From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@kernel.org>,
Florent Revest <revest@google.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCHv2 bpf-next 0/9] ftrace,bpf: Use single direct ops for bpf trampolines
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 13:37:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251113123750.2507435-1-jolsa@kernel.org> (raw)
hi,
while poking the multi-tracing interface I ended up with just one ftrace_ops
object to attach all trampolines.
This change allows to use less direct API calls during the attachment changes
in the future code, so in effect speeding up the attachment.
In current code we get a speed up from using just a single ftrace_ops object.
- with current code:
Performance counter stats for 'bpftrace -e fentry:vmlinux:ksys_* {} -c true':
6,364,157,902 cycles:k
828,728,902 cycles:u
1,064,803,824 instructions:u # 1.28 insn per cycle
23,797,500,067 instructions:k # 3.74 insn per cycle
4.416004987 seconds time elapsed
0.164121000 seconds user
1.289550000 seconds sys
- with the fix:
Performance counter stats for 'bpftrace -e fentry:vmlinux:ksys_* {} -c true':
6,535,857,905 cycles:k
810,809,429 cycles:u
1,064,594,027 instructions:u # 1.31 insn per cycle
23,962,552,894 instructions:k # 3.67 insn per cycle
1.666961239 seconds time elapsed
0.157412000 seconds user
1.283396000 seconds sys
The speedup seems to be related to the fact that with single ftrace_ops object
we don't call ftrace_shutdown anymore (we use ftrace_update_ops instead) and
we skip the synchronize rcu calls (each ~100ms) at the end of that function.
rfc: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250729102813.1531457-1-jolsa@kernel.org/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250923215147.1571952-1-jolsa@kernel.org/
v2 changes:
- rebased on top fo bpf-next/master plus Song's livepatch fixes [1]
- renamed the API functions [2] [Steven]
- do not export the new api [Steven]
- kept the original direct interface:
I'm not sure if we want to melt both *_ftrace_direct and the new interface
into single one. It's bit different in semantic (hence the name change as
Steven suggested [2]) and I don't think the changes are not that big so
we could easily keep both APIs.
v1 changes:
- make the change x86 specific, after discussing with Mark options for
arm64 [Mark]
thanks,
jirka
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20251027175023.1521602-1-song@kernel.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250924050415.4aefcb91@batman.local.home/
---
Jiri Olsa (8):
ftrace: Make alloc_and_copy_ftrace_hash direct friendly
ftrace: Export some of hash related functions
ftrace: Add update_ftrace_direct_add function
ftrace: Add update_ftrace_direct_del function
ftrace: Add update_ftrace_direct_mod function
bpf: Add trampoline ip hash table
ftrace: Factor ftrace_ops ops_func interface
bpf, x86: Use single ftrace_ops for direct calls
arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
include/linux/bpf.h | 7 ++-
include/linux/ftrace.h | 37 ++++++++++++++-
kernel/bpf/trampoline.c | 199 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
kernel/trace/Kconfig | 3 ++
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
kernel/trace/trace.h | 8 ----
7 files changed, 532 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2025-11-13 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-13 12:37 Jiri Olsa [this message]
2025-11-13 12:37 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 1/8] ftrace: Make alloc_and_copy_ftrace_hash direct friendly Jiri Olsa
2025-11-13 12:37 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 2/8] ftrace: Export some of hash related functions Jiri Olsa
2025-11-13 12:37 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 3/8] ftrace: Add update_ftrace_direct_add function Jiri Olsa
2025-11-13 13:02 ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-11-13 15:59 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-11-13 12:37 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 4/8] ftrace: Add update_ftrace_direct_del function Jiri Olsa
2025-11-13 13:02 ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-11-13 16:00 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-11-13 12:37 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 5/8] ftrace: Add update_ftrace_direct_mod function Jiri Olsa
2025-11-13 13:02 ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-11-13 16:00 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-11-13 17:57 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-11-13 12:37 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 6/8] bpf: Add trampoline ip hash table Jiri Olsa
2025-11-13 12:37 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 7/8] ftrace: Factor ftrace_ops ops_func interface Jiri Olsa
2025-11-13 12:37 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 8/8] bpf, x86: Use single ftrace_ops for direct calls Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251113123750.2507435-1-jolsa@kernel.org \
--to=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
--cc=revest@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).