Brown Cc: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Steven Rostedt , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , x86@kernel.org, Jinchao Wang , Mathieu Desnoyers , Thomas Gleixner , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , "H . Peter Anvin" , Alexander Shishkin , Ian Rogers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Aishwarya.TCV@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/8] selftests: tracing: Add a basic testcase for wprobe Message-Id: <20251112223054.6ae557a50f1d998c9b46861c@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <175859019940.374439.7398451124225791618.stgit@devnote2> <175859026716.374439.14852239332989324292.stgit@devnote2> <20251027224347.4c887cc956df63602f377550@kernel.org> <20251028084222.a3c1ae97d125d9bd88fc565b@kernel.org> <20251028105549.ae94e8eeb42f4efc183d2807@kernel.org> <20251029004219.dc9cda0eb56ae46c55855844@kernel.org> <20251029114317.167b7d908533385c1c9e6782@kernel.org> <20251029172004.a0aca144735f20a6a59d2aa6@kernel.org> <20251030090952.befea7f0cecd5518c7fda02c@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.8.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 12:15:03 +0000 Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 09:09:52AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote: > > > There is a single step execution code but only for default overflow_handlers. > > This is a bit strange becuase other users can not set it up outside of > > the arch dependent code. Even if it can, it is simply redundant. > > > So I made changes below which allow users to set its own custom handler is > > compatible with perf default overflow handlers. > > I confirmed this works on both arm and arm64. > > I think everyone who knows this code is really snowed under at the > minute - can I suggest posting this as a fix for now? This is still > broken on arm64, we'll need a fix (or to disable the feature on the > affected arches) one way or another for v6.19. Sorry, let me drop it from for-next soon. Thanks, -- Masami Hiramatsu (Google)