From: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat@oracle.com>,
"Jose E. Marchesi" <jemarch@gnu.org>,
Beau Belgrave <beaub@linux.microsoft.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
"Carlos O'Donell" <codonell@redhat.com>,
Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>, Dylan Hatch <dylanbhatch@google.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 12/15] s390/ptrace: Provide frame_pointer()
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 18:14:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251205171446.2814872-13-jremus@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251205171446.2814872-1-jremus@linux.ibm.com>
On s390 64-bit the s390x ELF ABI [1] designates register 11 as the
"preferred" frame pointer (FP) register in user space.
While at it convert instruction_pointer() and user_stack_pointer()
from macros to inline functions, to align their definition with
x86 and arm64.
Use const qualifier on struct pt_regs pointers to prevent compiler
warnings:
arch/s390/kernel/stacktrace.c: In function ‘arch_stack_walk_user_common’:
arch/s390/kernel/stacktrace.c:114:34: warning: passing argument 1 of
‘instruction_pointer’ discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target
type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
...
arch/s390/kernel/stacktrace.c:117:48: warning: passing argument 1 of
‘user_stack_pointer’ discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target
type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
...
[1]: s390x ELF ABI, https://github.com/IBM/s390x-abi/releases
Signed-off-by: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
---
Notes (jremus):
Changes in RFC v2:
- Separate provide frame_pointer() into this new commit.
arch/s390/include/asm/ptrace.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/ptrace.h
index dfa770b15fad..455c119167fc 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/ptrace.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/ptrace.h
@@ -212,8 +212,6 @@ void update_cr_regs(struct task_struct *task);
#define arch_has_block_step() (1)
#define user_mode(regs) (((regs)->psw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE) != 0)
-#define instruction_pointer(regs) ((regs)->psw.addr)
-#define user_stack_pointer(regs)((regs)->gprs[15])
#define profile_pc(regs) instruction_pointer(regs)
static inline long regs_return_value(struct pt_regs *regs)
@@ -235,6 +233,22 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long kernel_stack_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs)
return regs->gprs[15];
}
+static __always_inline unsigned long instruction_pointer(const struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ return regs->psw.addr;
+}
+
+static __always_inline unsigned long frame_pointer(const struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ /* Return ABI-designated "preferred" frame-pointer register value. */
+ return regs->gprs[11];
+}
+
+static __always_inline unsigned long user_stack_pointer(const struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ return regs->gprs[15];
+}
+
static __always_inline unsigned long regs_get_register(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int offset)
{
if (offset >= NUM_GPRS)
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-05 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-05 17:14 [RFC PATCH v2 00/15] s390: SFrame user space unwinding Jens Remus
2025-12-05 17:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/15] unwind_user: Enhance comments on get CFA, FP, and RA Jens Remus
2025-12-05 17:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/15] unwind_user/fp: Use dummies instead of ifdef Jens Remus
2025-12-05 17:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/15] x86/unwind_user: Guard unwind_user_word_size() by UNWIND_USER Jens Remus
2025-12-05 17:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-12-05 17:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/15] s390: asm/dwarf.h should only be included in assembly files Jens Remus
2025-12-05 17:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/15] s390/vdso: Avoid emitting DWARF CFI for non-vDSO Jens Remus
2025-12-05 17:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/15] s390/vdso: Keep function symbols in vDSO Jens Remus
2025-12-05 17:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/15] s390/vdso: Enable SFrame generation " Jens Remus
2025-12-05 17:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/15] unwind_user: Enable archs that define CFA = SP_callsite + offset Jens Remus
2025-12-05 17:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/15] unwind_user: Enable archs that pass RA in a register Jens Remus
2025-12-05 17:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/15] unwind_user: Enable archs that save RA/FP in other registers Jens Remus
2025-12-05 17:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/15] unwind_user/sframe: Enable archs with encoded SFrame CFA offsets Jens Remus
2025-12-05 17:14 ` Jens Remus [this message]
2025-12-05 17:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/15] s390/unwind_user/sframe: Enable HAVE_UNWIND_USER_SFRAME Jens Remus
2025-12-05 17:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/15] unwind_user/backchain: Introduce back chain user space unwinding Jens Remus
2025-12-07 15:10 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-12-08 15:38 ` Jens Remus
2025-12-05 17:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/15] s390/unwind_user/backchain: Enable HAVE_UNWIND_USER_BACKCHAIN Jens Remus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251205171446.2814872-13-jremus@linux.ibm.com \
--to=jremus@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=beaub@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=codonell@redhat.com \
--cc=dylanbhatch@google.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=indu.bhagat@oracle.com \
--cc=jemarch@gnu.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@kernel.org \
--cc=sam@gentoo.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).